23.09.2013 Views

Äktenskap för par med samma kön Vigselfrågor - Regeringen

Äktenskap för par med samma kön Vigselfrågor - Regeringen

Äktenskap för par med samma kön Vigselfrågor - Regeringen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SOU 2007:17 Summary<br />

sitional purposes for a period of one year. Moreover, the provisions<br />

contained in ÄktB referring to the internal rules of the Church of<br />

Sweden should be reworded to more accurately express the<br />

position of the Church of Sweden as being on a <strong>par</strong> with other<br />

religious communities as regards wedding ceremonies.<br />

I also propose that a new provision be included in ÄktB by<br />

which it is indicated that religious communities are entitled to<br />

impose a charge for performing religious ceremonies and that the<br />

provision on appeals against decisions about performing wedding<br />

ceremonies made by a priest of the Church of Sweden be repealed.<br />

The obligation of religious communities’ wedding officials or<br />

the community to perform wedding ceremonies<br />

On the basis of a religious wedding ceremony being a religious<br />

service, there is reason to question whether an obligation to marry<br />

two women or two men would violate the freedom of religion in<br />

those cases where the religion prohibits marriage between two<br />

persons who are of the same sex. In any event, such an obligation<br />

crosscuts the area of freedom of religion. It is not reasonable to<br />

require that a religious community should conduct wedding<br />

services that are alien to its beliefs. Moreover, an obligation to<br />

conduct wedding ceremonies would in practice also provide anyone<br />

with an unconditional right to the religious ceremony, as the<br />

religious component cannot be se<strong>par</strong>ated from the legal component.<br />

Another factor is that it would not be reasonable to limit the<br />

obligation to conduct wedding ceremonies so that it generally<br />

relates to couples of the same sex. A general obligation to conduct<br />

wedding ceremonies would go too far even if it were limited to<br />

relate to the members of the respective religious communities. A<br />

wedding ceremony official can in fact also refuse to marry a couple<br />

for reasons other than they being of the same sex. The statutory<br />

text would therefore need to specify when the obligation to<br />

conduct a wedding ceremony does not apply. Such a regulation<br />

would probably result in a considerable number of exceptions. In<br />

practice it would also be difficult to determine what reasons<br />

underlie a refusal to perform a wedding ceremony. If requirements<br />

are imposed on religious communities’ wedding ceremony officials<br />

to marry couples of the same sex, there is also significant risk that<br />

most religious communities would no longer wish to retain their<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!