26.02.2013 Views

Program - Brookhaven National Laboratory

Program - Brookhaven National Laboratory

Program - Brookhaven National Laboratory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

many of the observed levels of 30 P. This contribution presents results of γ-ray study of the 28 Si( 3 He,pγ) 30 P<br />

reaction using high-resolution HPGe detectors for this reaction for the first time.<br />

Corresponding author: Balraj Singh<br />

[1] E. Bravo and G. Martinez-Pinedo, Phys. Rev. C 85,055805(2012)<br />

HD 8 5:45 PM<br />

Experimental Measurement of Absolute Gamma-ray Emission Probabilities for 138 Xe<br />

Xie Feng, Jiang Wen-gang, Li Xue-song, He Xiao-bing,<br />

Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology<br />

The gamma-ray emission probability is an important factor in the research field of nuclear-reaction products<br />

or radioisotope application. 138 Xe decays by beta-particle emission with a half-life of 14.08 min[1]. 138 Cs is<br />

daughter of 138 Xe, and decays by beta-particle emission with a half-life of 33.41 min[1] . The 138 Xe, with<br />

a short half-life, is radioactive gas nuclide. It was therefore difficult to determine the precise gamma-ray<br />

emission probability by using the routine method. Reference [1] an [2] gave the results of gamma-ray<br />

emission probabilities for 138 Xe, but the uncertainties is relatively large. Recently through preparation<br />

of the homogeneous sources for 138 Xe- 138 Cs [3], we obtained the activity of 138 Xe by using the decay<br />

relationship between 138 Xe and 138 Cs. After the gamma-ray efficiency curve of the HPGe detector was<br />

calibrated using many standard sources and self-absorbed effect was corrected [4], the absolute gamma-ray<br />

full-energy peak efficiency of 138 Xe were determined. Thus, the absolute emission probabilities of three<br />

main gamma-ray for 138 Xe were determined , and the results of 258 ,434keV and 1768keV were 34.91(62)%,<br />

22.18(35)% and 18.79(30)%, respectively. The results of the present work were in poor agreement with<br />

Ref.[1]. Because the data adopted in the evaluation of Ref[1] were almost determined in the 1970’s when<br />

the experiment equipment and measuring technology were behind today, we believe that the results gave<br />

in the present work are more reliable.<br />

[1] FIRESTONE R B., Table of isotopes, 8th Edition, 1998. [2] J.K.Tuli, Selected Update for A=138*,<br />

Nuclear Data Sheets, 74,349, 1995. [3] Z.Y.Chen, F.Xie, Preparation of calibration sources of 88 Kr and<br />

138 Xe for HPGe detector, Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 273: 257-261, 2007. [4] XIE<br />

Feng, The study of self-absorption correction in γ-ray efficiency calibration of fission gas nuclide, Atom<br />

Energy Science and Technology, Vol.44, No.10, 2010.<br />

Session HE Nuclear Power Applications<br />

Tuesday March 5, 2013<br />

Room: Central Park West at 3:30 PM<br />

HE 1 3:30 PM<br />

Improvement of 238 U Inelastic Scattering Cross-Section for an Accurate Calculation of<br />

Large Commercial Reactors<br />

Alain Santamarina, D. Bernard, P. Leconte, J-F. Vidal<br />

CEA<br />

Sensitivity/Uncertainty studies are more and more used in Reactor Physics [1] and Safety-Criticality [2]<br />

[3]. There are currently utilized to assess the calculation uncertainty of design parameters for GEN-3<br />

and GEN-4. However, these S/U studies require realistic variance/covariance matrices associated with<br />

the Nuclear Data evaluation implemented in the ND working library. Therefore, it is recommended to<br />

125

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!