23.09.2013 Views

Äktenskap för par med samma kön Vigselfrågor - Regeringen

Äktenskap för par med samma kön Vigselfrågor - Regeringen

Äktenskap för par med samma kön Vigselfrågor - Regeringen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SOU 2007:17 Summary<br />

around them. With these points of de<strong>par</strong>ture there is consequently<br />

no reason for making any distinction between homosexual and<br />

heterosexual persons as regards the opportunities to be able to enter<br />

into marriage.<br />

The meaning of marriage. Marriage has long been dee<strong>med</strong> to be a<br />

social institution for cohabitation between a man and a woman, and<br />

this definition of marriage is deeply rooted in society, both here in<br />

Sweden and abroad. It also corresponds with the fundamental view<br />

of marriage by religious communities as an institution although the<br />

perception of religious communities on the specific implications of<br />

marriage may differ here. However, a <strong>par</strong>ticular perception or<br />

definition of a social phenomenon cannot last forever even if it has<br />

very deep roots. Social progress advances and new values and<br />

opinions might also have to be given scope when it is a matter of<br />

fundamental opinions. The view of society on homosexuality is one<br />

example of such a shift in opinion and in various areas attempts<br />

have been made to eliminate former disfavourable treatment of<br />

homosexuals and to counteract discrimination. This has, among<br />

other things, been expressed in the basic principles laid down in<br />

Chapter 1, Section 2 of the Swedish Constitution, where it is stated<br />

that society should counteract discrimination on the basis of,<br />

among other things, sexual orientation. The fact that marriage is<br />

not open to couples of the same sex will not, either according to<br />

the Constitution or the European Convention, amount to discrimination<br />

as such on the basis of sexual orientation, but it nonetheless<br />

implies a kind of special disfavourable treatment.<br />

In my opinion, the traditional significance of marriage as a<br />

heterosexual relationship cannot determine whether marriage should<br />

also be opened up to couples of the same sex. The legislator must<br />

be at liberty to define marriage so that it corresponds to prevailing<br />

opinion. For the <strong>par</strong>ties themselves to be allowed to decide about<br />

whom they wish to marry, without some kinds of couple being<br />

excluded from marriage, may also be considered to fall more<br />

closely in line with the neutrality expressed by the Marriage Code<br />

(ÄktB) as regards the position spouses care to adopt in relation to<br />

each other.<br />

The term ‘marriage’. The reference group, with representatives<br />

from religious communities, has objected to the term ‘marriage’<br />

being used in legislation that applies both to couples of different<br />

sex and couples of the same sex. Another legal term should be used<br />

instead since for religious communities ‘marriage’ is an emotive term,<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!