08.03.2013 Views

The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society

The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society

The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAP. V] OF SCOTLAND 65<br />

tribe. Now, it is remarkable that we can distinctly trace this<br />

change in the relative position <strong>of</strong> these tribes at a very early<br />

period in the Irish Annals. In the year 666 Tighernac mentions<br />

the death <strong>of</strong> Eacha, King <strong>of</strong> the Midland Cruithne. <strong>The</strong><br />

Cruithne, we have seen, was the peculiar name <strong>of</strong> the northern<br />

Picts, and as <strong>of</strong> all the tribes mentioned by Ptolemy that <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Caledonii proper is the only one which could be called Midland,<br />

it is plain that these kings <strong>of</strong> the Midland Cruithne were the<br />

chiefs <strong>of</strong> that tribe. Now, we find a singular change in their<br />

title within eighty years after this date, for in 739 Tighernac<br />

mentions the death <strong>of</strong> Talorgan, King <strong>of</strong> Atholl. Atholl was<br />

always a part <strong>of</strong> the territories <strong>of</strong> the Caledonians proper, and<br />

consequently, when we find the chiefs <strong>of</strong> that tribe preserving<br />

<strong>of</strong> Midland<br />

their title <strong>of</strong> king, hut changing the designation<br />

Cruithne for the less extended title <strong>of</strong> Atholl, we can have little<br />

difficulty in inferring that they had between these two periods<br />

been deprived <strong>of</strong> the northern portion <strong>of</strong> their territories, and<br />

confined principally to that district. This change is confirmed<br />

by our finding distinct evidence <strong>of</strong> the extension <strong>of</strong> the eastern<br />

tribes towards the west in 668, for at that date Tighernac<br />

mentions the departure <strong>of</strong> the Gens Gartnaidh with the people<br />

<strong>of</strong> Skye for Ireland. <strong>The</strong> western position <strong>of</strong> the former tribe<br />

is sufficiently indicated by that <strong>of</strong> the latter, and the coincidence<br />

between the departure <strong>of</strong> that tribe for Ireland, and the loss<br />

<strong>of</strong> their northern districts by the Caledonii, is sufficient to warrant<br />

us in concluding that these events were connected, and that<br />

the expulsion <strong>of</strong> the Gens Gartnaidh, and the death <strong>of</strong> Eacha,<br />

the king <strong>of</strong> the Midland Cruithne, was probably effected by<br />

the conquest <strong>of</strong> the latter together with the Vacomagi by the<br />

Cantese, and the seizure by that tribe <strong>of</strong> the northern part <strong>of</strong><br />

their territories. In this way the V'acomagi would be confined<br />

to the earldom <strong>of</strong> Marr, the Caledonii to that <strong>of</strong> Atholl, while<br />

the Cantese would form the earldom <strong>of</strong> Moray and as ; Tighernac<br />

mentions in 670 the return <strong>of</strong> the Gens Gartnaidh from Ireland,<br />

they probably occupied the district previously possessed by the<br />

Canteai, and which afterwards formed the earldom <strong>of</strong> Ross.<br />

<strong>The</strong> same event will also account for the next variation in the<br />

possession <strong>of</strong> these tribes. In Ptolemy's time the southern<br />

division <strong>of</strong> modern Argyll was inhabited by the Epidii, the<br />

E

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!