26.02.2013 Views

Program - Brookhaven National Laboratory

Program - Brookhaven National Laboratory

Program - Brookhaven National Laboratory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PR 40<br />

Sensitivity and System Response of Pin Power Peaking in VVER-1000 Fuel Assembly<br />

Using TSUNAMI-2D<br />

Jan Frybort, Department of Nuclear Reactors, Czech Technical University in Prague, V Holesovickach 2,<br />

18000, Prague, Czech Republic.<br />

Computational determination of pin power peaking must be done during designing of fuel assemblies and<br />

preparation of fuel batches. Large expertise was accumulated in this field, but modern calculational tools<br />

offer more sophisticated approach. For safety reasons the fuel in nuclear reactors must be prepared in<br />

such a away that fission power distribution must be flat among the assemblies in the reactor core and fuel<br />

pins in all assemblies. System TSUNAMI [1] developed in Oak Ridge <strong>National</strong> <strong>Laboratory</strong> can be used for<br />

sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of various systems and their responses. In this case, TSUNAMI-2D<br />

was applied to calculation of fission power distribution in a fuel assembly of VVER-1000 reactor. Results<br />

from these calculations can be used to determination of sensitivity of fission power in selected pins to<br />

fissile material concentration in other fuel pins. Alternatively, it can help to determine the best position<br />

of a burnable absorber (Gd203) containing fuel pins for suppression of excessive fission power in some fuel<br />

pins (close to the assembly periphery). Several cases were analysed. They differ in number and position<br />

of gadolinium fuel pins. The sensitivity of pin power peaking is important also during reactor operation,<br />

therefore the calculations were repeated for several fuel compositions obtained by fuel burnup calculation.<br />

This work was supported by Technology Agency of the Czech Republic (project TA02020840).<br />

[1] Rearden, B. T. and Mueller, D. E. and Bowman, S. M. and Busch, R. D. and Emerson, S. J. ”TSUNAMI<br />

Primer: A Primer for Sensitivity/Uncertainty Calculations with SCALE”, Oak Ridge <strong>National</strong> <strong>Laboratory</strong>,<br />

Oak Ridge, Tenn., 2009.<br />

PR 41<br />

Reactor g-ray Heating Studies at EXOGAM@ILL: Prompt g-ray Emission in U and Pu<br />

C. Guerrero, E. Berthoumieux, CERN, Geneva (Switzerland). D. Cano-Ott, T. Martinez, E. Mendoza,<br />

CIEMAT, Madrid (Spain). A. Algora, C. Domingo-Pardo, J. L. Tain, CSIC-IFIC, Valencia (Spain). M.<br />

Cortes-Giraldo, J. Praena, J. M. Quesada, Universidad de Sevilla (Spain). O. Litaize, D. Regnier, O.<br />

Serot, CEA, Cadarache (France).<br />

Nuclear energy plays a key role in the production of energy in the world, contributing nowadays to one third<br />

to the electricity consumption in the European Union. Although the present technology is well established,<br />

there is still an interest for improving the knowledge in some areas that would allow a safer and more efficient<br />

use of the existing reactors. In particular, the g-ray heating in the core of nuclear reactors is one of the<br />

main concerns for the safety during operation and also the decommissioning of nuclear reactors. Since the<br />

characteristics of g-ray emission (multiplicity, total energy and spectrum shape) [1] produced by capture<br />

(20% of prompt heat) and inelastic scattering (10% of prompt heat) is considered to be fairly known, the<br />

g-rays from the fission process become the major source of uncertainty in the prediction of prompt g-ray<br />

heating. It is estimated that the maximum uncertainty acceptable in the estimates for heat in innovative<br />

fast nuclear reactors is 7.5% [2], and a similar requirement is considered for the Jules Horowitz Reactor at<br />

Cadarache [3]. However, when the state-of-the-art calculations, based in experimental data from 70s, are<br />

compared to integral measurements in MINERVE the difference found in the C/E values amounts to 30%,<br />

a large discrepancy which arises from the lack of knowledge on g-ray emission [3]. For this reason, the<br />

283

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!