Program - Brookhaven National Laboratory
Program - Brookhaven National Laboratory
Program - Brookhaven National Laboratory
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
LA-UR-12-23712<br />
The ENDF/B-VII.1 [1,2] nuclear data library was released in December, 2011 ... five years after the release<br />
of ENDF/B-VII.0 [3]. Integral data testing of the library has relied heavily upon Critical Safety benchmarks<br />
defined in the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project Handbook [4]. We<br />
have calculated the critical eigenvalue for hundreds of these benchmarks, spanning a range of fuel systems<br />
( 233 U, HEU, LEU, 239 Pu) under various moderating and reflected conditions. The desired outcome of any<br />
critical eigenvalue calculation will be (i) accurate results obtained with previous evaluated cross sections<br />
should remain accurate, irrespective of any changes in the underlying evaluated cross section files; (ii) poor<br />
results should be improved if there are substantial changes in the underlying cross section evaluations, and<br />
(iii) poor results should not improve if there have not been any changes in the underlying nuclear data.<br />
We show examples of all three outcomes, with particular emphasis on benchmarks containing 233 U, 239 Pu,<br />
beryllium and lead. Benchmarks containing these materials were not calculated as accurately as desired<br />
with ENDF/B-VII.0 and they received limited attention during the development of ENDF/B-VII.1. We<br />
now have a several year window were evaluators and data validators can iterate on potentially improved<br />
data sets that could become incorporated in the next generation evaluated data file. We also show comparisons<br />
between the latest ENDF/B-VII.1, JEFF-3.1.2 and JENDL-4.0 libraries. There remain significant<br />
differences in selected cross sections from the “Big 3” nuclides, 235,238 U and 239 Pu that the international<br />
community should work to resolve in the next several years. In some instances, the bare 239 Pu sphere<br />
commonly known as Jezebel for example, accurate eigenvalues are obtained with all three libraries. This<br />
suggests that at least one, and more likely all three, evaluated files is yielding an accurate eigenvalue for<br />
the wrong reason; an observation that casts doubt on the predictive capability of all three files.<br />
[1] M.B.Chadwick et al., “ENDF/B-VII.1 Nuclear Data for Science and Technology: Cross Sections, Covariances,<br />
Fission Yields and Decay Data,” Nuclear Data Sheets, 112, 2887 (2011). [2] A.C.Kahler et al.,<br />
“ENDF/B-VII.1 Neutron Cross Section Data Testing with Critical Assembly and Reactor Experiments,”<br />
Nuclear Data Sheets, 112, 2997 (2011). [3] M.B.Chadwick et al., “ENDF/B-VII.0: Next Generation Evaluated<br />
Nuclear Data Library for Nuclear Science and Technology,” Nuclear Data Sheets, 107, 2931 (2006).<br />
[4] J.B.Briggs, editor, “International Handbook of Evaluated Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiments,”/<br />
NEA/NSC/DOC(95)03, revised and updated annually.<br />
FE 2 11:00 AM<br />
Comparison of ENDF/B-VII.1 and ENDF/B-VII.0 Results for the Expanded Criticality<br />
Validation Suite for MCNP and for Selected Additional Criticality Benchmarks<br />
Russell D. Mosteller<br />
(retired)<br />
Results obtained with the ENDF/B-VII.0 and ENDF/B-VII.1 nuclear data libraries are compared for a<br />
substantial number of criticality benchmarks. Results from the ENDF/B-VI nuclear data library also<br />
are included for historical perspective. The calculations were performed with the MCNP Monte Carlo<br />
code. The cases include the 119 benchmarks in the expanded criticality validation suite for MCNP and 23<br />
additional benchmarks. Specifications for all of the benchmarks are taken from the International Handbook<br />
of Evaluated Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiments. The full paper will contain the results for all 142<br />
benchmarks. The 119 benchmarks in the expanded criticality validation suite are divided into five classes<br />
of fuel: 233 U, highly enriched uranium (HEU), intermediate enriched uranium (IEU), low enriched uranium<br />
(LEU), and plutonium. The 233 U, HEU, IEU, and plutonium benchmarks are subdivided farther according<br />
to spectrum – fast, intermediate, or thermal. The LEU category includes only thermal cases, since LEU<br />
can reach a critical condition only with a thermal spectrum. Succinct descriptions of each of the 119 cases<br />
88