MARIO BORILLO/JEAN-PIERRE GOULETTE: COMPUTING ARCHITECTURAL COMPOSITION FROM THE SEMANTICS OF „VOCABULAIRE...1. From the language analysis to the mental universe of thedesignerUntil a recent date, the scientific research was reticent to face the problems posed by the de-sign(creation) of sensory forms (Borillo & Sauvageot 1996); and indeed, everything indicates that thedifficulties necessary to surmount in order to describe those processes are considera-ble as theywill probably request not only the whole of the experimental cognitive disciplines, from psychology(for the exploration of the mental sphere) to neurosciences (would this be only for the sensorimotorcomponents of the processes), but also their necessary formal, ma-thematical, logical andcomputational complements, without which there would be possible neither theorizations nor simulations.To tell the truth, the actual problems can only be posed after having operated a wholeof adequate restrictions on a universe of such a complexity. In this immense field of investigation,the thread that we propose to follow here in order to pene-trate into the mental universe of the designeris the one of language (Jackendoff 1992). Fur-thermore: since our objective in the long termis, more specifically, to comprehend the genesis of architectural forms, we are more particularlyinterested in the means that language offers to express the space concepts that are requestedfrom that point of view.To define a »strategy of access to the mental universe of the designer by the analysis of the language…« is to assign to the latter the two functions:----First, the analysis of language is conceived of as a medium giving access to certain characteristicmental processes involved in architectural design.In addition, insofar as the significance of the expressions in language can be representedformally, it could be possible to define and formalize in logico-mathematical terms thesemantics of expressions of the architect‘s language.Starting from these representations, it becomes possible to simulate, by ›qualitative spatial reasoning‹,some processes of design expressed in the architect’s language.Our linguistic source of knowledge associated to the architectural elements and their compositionis the classical Vocabulaire de l’architecture by Pérouse de Montclos (Pérouse de Montclos1972).2. A formal semantics of the vocabulary of architecture2.1. Some principles of architectural design and compositionThe principles of architectural composition are based on a set of very particular concepts that arerevealed by the analysis of the terminological vocabulary of the elements of architecture (Goulette1997). Among these concepts, one finds mainly:IMAGE I Ausgabe 4 I 7/2006 48
MARIO BORILLO/JEAN-PIERRE GOULETTE: COMPUTING ARCHITECTURAL COMPOSITION FROM THE SEMANTICS OF „VOCABULAIRE...--whole/part relations (known as meronomic relations): the purpose of the compositionprocess is to gather in a unit a set of distinct components. The components are ›parts‹of a ›homogeneous‹ whole.--cognitive spatial relations: the spatial relations between objects, such as they arise fromthe interpretation of the language, exceed the framework of the traditional geometry. Asa matter of fact, these relations have to express topological and qualitative informationable to make exactly those distinctions necessary for expressing a relative arrangement ofthe values. Examples in ordinary language are given by the analysis of spatial prepositionlike on (the glass in on the table), at (the box is at the bottom of the wall), (Aurnague,Borillo et al. 1991). These relations do not exactly determine the complete geometry ofthe ob-jects. Only the relevant characteristics of the objects and the relations betweenthem are involved. Their essential function is to induce a structural similarity betweenthe represen-tations and the world represented.--models of composition: they are regular descriptions of architectural compositions (i. e.spatial configurations of architectural elements). These regular descriptions implementrules controlling the relative positions and dimensions of a set of elements that makeup an architectural entity such as defined in the vocabulary of architecture: from theelements to their composition.Starting from the definition of a formal semantics of the elements of the vocabulary, we representthe spatial relations and the principles of composition that arise from the analysis of this specificvocabulary. This first step allows us to compute a process of composition.We will try to test our basic assumption by the analysis of an architectural entity: la baie – the bay. 1In the vocabulary, the bay is a generic term, which indicates the various types of open-ings, withvarious functions, that bear into the walls of our buildings. To study this architec-tural element, werefer to the Vocabulaire de l‘architecture by analyzing the terminological descriptions it gives ofthis architectural object.A conceptual analysis leads us to consider each architectural ›object‹, indicated by a term of thevocabulary, as the association of three meanings, distinct but interdependent: we name them thearchitectural element, its spatial referent, and its geometrical representation. The meanings ofeach component must be considered in the context of the role played by those elements in thecomposition process.