Äktenskap för par med samma kön Vigselfrågor - Regeringen
Äktenskap för par med samma kön Vigselfrågor - Regeringen
Äktenskap för par med samma kön Vigselfrågor - Regeringen
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SOU 2007:17 Summary<br />
around them. With these points of de<strong>par</strong>ture there is consequently<br />
no reason for making any distinction between homosexual and<br />
heterosexual persons as regards the opportunities to be able to enter<br />
into marriage.<br />
The meaning of marriage. Marriage has long been dee<strong>med</strong> to be a<br />
social institution for cohabitation between a man and a woman, and<br />
this definition of marriage is deeply rooted in society, both here in<br />
Sweden and abroad. It also corresponds with the fundamental view<br />
of marriage by religious communities as an institution although the<br />
perception of religious communities on the specific implications of<br />
marriage may differ here. However, a <strong>par</strong>ticular perception or<br />
definition of a social phenomenon cannot last forever even if it has<br />
very deep roots. Social progress advances and new values and<br />
opinions might also have to be given scope when it is a matter of<br />
fundamental opinions. The view of society on homosexuality is one<br />
example of such a shift in opinion and in various areas attempts<br />
have been made to eliminate former disfavourable treatment of<br />
homosexuals and to counteract discrimination. This has, among<br />
other things, been expressed in the basic principles laid down in<br />
Chapter 1, Section 2 of the Swedish Constitution, where it is stated<br />
that society should counteract discrimination on the basis of,<br />
among other things, sexual orientation. The fact that marriage is<br />
not open to couples of the same sex will not, either according to<br />
the Constitution or the European Convention, amount to discrimination<br />
as such on the basis of sexual orientation, but it nonetheless<br />
implies a kind of special disfavourable treatment.<br />
In my opinion, the traditional significance of marriage as a<br />
heterosexual relationship cannot determine whether marriage should<br />
also be opened up to couples of the same sex. The legislator must<br />
be at liberty to define marriage so that it corresponds to prevailing<br />
opinion. For the <strong>par</strong>ties themselves to be allowed to decide about<br />
whom they wish to marry, without some kinds of couple being<br />
excluded from marriage, may also be considered to fall more<br />
closely in line with the neutrality expressed by the Marriage Code<br />
(ÄktB) as regards the position spouses care to adopt in relation to<br />
each other.<br />
The term ‘marriage’. The reference group, with representatives<br />
from religious communities, has objected to the term ‘marriage’<br />
being used in legislation that applies both to couples of different<br />
sex and couples of the same sex. Another legal term should be used<br />
instead since for religious communities ‘marriage’ is an emotive term,<br />
33