26.02.2013 Views

Program - Brookhaven National Laboratory

Program - Brookhaven National Laboratory

Program - Brookhaven National Laboratory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A large part of Brazil and thus of South America is subject to the South Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly<br />

(SAMA), which may modify the behavior of cosmic radiation showers as a function of altitude. Highenergy<br />

neutrons are produced by primary cosmic ray interactions with atoms in the atmosphere through<br />

spallation reactions and intranuclear cascade processes. These neutrons can produce secondary neutrons<br />

and also undergo moderation due to atmospheric interactions, resulting in a wide energy spectrum, which<br />

ranges from thermal energies (0.025 eV) to energies of several hundreds of MeV. The resulting cosmicray<br />

induced neutron spectrum (CRINS) is essential for evaluating the dose accumulated in aircraft crew<br />

members at flight altitude and the soft-error rates of semiconductor devices. It is thus very important<br />

to understand the cosmic-ray induced neutron spectrum in the atmosphere. The goal of this study is to<br />

assess the CRINS using the Monte Carlo computational codes MCNPX [1] and GEANT4 [2,3]. To do so,<br />

it is necessary to reproduce the physical situation of a wide energy spectrum of protons incident from all<br />

angles at the top of the atmosphere and propagating into it. The simulations were performed using physics<br />

models at energies above those available in nuclear data libraries and tabulated evaluations of nuclear data<br />

at lower energies.<br />

Corresponding author: B. V. Carlson<br />

[1] D. Pelowitz (Ed.), MCNPX User’s Manual Version 2.5.0, Los Alamos <strong>National</strong> <strong>Laboratory</strong> report LA-<br />

CP-05-0369 (2005). [2] S. Agostinelli et al., Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 506<br />

(2003) 250. [3] K. Amato et al., IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 53 (2006) 270.<br />

PR 127<br />

Statistical Building of a Hierarchy of Numerical Models with Deterministic Parameters for<br />

Cross Section Uncertainty Evaluations<br />

P. Dossantos-Uzarralde, S. Varet, S. Hilaire, CEA, DAM, DIF, F-91297 Arpajon, France. N. Vayatis,<br />

ENS Cachan, France. F. Prido, Phelma-Grenoble, France.<br />

Nuclear reaction models play a crucial role in today’s nuclear data evaluations. However, there are difficulties<br />

associated with evaluating data uncertainties, both in performing the experimental measurements<br />

as well as in building them from nuclear models. In this general context, our interest is targeted towards<br />

the study of the propagation of uncertainties within nuclear models, and in particular the evaluation of nuclear<br />

cross sections. Current approaches (Sensitivity propagation, Inverse Approach, Mean Squared Error,<br />

Bayesian Estimation, ...) envisaged for the study of cross sections uncertainties introduce numerous modelization<br />

biases whose impact on the announced uncertainty is unknown (parametric approaches, bayesian<br />

presuppositions, artificial alea). Keeping the cross section uncertainties under control requires to take into<br />

account two types of knowledge: a) the physical theory (and its implementation through the numerical<br />

codes) and b) the experiment. In front of the variability observed in the experimental measures and the<br />

sensibility of the numerical models with regards to their parameters, the statistical methods can supply<br />

a support for the quantification of the uncertainties. In this paper, we propose a new global approach<br />

intended to supply instruments for the comparison of the candidate cross sections. The basic hypothesis<br />

consists in not modelling the physical and numerical code parameters as random quantities. The idea is to<br />

sort the choices of modelling in a numerical code by level of adequacy (named score) with a set of preset<br />

measures. We can also see this approach as an attempt to produce a score associated with every theoretical<br />

model of cross section. We can also see our approach as a protocol to refute cross section evaluation or<br />

experimental measure. Regression models used for a statistical approximation of the cross sections allow<br />

in particular to take into account the constraint of regularity of the corresponding curves. Our approach<br />

bases itself on the following presuppositions: - The selection of ”relevant” points of measures (in other<br />

words, compatible with a theoretical model) can be automated while conforming to the criteria of the<br />

327

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!