26.02.2013 Views

Program - Brookhaven National Laboratory

Program - Brookhaven National Laboratory

Program - Brookhaven National Laboratory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

LA-UR-12-23712<br />

The ENDF/B-VII.1 [1,2] nuclear data library was released in December, 2011 ... five years after the release<br />

of ENDF/B-VII.0 [3]. Integral data testing of the library has relied heavily upon Critical Safety benchmarks<br />

defined in the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project Handbook [4]. We<br />

have calculated the critical eigenvalue for hundreds of these benchmarks, spanning a range of fuel systems<br />

( 233 U, HEU, LEU, 239 Pu) under various moderating and reflected conditions. The desired outcome of any<br />

critical eigenvalue calculation will be (i) accurate results obtained with previous evaluated cross sections<br />

should remain accurate, irrespective of any changes in the underlying evaluated cross section files; (ii) poor<br />

results should be improved if there are substantial changes in the underlying cross section evaluations, and<br />

(iii) poor results should not improve if there have not been any changes in the underlying nuclear data.<br />

We show examples of all three outcomes, with particular emphasis on benchmarks containing 233 U, 239 Pu,<br />

beryllium and lead. Benchmarks containing these materials were not calculated as accurately as desired<br />

with ENDF/B-VII.0 and they received limited attention during the development of ENDF/B-VII.1. We<br />

now have a several year window were evaluators and data validators can iterate on potentially improved<br />

data sets that could become incorporated in the next generation evaluated data file. We also show comparisons<br />

between the latest ENDF/B-VII.1, JEFF-3.1.2 and JENDL-4.0 libraries. There remain significant<br />

differences in selected cross sections from the “Big 3” nuclides, 235,238 U and 239 Pu that the international<br />

community should work to resolve in the next several years. In some instances, the bare 239 Pu sphere<br />

commonly known as Jezebel for example, accurate eigenvalues are obtained with all three libraries. This<br />

suggests that at least one, and more likely all three, evaluated files is yielding an accurate eigenvalue for<br />

the wrong reason; an observation that casts doubt on the predictive capability of all three files.<br />

[1] M.B.Chadwick et al., “ENDF/B-VII.1 Nuclear Data for Science and Technology: Cross Sections, Covariances,<br />

Fission Yields and Decay Data,” Nuclear Data Sheets, 112, 2887 (2011). [2] A.C.Kahler et al.,<br />

“ENDF/B-VII.1 Neutron Cross Section Data Testing with Critical Assembly and Reactor Experiments,”<br />

Nuclear Data Sheets, 112, 2997 (2011). [3] M.B.Chadwick et al., “ENDF/B-VII.0: Next Generation Evaluated<br />

Nuclear Data Library for Nuclear Science and Technology,” Nuclear Data Sheets, 107, 2931 (2006).<br />

[4] J.B.Briggs, editor, “International Handbook of Evaluated Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiments,”/<br />

NEA/NSC/DOC(95)03, revised and updated annually.<br />

FE 2 11:00 AM<br />

Comparison of ENDF/B-VII.1 and ENDF/B-VII.0 Results for the Expanded Criticality<br />

Validation Suite for MCNP and for Selected Additional Criticality Benchmarks<br />

Russell D. Mosteller<br />

(retired)<br />

Results obtained with the ENDF/B-VII.0 and ENDF/B-VII.1 nuclear data libraries are compared for a<br />

substantial number of criticality benchmarks. Results from the ENDF/B-VI nuclear data library also<br />

are included for historical perspective. The calculations were performed with the MCNP Monte Carlo<br />

code. The cases include the 119 benchmarks in the expanded criticality validation suite for MCNP and 23<br />

additional benchmarks. Specifications for all of the benchmarks are taken from the International Handbook<br />

of Evaluated Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiments. The full paper will contain the results for all 142<br />

benchmarks. The 119 benchmarks in the expanded criticality validation suite are divided into five classes<br />

of fuel: 233 U, highly enriched uranium (HEU), intermediate enriched uranium (IEU), low enriched uranium<br />

(LEU), and plutonium. The 233 U, HEU, IEU, and plutonium benchmarks are subdivided farther according<br />

to spectrum – fast, intermediate, or thermal. The LEU category includes only thermal cases, since LEU<br />

can reach a critical condition only with a thermal spectrum. Succinct descriptions of each of the 119 cases<br />

88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!