08.03.2013 Views

The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society

The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society

The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

198 THE HIGHLANDERS [part ii<br />

immemorial ; and it is therefore scarcely possible to suppose<br />

that they could have entered the country subsequently to the<br />

ninth century. But besides the strong presumption that the<br />

Macdonalds are <strong>of</strong> Pictish descent, and formed a part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

great tribe <strong>of</strong> the Gallgael, .ve fortunately possess distinct<br />

authority for both <strong>of</strong> these facts. For the former, John Elder<br />

includes the Macdonalds among the ancient Stoke, who still<br />

retained the tradition <strong>of</strong> a Pictish descent, in opposition to<br />

the later tradition insisted in by the Scottish clergy, and this<br />

is sufficient evidence for the fact that the oldest tradition<br />

among<br />

the Macdonalds must have been one <strong>of</strong> a Pictish<br />

origin. <strong>The</strong> latter appears equally clear from the last mention<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Gallgael, in which they are described as the inhabitants<br />

and as these were at<br />

<strong>of</strong> Argyll, Kintyre, Arran, and Man ;<br />

this very period the exact territories which Somerled possessed,<br />

it follows <strong>of</strong> necessity that the Macdonalds were the same<br />

people.<br />

<strong>The</strong> identity <strong>of</strong> the Gallgael with the tribe ov-er which<br />

Somerled ruled as hereditary chief, being thus established,<br />

the independent kings <strong>of</strong> the Gallgael must in all probability<br />

have been his ancestors, and ought to be found in the old<br />

genealogies <strong>of</strong> the family. <strong>The</strong> last independent king <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Gallgael was Suibne, the son <strong>of</strong> Kenneth, whose death isrecorded<br />

in 1034, and exactly contemporary with this Suibne,<br />

the MS. <strong>of</strong> 1450, places a Suibne among the ancestors <strong>of</strong><br />

Somerled ; accordingly, as the Gallgael and the Macdonalds<br />

were the same tribe, the two Suibnes must have been meant<br />

for the same person. But the MS. makes the name <strong>of</strong> Suibne's<br />

father to have been Nialgusa, and there does not occur a<br />

Kenneth in the genealogy at all. As an authority upon this<br />

point, Tighernac must be preferred, and his account is corroborated<br />

by most <strong>of</strong> the old Scottish writers, who mention the<br />

existence at that time <strong>of</strong> a Kenneth, Thane <strong>of</strong> the Isles ; and<br />

farther, at the very same period, as we have seen, one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

northern Maormors who opposed Sigurd, earl <strong>of</strong> Orkney, was<br />

named Kenneth. We must consequently receive Tighernac's<br />

account as the most accurate ; but above Kenneth we find<br />

the two accounts again different, for there is no resemblance<br />

whatever between the previous kings <strong>of</strong> the Gallgael and the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!