Äktenskap för par med samma kön Vigselfrågor - Regeringen
Äktenskap för par med samma kön Vigselfrågor - Regeringen
Äktenskap för par med samma kön Vigselfrågor - Regeringen
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SOU 2007:17 Summary<br />
sitional purposes for a period of one year. Moreover, the provisions<br />
contained in ÄktB referring to the internal rules of the Church of<br />
Sweden should be reworded to more accurately express the<br />
position of the Church of Sweden as being on a <strong>par</strong> with other<br />
religious communities as regards wedding ceremonies.<br />
I also propose that a new provision be included in ÄktB by<br />
which it is indicated that religious communities are entitled to<br />
impose a charge for performing religious ceremonies and that the<br />
provision on appeals against decisions about performing wedding<br />
ceremonies made by a priest of the Church of Sweden be repealed.<br />
The obligation of religious communities’ wedding officials or<br />
the community to perform wedding ceremonies<br />
On the basis of a religious wedding ceremony being a religious<br />
service, there is reason to question whether an obligation to marry<br />
two women or two men would violate the freedom of religion in<br />
those cases where the religion prohibits marriage between two<br />
persons who are of the same sex. In any event, such an obligation<br />
crosscuts the area of freedom of religion. It is not reasonable to<br />
require that a religious community should conduct wedding<br />
services that are alien to its beliefs. Moreover, an obligation to<br />
conduct wedding ceremonies would in practice also provide anyone<br />
with an unconditional right to the religious ceremony, as the<br />
religious component cannot be se<strong>par</strong>ated from the legal component.<br />
Another factor is that it would not be reasonable to limit the<br />
obligation to conduct wedding ceremonies so that it generally<br />
relates to couples of the same sex. A general obligation to conduct<br />
wedding ceremonies would go too far even if it were limited to<br />
relate to the members of the respective religious communities. A<br />
wedding ceremony official can in fact also refuse to marry a couple<br />
for reasons other than they being of the same sex. The statutory<br />
text would therefore need to specify when the obligation to<br />
conduct a wedding ceremony does not apply. Such a regulation<br />
would probably result in a considerable number of exceptions. In<br />
practice it would also be difficult to determine what reasons<br />
underlie a refusal to perform a wedding ceremony. If requirements<br />
are imposed on religious communities’ wedding ceremony officials<br />
to marry couples of the same sex, there is also significant risk that<br />
most religious communities would no longer wish to retain their<br />
43