Ikenberry, G. J., 2002. Democracy, Institutions, and American Restraint. I: G. J. Ikenberry,red. American Unrivalled: The Future of the Balance of Power. Ithaca: Cornell UniversityPress, pp. 213-238.Ikenberry, G. J., 2011. The Future of the Liberal World Order,. Foreign Affairs, May/Jun,pp. 56-68.Jackson & Sørensen, 2007. International Political Economy: Classical Theories. I: R. &. S.G. Jackson, red. Introduction to International Relations - Theories and Approaches. 3rdEdition red. Ox<strong>for</strong>d: Ox<strong>for</strong>d University Press, pp. 178-186.Jervis, R., 1999. Realism, Neoliberalism and Cooperation. I: T. Farrell, red. SecurityStudies, Volume 1 - Theoreticai Debates. London: Routledge, 2010, pp. 90-102.Kennedy, R., 1997. Current Security Arrangements and Models <strong>for</strong> the Future: AnAmerican View. I: R. NATO Defense College, red. Co-operative Security Arrangements inEurope. Frankfurt: Europäischer Verlag der Wissenschaften.Khong, Y. & Nesadurai, H., 2007. Hanging Together, institutional design and cooperationin Southeast Asia: AFTA and the ARF. I: A. J. A. Acharya, red. Crafting Cooperation,Regional International Institutions in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.Kille, K. J. & Hendrickson, R. C., 2011. NATO and the United Nations: Debates andTrends in Institutional Coordination. Journal of International Organizations Studies, 2(1),pp. 28-49.Krüger-Klausen, V. & Odgaard, L., 2011. Preparing <strong>for</strong> the Imperfect World: A proposal <strong>for</strong>How to Carry Out Strategic Planning. København: <strong>Forsvarsakademiet</strong>.Lachowski, Z., 2002. The Adapted CFE Treaty and the Admission of the Baltic States toNATO. Stockholm: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.Layne, C., 1997. From Preponderence to Offshore Balancing,. I: R. J. A. &. K. N. Waltz,red. The Use of Force: Military Power and International Politics. Lanham: Rowman &Littlefield Publishers (2009), pp. 311-326.Masala, C. & Saariluoma, K., 2006. Renewing <strong>NATO's</strong> Partnerships: Towards a Coherentand Efficient Framework, Rome: NDC.Møller, B., 2002. NATO’s fremtid efter Kosovo og WTC. I: T. Frøling, red. Sikkerhedensaktører. København: Atlantsammenslutningen.Møller, P. S., 2009. NATO ved 60: Fra <strong>for</strong>svarsalliance til sikkerhedsfællesskab. I: T.Frøling, red. Fra kold krig til krisestyring - historien om <strong>NATO's</strong> fremtid. København:Atlantsammenslutningen.Myrli, S., 2008. Contributions of Non-NATO Members to NATO Operations,http://www.nato-pa.int/default.asp?SHORTCUT=1475: NATO Parliamentary Assemply.58
NAC/NACC, 1994. NATO homepage. [Online]Available at: http://www.nato.int/docu/comm/49-95/c940110b.htm[Senest hentet eller vist den 19 March 2012].NATO, Bi-SC, 2008. Response to Further Guidance on Proposed Changes to StrategicCommand and Partnership Coordination Cell Support to Military Cooperation withPartners. Mons / Northfolk: s.n.NATO, C-M, 2008. Proposal on a Way Ahead on Comprehensive Approach. Brussels:NATO HQ.NATO, C-M, 2011. Political Guidance. Brussels: NATO HQ.NATO, DSG, 2008. UN-NATO Declaration. Brussels: NATO HQ.NATO, IMS, 2010a. Partnership