08.03.2013 Views

The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society

The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society

The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAP. II] OFSCOTLAND 23<br />

intra eosdem montes habent sedes multo ante tempore (ut<br />

perhibent) relicto errore idolatria^ fidem veritatis acceperant." ^<br />

<strong>The</strong> northern Picts mentioned by Bede, in all probability<br />

correspond with the Dicaledones <strong>of</strong> the Roman authors, for the<br />

Dicaledones, from their name, apparently extended along the<br />

Deucaledonian or Northern Sea. This distinction <strong>of</strong> the Pictish<br />

nation into the two great tribes <strong>of</strong> the northern Picts or<br />

Dicaledones and southern Picts, or Vecturiones, took its origin<br />

probably from incidental circumstances, and was afterwards<br />

perpetuated and increased b}- the difference <strong>of</strong> religion between<br />

them during the period from the conversion <strong>of</strong> the southern<br />

Picts by Ninian, and that <strong>of</strong> the northern Picts by St. Columba,<br />

as well as by the superior progress in civilization, which the<br />

prior conversion <strong>of</strong> the southern Picts would naturally give rise<br />

to. <strong>The</strong> same tw<strong>of</strong>old division <strong>of</strong> the Picts can be traced subsequent<br />

to the time <strong>of</strong> St. Columba in Tighernac and the other<br />

Irish annalists. In Tighernac, we find the Picts sometimes<br />

termed Picti, at other times Cruithne and Piccardach :<br />

but<br />

although the last two are occasionally called Picti, yet we find<br />

a marked distinction at all times drawn between them, and<br />

occasionally we find them even having kings independent <strong>of</strong><br />

each other. As an instance, in the \-ear 731, Tighernac men-<br />

tions a battle " between Brude, the son <strong>of</strong> Angus, and Talorcan,<br />

"<br />

the son <strong>of</strong> Congusa. Brude conquers, but Talorcan escapes ;<br />

and in 734, we find it mentioned, that Talorcan, the son <strong>of</strong><br />

Congusa, was taken by his own brother, and given over by him<br />

into the hands <strong>of</strong> the PiCCARDACH, thus making a complete<br />

distinction between the Piccardach and the other Picts, <strong>of</strong> whom<br />

Talorcan Mac Congusa was one. Again< in 729, Tighernac<br />

calls Angus, the father -<strong>of</strong> Brude above-mentioned, "Ri na<br />

Piccardach," or King <strong>of</strong> the Piccardach, while, at that time,<br />

Drust was king <strong>of</strong> the Picts, and<br />

throne <strong>of</strong> the Picts till the year 731.<br />

Angus did not attain the<br />

We may also remark, that<br />

whenever Tighernac has the word Piccardach, the annals <strong>of</strong><br />

Ulster use the word Pictores in Latin, instead <strong>of</strong> Picti, the<br />

name usually applied by them to the Picts. <strong>The</strong>se words<br />

Piccardach and Pictores have generally been thought synony-<br />

•<br />

Bede, b. 3, c. 4.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!