Äktenskap för par med samma kön Vigselfrågor - Regeringen
Äktenskap för par med samma kön Vigselfrågor - Regeringen
Äktenskap för par med samma kön Vigselfrågor - Regeringen
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Summary SOU 2007:17<br />
permit to conduct wedding ceremonies or would refrain from<br />
applying for such a permit. This would in reality mean a transition<br />
to mainly civil marriage ceremonies. As already mentioned, such a<br />
transition would in its turn lead to a number of practical difficulties.<br />
Nor should it, in my opinion, be a precondition for a religious<br />
community’s wedding permit that it allows weddings both for<br />
couples of different sexes and couples of the same sex. The reason<br />
stated regarding the obligation on religious communities’ officials<br />
to conduct wedding ceremonies is also relevant as regards an<br />
obligation on religious communities to offer wedding ceremonies.<br />
Consequently, no obligation to conduct wedding ceremonies should<br />
be imposed on either wedding ceremony officials within a religious<br />
denomination or on the communities.<br />
Since the task of conducting wedding ceremonies constitutes the<br />
exercise of official power, I propose that an express provision is included<br />
in ÄktB providing that the officials of a religious community<br />
are not liable to conduct wedding ceremonies.<br />
Civil wedding ceremonies<br />
The task of the courts to conduct wedding ceremonies. The assignment<br />
included adopting a position on who in the future should be<br />
entrusted with the task of conducting civil wedding ceremonies.<br />
The Government has, among other things, raised the issue of<br />
whether the power of legally qualified judges to conduct wedding<br />
ceremonies should be abolished. In the past few years extensive<br />
reform work has been underway to develop and modernise the<br />
judicial service. The judicial operation should as far as possible only<br />
be oriented towards the administration of justice. In my opinion,<br />
the conduct of wedding ceremonies is basically an administrative<br />
task without any adjudicative element, and is therefore generally<br />
viewed as being an anomalous operation for the courts. Nor does<br />
the task of a wedding ceremony official require the special competence<br />
that legally qualified judges have. It is thus in line with the<br />
general effort to streamline the courts and the business of the<br />
courts that wedding ceremony matters are no longer dealt with at<br />
court. The courts should consequently be released from the task of<br />
conducting wedding ceremonies.<br />
Who should conduct civil wedding ceremonies in the future? There<br />
are certain advantages of a system in which the Tax Agency becomes<br />
44