08.03.2013 Views

The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society

The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society

The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

112 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti<br />

bound to the soil, but because they could not be removed from it<br />

at the will <strong>of</strong> their lord. It was not a restriction upon their<br />

libert}-, but a privilege that gave them their peculiar name.<br />

<strong>The</strong> native man was the tenant who cultivated the soil, and<br />

who possessed, all over <strong>Scotland</strong>, but especially in the Highlands,<br />

a definite and recognized estate in the soil. So long as he performed<br />

his services he was not to be removed from his land, nor<br />

could the lord exact from him a higher rent or a greater proportion<br />

<strong>of</strong> labour than what was due, and <strong>of</strong> right accustomed to be<br />

given.<br />

<strong>The</strong>ir great privilege, therefore was, that they held their<br />

farms by an inherent right which was not derived from their lord,<br />

and from which he could not remove them. And in this way we<br />

find that all old Highland alienations <strong>of</strong> land included the<br />

" Nativis ad dictas terras pertinentibus." <strong>The</strong> servi and fugitivi<br />

were the cottars and actual labourers <strong>of</strong> the soil, who were<br />

absolute slaves, and posses.sed no legal rights either <strong>of</strong> station or<br />

property. It is very remarkable, however, that the servi or slaves<br />

were confined entirely to the Lowlands <strong>of</strong> <strong>Scotland</strong>, not a trace<br />

as the existence <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> them being found in the Highlands ; and<br />

slavery <strong>of</strong> this description invariably points out a conquered<br />

people under the domination <strong>of</strong> another race, it forms a strongargument<br />

for the <strong>Highlanders</strong> being the original inhabitants <strong>of</strong><br />

the country. Where a clan had retained their original property<br />

without addition ordiminution, the whole <strong>of</strong> the families connected<br />

with it, from the Tighern to the native man, were unquestionably<br />

<strong>of</strong> the same race, and although the Tighern may have held his<br />

lands <strong>of</strong> the crown as a Norman baron, yet the Gaelic system <strong>of</strong><br />

tenure would be preserved in his barony in all its purity. When<br />

a Norman baron obtained by succession or otherwise a Highland<br />

property, the Gaelic nativi remained in actual possession <strong>of</strong> the<br />

soil under him, but at the same time paid their calpes to the<br />

natural chief <strong>of</strong> their clan and followed him to war. When a<br />

Highland chief, however, acquired, by the operation <strong>of</strong> the feudal<br />

succession, an additional property which had not been previously<br />

in the possession <strong>of</strong> his clan, he found it possessed by the nativi<br />

<strong>of</strong> another race. If these nativi belonged to another clan which<br />

still existed in independence, and if tliey chose to remain on the<br />

property, they did so at the risk <strong>of</strong> being placed in a perilous<br />

situation should a feud arise between the two clans. But if they

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!