Program - Brookhaven National Laboratory
Program - Brookhaven National Laboratory
Program - Brookhaven National Laboratory
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
a modified Lorentzian model (MLO) of the radiative strenght function; and integrated prompt fission<br />
neutron spectra modeling that may include emissive contributions from (n,xnf) reactions, and neutron<br />
emission from fission fragments calculated by Los Alamos or Kornilov models. Impact of the advanced<br />
modeling on inelastic scattering cross section and corresponding uncertainties is being assessed both by<br />
comparison with selected microscopic experimental data and integral criticality benchmarks including<br />
measured reaction rates (e.g. FLAPTOP and BIG TEN). Benchmark calculations provide feedback to<br />
improve the reaction modeling and reduce both model and model-parameters uncertainties. Improvement<br />
of existing libraries will be discussed.<br />
IA 2 9:15 AM<br />
Plasma Nuclear Science: Nuclear Science in Hot, Dense, and Dynamic <strong>Laboratory</strong> Plasmas<br />
D.P. McNabb, P.A. Amendt, R.N. Boyd, S.P. Hatchett, J.E. Pino, S. Quaglioni, J.R. Rygg, I.J.<br />
Thompson, Lawrence Livermore <strong>National</strong> <strong>Laboratory</strong>. D.T. Casey, J.A. Frenje, M. Gatu Johnson, M.J.-E.<br />
Manuel, N. Sinenian, A.B. Zylstra, F.H. Séguin, C.K. Li, R.D. Petrasso, Plasma Science Fusion Center,<br />
MIT. C. Forrest, V. Yu Glebov, P.B. Radha, D.D. Meyerhofer, T.C. Sangster, <strong>Laboratory</strong> for Laser<br />
Energetics, University of Rochester. A. D. Bacher, Department of Physics, Indiana University. H. W.<br />
Herrmann, Y. H. Kim, Los Alamos <strong>National</strong> <strong>Laboratory</strong>.<br />
The plasma environments created using laser-driven inertial confinement fusion implosion at the <strong>National</strong><br />
Ignition Facility [1] and OMEGA Laser Facility [2] probe new degrees of freedom in nuclear reactions and<br />
nuclear-atomic interactions. These thermal plasma environments closely resemble the burning core of a<br />
star where the reactants are ionized and the electrons are in continuum states. The fusion reactions in<br />
these plasmas can also lead to an extremely high neutron brightness, 10 orders of magnitude higher than<br />
produced in conventional accelerator and reactor facilities. However, these facilities also present challenges<br />
for nuclear astrophysics measurements because the plasma environment is a complex and dynamic system<br />
that is difficult to model. Results from three studies are presented: (1) the n-T differential elastic<br />
scattering cross section at En = 14 MeV [3], (2) the stellar 3 He( 3 He,2p) 4 He (or 3He3He) reaction, the dominant<br />
energy-producing step in the solar proton-proton chain, and (3) its charge conjugate reaction, the<br />
T(t,2n) 4 He (or tt) reaction [4]. These measurements were carried out at OMEGA, where gas-filled spherical<br />
capsules were spherically irradiated with powerful lasers to compress and heat the fuel to high enough<br />
temperatures and densities for significant nuclear reactions to occur. Reactant products are measured<br />
with particle spectrometers designed to work in this special environment [5]. While the n-T differential<br />
scattering results were consistent with expectations, the results from the tt measurements are puzzling on<br />
two fronts. First, the tt rate is higher than expected based on accelerator measurements [6]. Second, in<br />
contrast to accelerator experiments conducted at CM energies above 100 keV [4], the tt neutron spectrum<br />
shows a smaller n+ 5 He reaction channel at a CM energy of 23 keV [4]. This suggests that the reaction<br />
mechanism is changing at lower energies. These results, implications and possibilities for future nuclear<br />
astrophysics measurements will be discussed. * Prepared by LLNL under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344<br />
and supported in part by NLUF (DOE), FSC (UR), US DOE, LLE, LLNL, and GA under DOE.<br />
1. G. H. Miller et al., Nucl. Fusion 44, S228 (2004). 2. T.R. Boehly et al., Optics Communications 133,<br />
495 (1997). 3. J.A. Frenje et al., Physical Review Letters 107, 122502 (2011). 4. D.T. Casey et al., Physical<br />
Review Letters 108, 075002 (2012); D.T. Casey et al., Physical Review Letters, 109, 025003 (2012).<br />
5. F.H. Séguin et al., Review of Scientific Instruments 74, 975 (2003). 6. N. Jarmie and R. E. Brown,<br />
Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and<br />
Atoms 10-11 (Part 1), 405-410 (1985).<br />
136