Program - Brookhaven National Laboratory
Program - Brookhaven National Laboratory
Program - Brookhaven National Laboratory
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Alamos <strong>National</strong> <strong>Laboratory</strong>, Los Alamos, NM USA. W. A. Peters, Oak Ridge Associated Universities,<br />
Oak Ridge, TN US. J.T. Burke, R.J. Casperson, J.E. Escher, R. Hatarik, N.D. Scielzo, Lawrence<br />
Livermore <strong>National</strong> <strong>Laboratory</strong>, Livermore, CA US. M. McClesky, Texas A & M University, College<br />
Station, TX USA. R.A.E. Austin, St. Mary’s University, Halifax, NS Canada. R.O. Hughes, T.J. Ross,<br />
Richmond University, Richmond, VA USA.<br />
Neutron capture reactions are important for fundamental physics, such as understanding s- and r-process<br />
nucleosynthesis of heavy elements, as well as applications in nuclear energy, nuclear forensics and stockpile<br />
stewardship. There has been a long tradition of measuring these reactions directly and the U.S. <strong>National</strong><br />
Nuclear Data Center maintains an evaluation of existing data. In addition, the ENDF/B file includes<br />
neutron capture cross section values for all nuclei and over a wide range of energies, including many<br />
unstable species for which no measurements have been made. Given the importance of neutron capture<br />
cross sections it is important to validate a surrogate [2] for (n,γ) that can provide insight into these<br />
values, even with large effective neutron-energy bins. We have recently measured the 95 Mo(n,γ) reaction<br />
at LANSCE and the 95 Mo(d,pγ) reaction at Texas A & M as part of a focused effort to validate (d,pγ) as<br />
a surrogate for neutron capture. The 95 Mo(n,γ) cross section is known [3]. The (d,pγ) reaction is a good<br />
candidate for a surrogate reaction that would use radioactive beams in inverse kinematics on deuterium<br />
targets. Exploiting radioactive ion beams enables measurements of nuclear reactions on very short-lived<br />
nuclei (e.g., t 1/2 ≈1 s). The challenges in validating a surrogate for neutron capture will be discussed, as<br />
well as a presentation of the current status of the experimental analysis and interpretation. This work<br />
supported in part by the U.S. Department of Energy NNSA and Office of Nuclear Physics.<br />
[1] http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/capgam/ [2] Jutta E. Escher, Jason T. Burke, Frank S. Dietrich, Nicholas D.<br />
Scielzo, Ian J. Thompson, and Walid Younes, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 353 (2012) and references therein. [3]<br />
A.R. de L.Musgrove, B. J. Allen, J. W. Boldeman, R. L. Macklin, Nucl. Phys. A270, 108 (1976)<br />
Session KA Dissemination and International Colaboration<br />
Wednesday March 6, 2013<br />
Room: Met East at 1:30 PM<br />
KA 1 1:30 PM<br />
Working Party on International Nuclear Data Evaluation Co-operation (WPEC)<br />
E. Dupont, Nuclear Energy Agency, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. R.<br />
Forrest, Nuclear Data Section, International Atomic Energy Agency. T. Fukahori, Nuclear Data Center,<br />
Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Japan. Z. Ge, China Nuclear Data Center, China Institute of Atomic<br />
Energy, China. M. Herman, <strong>National</strong> Nuclear Data Center, <strong>Brookhaven</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Laboratory</strong>, USA. A.<br />
Ignatyuk, Russian Nuclear Data Center, Institute of Physics and Power Engineering, Russia. R.<br />
Jacqmin, Nuclear Energy Division, CEA Cadarache, France.<br />
The OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) is organizing a co-operation between the major nuclear data<br />
evaluation projects in the world. The co-operation involves the US ENDF project, the NEA Data Bank<br />
JEFF project, the Japanese JENDL project, and through collaboration with the International Atomic<br />
Energy Agency (IAEA) also non-OECD projects such as the Russian BROND and the Chinese CENDL<br />
projects. The NEA Working Party on International Nuclear Data Evaluation Co-operation (WPEC) is<br />
composed of about 20 core members representing worldwide evaluation projects. The WPEC meets annually<br />
to discuss progress within each evaluation project and to review nuclear data challenges and problems<br />
common to all projects. Needs for improvement of nuclear data are addressed by collaborative efforts in<br />
the framework of dedicated WPEC subgroups, consisting of experts from the different evaluation projects.<br />
150