26.02.2013 Views

Program - Brookhaven National Laboratory

Program - Brookhaven National Laboratory

Program - Brookhaven National Laboratory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Benchmarking of ENDF/B-VII and JENDL-4.0 in the Fast Neutron Range<br />

Mark Cornock<br />

AWE.Plc<br />

The recent releases of the ENDF/B-VII.1 [1] and JENDL-4 [2] libraries represent a significant upgrade in<br />

data for a number of nuclides. As part of its data release process the AWE Nuclear Data team assesses<br />

the internationally available data, through rigorous validation and verification. A part of this validation<br />

process involves Benchmarking of new data using a suite of ICSBEP [3] Benchmarks. K-effectives are<br />

calculated and compared to the published benchmark values. A number of other metrics are compared<br />

to determine which data shows the ”best fit” to the benchmark results. These metrics include a χ2 like<br />

measure, χ2 (kcalc−kexp)/(δkexp) 2<br />

sys = Σ n and a measure of the average difference between calculated and benchmark<br />

k- effectives 〈|∆|〉 = Σ |kcalc−kexp|<br />

n This benchmarking is then used to help make an informed decision<br />

as to which data is recommended for use by AWE’s user base. This initial work focuses on fast benchmark<br />

systems as defined in the ICSBEP Handbook. K-effectives are calculated for a number of fast systems with<br />

a wide range of materials. Validation metrics are calculated and compared for both libraries and compared<br />

to their predecessors. Calculations are in the main performed using a proprietary 1D Sn neutron transport<br />

code and comparisons are made with MCNP [4] calculations. Benchmark calculations will be shown and<br />

discussed; discussion will focus on the general fit of each of the calculations to the benchmark results with<br />

particluar emphasis placed on bare spheres such as JEZEBEL and GODIVA.<br />

British Crown Owned Copyright 2012/AWE Published with the permission of the Controller of Her<br />

Britannic Majesty’s Stationary Office. [1] “ENDF/B-VII.1 Nuclear Data for Science and Technology:<br />

Cross Sections, Covariances, Fission Product Yields and Decay Data”, M.B. Chadwick, M.W. Herman,<br />

P. Oblozinsky et al., NDS112, 2887 (2011). [2] “JENDL-4.0: A New Library for Nuclear Science and<br />

Engineering”, K Shibata, O Iwamoto, T Nagakawa et al., J Nucl Sci Technol, 48(1), 1-30, (2011). [3]<br />

“International handbook of evaluated criticality saftey benchmark experiments”, J.B Briggs et al., Tech<br />

Report NEA/NSC/DOC(95)04/I, (2004). [4] “MCNP- A General Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code,<br />

Version 5”, X-5 Monte Carlo Team, LANL Tech Report LA-UR-03-1987, (2003).<br />

NE 4 11:40 AM<br />

239 Pu Prompt Fission Neutron Spectra Impact on a Set of Criticality and Experimental<br />

Reactors Benchmarks<br />

Yannick Peneliau, Julien Henaff<br />

Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives - French Atomic Energy Commission -<br />

FRANCE<br />

Many nuclear data are investigated today to improve the calculation predictions of the new neutron transport<br />

simulation codes. With the new generation of nuclear power plants (GEN IV project), one expects<br />

to reduce the calculation uncertainties, mainly the uncertainties coming from nuclear data which are still<br />

very important before adjustment. In France, some future nuclear power plants will use MOX fuel, either<br />

in Sodium Fast Reactors or in Gas Cooled Fast Reactors. The knowledge of 239 Pu cross sections and other<br />

nuclear data is crucial issue to reach this in order to decrease these uncertainties. The Prompt Fission<br />

Neutron Spectra (PFNS) for this isotope are part of this challenge (an IAEA working group is dedicated<br />

to PFNS) and the work presented here deals with this particular topic. The main international data (i.e.<br />

JEFF-3.1.1, ENDFB-7.0, JENDL-4.0, BRC-2009) have been considered and compared with two different<br />

spectra, the ones coming from the works of Maslov and Kornilov. Other spectra are also examined, coming<br />

from the fission process Monte Carlo simulation code, FIFRELIN. The spectra are first compared by<br />

199

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!