26.02.2013 Views

Program - Brookhaven National Laboratory

Program - Brookhaven National Laboratory

Program - Brookhaven National Laboratory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

physicist. - There is no perfect set of model parameters but there are sets better than the others, the best<br />

selected by their score values. - The quantification of the uncertainty can be approached in a global way<br />

by applying a shape of the statistical error around a reference cross section calculated using the selected<br />

sets.<br />

PR 128<br />

Covariance Matrices of Uncertainties in the ABBN Data System<br />

Olga Andrianova, Yury Golovko, Gennady Jerdev, Dmitry Zadornov, Vladimir Koscheev, Gennady<br />

Manturov, Anatoly Tsibulya, Institute for Physics and Power Engineering, Bondarenko Square 1,<br />

Obninsk 244033, Kaluga Region, Russia.<br />

The paper presents description of covariance matrices of uncertainties in the current version of the ABBN<br />

group data system, which was obtained from the RUSFOND2010 nuclear data files. The ABBN covariance<br />

data are compared to similar data from other sources. The uncertainties caused by nuclear data for the<br />

most important neutron-physical parameters of several test models of perspective liquid metal-cooled fast<br />

reactors were calculated using the ABBN covariance data. The analysis of the major contributions to the<br />

estimated uncertainties was fulfilled and results are discussed.<br />

Corresponding author: Genndy Manturov<br />

1.A.A. Blyskavka, G.N. Manturov, M.N. Nikolaev, A.M. Tsiboulia. “Multigroup Monte Carlo Code MMK-<br />

KENO,” Preprint IPPE-3145, Institute for Physics and Power Engineering, Obninsk (2009). (In Russian.)<br />

2.“Multigroup Constant Set for Calculation of Neutron and Photon Radiation Fields and Functionals, Including<br />

the CONSYST2 <strong>Program</strong>,” ORNL. RSICC DLC-182 (1995). 3.http://www-nds.iaea.org/exfor/endf.htm<br />

PR 129<br />

Adequate Treatment of Correlated Experimental Data in Nuclear Data Evaluations<br />

Avoiding Pelle’s Pertinent Puzzle<br />

D. Neudecker, Los Alamos <strong>National</strong> <strong>Laboratory</strong>, T-2, Theoretical Division Nuclear and Particle Physics,<br />

Astrophysics & Cosmology. R. Fruehwirth, Institute of High Energy Physics of the Austrian Academy of<br />

Sciences, Nikolsdorfer Gasse 18, A-1050 Vienna, Austria. H. Leeb, Institute of Atomic and Subatomic<br />

Physics, Wiedner Hauptstrasse 8-10, A-1040 Vienna, Austria.<br />

Peelle’s Pertinent Puzzle is a long-standing problem of nuclear data evaluation: Namely, one obtains unexpected<br />

mean values and variances when combining experimental data affected by statistical and systematic<br />

uncertainties by weighing with an experimental covariance matrix. This occurs for non-linear functions of<br />

statistical quantities, e.g. for a product. In [1], it was shown in terms of Bayesian Statistics that Peelle’s<br />

Pertinent Puzzle is primarily caused by an improper estimate of the experimental covariance matrix.<br />

However, this was only demonstrated by means of two experimental data points for the same theoretical<br />

quantity. In this contribution, the solution is tested for more than one theoretical quantity and is applied<br />

to a typical nuclear data problem.<br />

[1] ”Peelle’s Pertinent Puzzle and its Solution,” R. Fruehwirth, D. Neudecker, H. Leeb, EPJ Web of Conferences<br />

00008, 27 (2012)<br />

PR 130<br />

328

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!