Lexicon. Brussels: NATO HQ.NATO, IMS, 2010. NATO Committee Structure Review - MC Advice. Brussels: NATO HQ.NATO, IMS, 2011a. Military Post-Lisbon / Post-Berlin Partnership Action Plan. Brussels:NATO HQ.NATO, IMS, 2011b. Cooperative Security as NATO’s Core Task. [Online]Available at: http://www.nato.int/cps/en/SID-43FAF7D9-8A175666/natolive/topics_77718.htm[Senest hentet eller vist den 1 December 2011].NATO, IMS, 2011c. NRC-MR Framework <strong>for</strong> NATO-Russia Military-to-MilitaryCooperation. Brussels: NATO HQ.NATO, IMS, 2011d. Military Cooperation Contribution to the 2012 PCM. Brussels: NATOHQ.NATO, IMS, 2011. Implementation of a Knowledge Development Capability. Brussels:NATO HQ.NATO, JALLC, 2008. Managing Partnerships: The Euro-Atlantic Partnership Work Plan,Lisbon: JALLC.NATO, MC, 2007. MC 0554/1, The Development and the Implementation of the WholePotential of the Operational Capabilities Concept within a more Operational Partnership.s.l.:s.n.NATO, MC, 2008. Revised Strategic Commands' Arrangement <strong>for</strong> the support to MilitaryCooperation with Partners. Brussels: IMS.NATO, MC, 2010. MC 591, Military Committee Guidance on Implementation of <strong>NATO's</strong>Partnership Workplans and Programmes. NATO HQ, Brussels: IMS.NATO, NAC, 1991. NATO, The Alliance’s Strategic Concept. Brussels: NATO HQ.NATO, NACC, 1994. Partnership <strong>for</strong> Peace: Framework Document. Brussels: NATO HQ.NATO, NSA, 2010. Allied Joint Publication 01(D) (AJP-01(D)) dated December 2010.Brussels: NSA.59
- Page 2:
AbstractThis thesis scrutinizes the
- Page 5 and 6:
IndholdsfortegnelseForkortelseslist
- Page 7 and 8:
ForkortelseslisteACOACTASEANAUBi-SC
- Page 9 and 10:
primært ind under denne tredje hov
- Page 11 and 12:
Med henblik på undersøgelsen af,
- Page 13 and 14: operationer, forsvarsplanlægning,
- Page 15 and 16: NATO’s partnere kan således samm
- Page 17 and 18: hvilke strategier der er valgt. De
- Page 19 and 20: Kapitel 2: Teori og empiriI dette k
- Page 21 and 22: Af hensyn til at danne overblik i r
- Page 23 and 24: strategisk mådehold og liberale s
- Page 25 and 26: Ekspertgruppens rapport 18 (NATO, S
- Page 27 and 28: nuværende og mulig fremtidig rolle
- Page 29 and 30: forblive en tungtvejende internatio
- Page 31 and 32: træning; samt interoperabilitet (N
- Page 33 and 34: andre IO, NGO. Således understøtt
- Page 35 and 36: tilbageholdenhed, liberale særtræ
- Page 37 and 38: kunne bidrage til alle partnerrelat
- Page 39 and 40: Princippet om liberale særtræk: P
- Page 41 and 42: her i særlig grad tilgodeser relat
- Page 43 and 44: udvikle sine militære relationer m
- Page 45 and 46: forhold til relationer med andre IO
- Page 47 and 48: aggrund, at bidrage til begrænsnin
- Page 49 and 50: Overordnet set er PMF modtaget posi
- Page 51 and 52: hensyn til uden pause at kunne genn
- Page 53 and 54: Meget markant og i følelsesladede
- Page 55 and 56: Princippet om strategisk tilbagehol
- Page 57 and 58: essourcemæssigt tunge. Der bør i
- Page 59 and 60: Tese 2, liberale særtræk: Fleksib
- Page 61 and 62: forbindelsesvirksomhed i partnernat
- Page 63: BibliografiArntoft, R. e. a., 2007.
- Page 67: NRC, PREP, 2010. Report on the Stat