--The architectural element belongs above all to the field of the mental representation:it is a cognitive object, an object to think and conceive of a project of architecture,or to describe a building. Its essential characteristic is to be able to be named, to beindicated by a term that is associated to functional and geometrical characteristics (role,arrangement, proportion, morphology …) as we shall see later.--The spatial referent of an architectural element is a ›qualitative‹ object. It results fromthe proper spatial characteristics (topological and geometrical) of the architectural1 Thus, we actually relate in the following on the concept expressed by the French architectural term »la baie« as explained inthe »Vocabulaire de l’architecture«, and use English expressions merely to simplify reading this text.IMAGE I Ausgabe 4 I 7/2006 49
- Seite 1 und 2: IMAGE - Zeitschrift für interdiszi
- Seite 3 und 4: [Inhaltsverzeichnis]Beatrice Nunold
- Seite 5: BEATRICE NUNOLD: LANDSCHAFT ALS TOP
- Seite 9 und 10: BEATRICE NUNOLD: LANDSCHAFT ALS TOP
- Seite 11 und 12: BEATRICE NUNOLD: LANDSCHAFT ALS TOP
- Seite 13 und 14: BEATRICE NUNOLD: LANDSCHAFT ALS TOP
- Seite 15: BEATRICE NUNOLD: LANDSCHAFT ALS TOP
- Seite 21 und 22: BEATRICE NUNOLD: LANDSCHAFT ALS TOP
- Seite 23 und 24: BEATRICE NUNOLD: LANDSCHAFT ALS TOP
- Seite 25 und 26: BEATRICE NUNOLD: LANDSCHAFT ALS TOP
- Seite 27 und 28: BEATRICE NUNOLD: LANDSCHAFT ALS TOP
- Seite 29 und 30: BEATRICE NUNOLD: LANDSCHAFT ALS TOP
- Seite 31 und 32: BEATRICE NUNOLD: LANDSCHAFT ALS TOP
- Seite 33 und 34: [Inhaltsverzeichnis]Stephan Günzel
- Seite 35 und 36: STEPHAN GÜNZEL: BILDTHEORETISCHE A
- Seite 37 und 38: STEPHAN GÜNZEL: BILDTHEORETISCHE A
- Seite 39 und 40: STEPHAN GÜNZEL: BILDTHEORETISCHE A
- Seite 41 und 42: STEPHAN GÜNZEL: BILDTHEORETISCHE A
- Seite 43 und 44: STEPHAN GÜNZEL: BILDTHEORETISCHE A
- Seite 45 und 46: STEPHAN GÜNZEL: BILDTHEORETISCHE A
- Seite 47: [Inhaltsverzeichnis]Mario Borillo/J
- Seite 51 und 52: MARIO BORILLO/JEAN-PIERRE GOULETTE:
- Seite 53 und 54: MARIO BORILLO/JEAN-PIERRE GOULETTE:
- Seite 55 und 56: MARIO BORILLO/JEAN-PIERRE GOULETTE:
- Seite 57 und 58: MARIO BORILLO/JEAN-PIERRE GOULETTE:
- Seite 59 und 60: ALEXANDER GRAU: DATEN, BILDER: WELT
- Seite 61 und 62: ALEXANDER GRAU: DATEN, BILDER: WELT
- Seite 63 und 64: ALEXANDER GRAU: DATEN, BILDER: WELT
- Seite 65 und 66: ALEXANDER GRAU: DATEN, BILDER: WELT
- Seite 67 und 68: ALEXANDER GRAU: DATEN, BILDER: WELT
- Seite 69 und 70: ALEXANDER GRAU: DATEN, BILDER: WELT
- Seite 71 und 72: [Inhaltsverzeichnis]Elize BisanzZum
- Seite 73 und 74: ELIZE BISANZ: ZUM ERKENNTNISPOTENZI
- Seite 75 und 76: ELIZE BISANZ: ZUM ERKENNTNISPOTENZI
- Seite 77 und 78: ELIZE BISANZ: ZUM ERKENNTNISPOTENZI
- Seite 79 und 80: IMAGE - Zeitschrift für interdiszi
- Seite 81 und 82: FRANZ REITINGER: KARIKATURENSTREITm
- Seite 83 und 84: FRANZ REITINGER: KARIKATURENSTREITv
- Seite 85 und 86: FRANZ REITINGER: KARIKATURENSTREITM
- Seite 87 und 88: FRANZ REITINGER, REZENSION: GESCHIC
- Seite 89 und 90: [Inhaltsverzeichnis]Franz Reitinger
- Seite 91 und 92: FRANZ REITINGER, REZENSION: SUSANNE
- Seite 93 und 94: FRANZ REITINGER, REZENSION: SUSANNE
- Seite 95 und 96: [Inhaltsverzeichnis]Franz Reitinger
- Seite 97 und 98: FRANZ REITINGER, REZENSION: SIGRUN
- Seite 99 und 100:
[Inhaltsverzeichnis]Klaus Sachs-Hom
- Seite 101 und 102:
KLAUS SACHS-HOMBACH, REZENSION: BEN
- Seite 103 und 104:
SASCHA DEMARMELS, REZENSION: WOLFGA
- Seite 105 und 106:
[Inhaltsverzeichnis]Sascha Demarmel
- Seite 107 und 108:
SASCHA DEMARMELS, REZENSION: KLAUS
- Seite 109 und 110:
THOMAS MEDER, REZENSION: UWE STOKLO
- Seite 111 und 112:
THOMAS MEDER, REZENSION: KLAUS SACH
- Seite 113 und 114:
[Inhaltsverzeichnis]Eva Schürmann
- Seite 115 und 116:
EVA SCHÜRMANN, REZENSION: STEFAN M
- Seite 117 und 118:
EVA SCHÜRMANN, REZENSION: STEFAN M
- Seite 119 und 120:
EVA SCHÜRMANN, REZENSION: STEFAN M
- Seite 121 und 122:
EVA SCHÜRMANN, REZENSION: STEFAN M
- Seite 123 und 124:
EVA SCHÜRMANN, REZENSION: STEFAN M
- Seite 125 und 126:
EVA SCHÜRMANN, REZENSION: STEFAN M
- Seite 127 und 128:
[Inhaltsverzeichnis]ImpressumIMAGE