26.02.2013 Views

Program - Brookhaven National Laboratory

Program - Brookhaven National Laboratory

Program - Brookhaven National Laboratory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DF 2 4:00 PM<br />

Determination of (n,γ) Cross Sections of 241 Am by PGAA<br />

M. Rossbach, C. Genreith<br />

Institute for Energy and Climate Research, IEK-6, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425 Jülich,<br />

Germany<br />

T. Belgya<br />

Nuclear Analysis and Radiography Department, Centre for Energy Research, Hungarian Academy of<br />

Sciences, H-1525 Budapest 114, P.O. Box 49, Hungary<br />

Z. Revay<br />

FRM II, Technische Universität München, Lichtenbergstr. 1, 85747 Garching, Germany<br />

B. W. Sleaford, J.E. Escher<br />

Lawrence Livermore <strong>National</strong> <strong>Laboratory</strong>, Livermore, CA 94551<br />

Accurate cross section data of actinides are crucial for criticality calculations of GEN IV reactors and<br />

transmutation but also for analytical purposes such as nuclear waste characterization, decommissioning of<br />

nuclear installations and safeguard applications. Tabulated data are inconsistent and sometimes associated<br />

with large uncertainties. In beam techniques, like prompt gamma activation analysis (PGAA) using<br />

external neutron beams from high flux reactors offer a chance for determination of absolute partial gamma<br />

ray production cross sections with a minimum of uncertainty to around 2 to 3%. Comparative experiments<br />

have been conducted at two independent research reactors to investigate the potential of PGAA for accurate<br />

cross section determination of actinides using well prepared 241 Am sources. Preparation of samples<br />

for irradiation at the Budapest Reactor and FRM II in Garching of the Am sources has been optimized together<br />

with PTB in Braunschweig. Samples were irradiated together and without flux monitors to extract<br />

the relevant nuclear data after appropriate corrections for self-absorption and attenuation of neutrons in<br />

the sample holder. Experimental parameters and results will be presented and discussed. This work was<br />

supported by the Federal Ministry for Education and Research, BMBF, Germany<br />

DF 3 4:20 PM<br />

Impact of Prompt-Neutron Corrections on Final Fission-Fragment Distributions<br />

A. Al-Adili, S. Pomp<br />

Division of Applied Nuclear Physics, Uppsala University, S-751 20 Uppsala, Sweden<br />

F.-J. Hambsch, S. Oberstedt<br />

European Commission, Joint Research Centre IRMM, B-2440 Geel, Belgium<br />

The determination of post-neutron fragment yields has a great impact on the reliable assessment of the<br />

nuclear waste inventory and on the correct prediction of delayed neutron pre-cursor yields. A large number<br />

of fission yields, included in evaluated nuclear data libraries, were measured without the knowledge on the<br />

neutron emission as a function of fragment mass ¯ν(A). Instead, ¯ν(A) had to be parametrized based on a<br />

few known reactions on e. g. 233,235 U and 239 Pu. The prompt neutron multiplicity is a crucial quantity<br />

in nuclear fission and is a function of mass, TKE and incident neutron energy, ν(A, T KE, En). Although<br />

it is well known that the total number of prompt fission neutrons, ¯νtot, increases with incident neutron<br />

energy, the enthralling question has always been, how the additional excitation energy is shared between<br />

the fission fragments. Traditionally, the excess neutrons are assumed to be distributed equally across the<br />

mass distribution. But a few experiments have shown that the extra neutrons are exclusively emitted by<br />

the heavy fragments [1, 2]. Recently, several theoretical works tried to explain these observations [3-5].<br />

For instance, in the ”energy-sorting” process proposed in Ref. [4], the heavy fragment is assumed to have<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!