08.03.2013 Views

The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society

The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society

The Highlanders of Scotland - Clan Strachan Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

40 THE HIGHLANDERS [parti<br />

must have been descended either from the Scottish or the Pictish<br />

Hnc. But the name <strong>of</strong> <strong>Scotland</strong> appears never to have been<br />

applied to North Britain before that date, but rather to have<br />

subsequently extended itself gradually over the whole country,<br />

and to have at last superseded the more ancient appellation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Albion or Albania. It is consequently to be inferred<br />

that the later kings were <strong>of</strong> the Scottish race, and that<br />

the Scots had obtained a preponderance over the Picts ;<br />

besides this inference, which results naturally from the argument,<br />

the whole authorities for the early history <strong>of</strong> <strong>Scotland</strong><br />

concur in establishing the fact, that Kenneth, the first<br />

monarch who ruled over the whole country, was <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Scottish race.<br />

Third.—When we consider that the name <strong>of</strong> <strong>Scotland</strong> did<br />

not spread rapidly over the country, but that it was many<br />

centuries before that appellation comprehended the whole <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Scotland</strong>, and also that the first four or five kings <strong>of</strong> the line<br />

<strong>of</strong> Kenneth are termed by the Irish annalists kings <strong>of</strong> the Picts,<br />

and not <strong>of</strong> the Scots, or <strong>of</strong> <strong>Scotland</strong>, we must infer that the<br />

effects produced by the conquest did not extend to the whole <strong>of</strong><br />

the Picts, but that a very considerable part <strong>of</strong> them must have<br />

remained altogether unaffected by the invasion, and that the<br />

name <strong>of</strong> <strong>Scotland</strong> must have spread over the country, rather<br />

from the fact <strong>of</strong> its kings being derived from that race, and<br />

<strong>of</strong> their political pre-eminence, than from an actual subjugation<br />

<strong>of</strong> all the Pictish tribes, as feigned by the Scottish historians ;<br />

a theory the absurdity <strong>of</strong> which it is impossible not to perceive,<br />

if we look at the state <strong>of</strong> <strong>Scotland</strong> in 731, and the very great<br />

superiority <strong>of</strong> the Picts over the Scots in power, extent <strong>of</strong><br />

territor)', and in numbers.<br />

Fourth.— If we find, subsequent to the year 843, or the date<br />

<strong>of</strong> the supposed conquest, any part <strong>of</strong> the Pictish nation appear-<br />

ing as a body, under a peculiar national name, and apparently<br />

distinguished by that name from the rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>Scotland</strong>, it is<br />

manifest that that tribe could have formed no part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Scottish conquest, and must have retained their territory and<br />

their independence, notwithstanding the subjugation <strong>of</strong> the rest<br />

<strong>of</strong> the countr)^ But we find from the Irish annalists, that as<br />

late as the year 865, the northern Picts appear as a distinct

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!