21.03.2013 Views

Volume 16–1.pdf

Volume 16–1.pdf

Volume 16–1.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TYPOGRAPHIC<br />

COMMUNICATIONS TODAY<br />

merican<br />

eszgn<br />

zoneers<br />

lthough the emi-<br />

gres from Europe<br />

numerically<br />

dominated the<br />

field of distin-<br />

guished designers<br />

in the United States, in the late<br />

1930s and the 1940s there were a<br />

small number of Americanborn-and-educated<br />

designers<br />

whose work equaled the best<br />

created anywhere in the world.<br />

Their influence was to be profound<br />

and enduring, and their<br />

ranks were to be swelled until the<br />

27 The egg-shaped copy block discusses<br />

the life of malarial parasites. Red<br />

superior numbers in the text key the copy<br />

to the pictures. For Scope magazine, the<br />

Upjohn Company, No. 7, June 1944.<br />

Lester Beall.<br />

28 Here Bradbury Thompson catches the<br />

evolution of a sneeze in a powerful and<br />

witty spread that borders on great<br />

surrealistic art, as it brings sound to the<br />

printed page. Westvaco Inspirations, No.<br />

177, 1949.<br />

number of top-flight typographic<br />

designers in the United States<br />

transformed the country from a<br />

Johnny-come-lately in contemporary<br />

design, to the position of<br />

leadership it enjoys today. Two of<br />

these American design pioneers,<br />

Paul Rand and Bradbury<br />

Thompson, are still active in the<br />

mid-1980s as designers and<br />

teachers. Here we will look at<br />

some of their early work, and the<br />

work of Lester Beall and William<br />

Golden. Together they<br />

helped set a new tone and personality<br />

for American typographic<br />

design in the '40s.<br />

American born and bred<br />

designers like Beall, Golden,<br />

Rand, and Thompson, though<br />

deeply influenced by the 20th<br />

century European art movements<br />

and European designers,<br />

were also influenced by contemporary<br />

American culture, by<br />

Thomas Hart Benton, Reginald<br />

Marsh, Edward Hopper, Alfred<br />

Ke chop o o<br />

Stieglitz, Georgia O'Keeffe, to<br />

name just a few. With hindsight<br />

one can see how they blended the<br />

best of European and American<br />

art developments to evolve typographic<br />

design that was vigorous<br />

yet clear, derivative yet original,<br />

beautiful yet functional.<br />

The Follow-Up Was Fast<br />

and Powerful<br />

Lester Beall, William<br />

Golden, Paul Rand and Bradbury<br />

Thompson were the first of<br />

the American design pioneers<br />

in the '30s and '40s. Just a few<br />

years after their careers had<br />

started, and while the émigré<br />

designers from Europe were<br />

establishing themselves in the<br />

United States, a larger group<br />

of Americans were striking<br />

new design chords with new<br />

personalities and their fresh<br />

approaches to blending vigor<br />

and clarity for communication<br />

and typographic design. Their<br />

work, the later work of Paul<br />

Rand and Bradbury Thompson,<br />

and the work of many other<br />

designers in the United States<br />

and abroad are reviewed in<br />

Chapter XIII of Typographic<br />

Communications Today.<br />

29 This bell swings in process colors and<br />

the type comes alive with it. Bradbury<br />

Thompson, Westvaco Inspirations, No.<br />

194, 1953.<br />

30 A multiple exposure of a saxophone<br />

player and off-register overprinting in<br />

primary colors vitalizes image. Bradbury<br />

Thompson, Westvaco Inspirations, No.<br />

210, 1958.<br />

Paul Rand<br />

Paul Rand's professional<br />

career began in 1937, when, at<br />

the age of 23, he became art<br />

director for Apparel Arts magazine<br />

and then of Esquire.<br />

In his book, Thoughts on<br />

Design, Rand wrote:<br />

"Graphic design—which<br />

fulfills esthetic needs, complies<br />

with the laws of form and the<br />

exigencies of two-dimensional<br />

space: which speaks in semiotics,<br />

sans-serifs, and geometries;<br />

which abstracts, transforms,<br />

translates, rotates, dilates,<br />

repeats, mirrors, groups, and<br />

regroups—is not good design if<br />

it is irrelevant.<br />

"Graphic design—which<br />

evokes the symmetria of Vitruvius,<br />

the dynamic symmetry of<br />

Hambidge, the symmetry of<br />

Mondrian; which is a good<br />

gestalt; which is generated by<br />

intuition or by computer, by<br />

invention or by a system of coordinates—is<br />

not good design<br />

if it does not co-operate as an<br />

instrument in the service of<br />

communication.<br />

"Visual communications of<br />

any kind, whether persuasive<br />

or informative, from billboards<br />

to birth announcements, should<br />

be seen as the embodiment of form<br />

and function: the integration of<br />

the beautiful and the useful...<br />

"Ideally, beauty and utility<br />

are mutually generative. In<br />

the past, rarely was beauty an<br />

end in itself The magnificent<br />

stained glass windows of<br />

Chartres were no less utilitarian<br />

than was the Parthenon or the<br />

Pyramid of Cheops. The function<br />

of the exterior decoration of<br />

the great Gothic cathedrals was<br />

to invite entry; the rose windows<br />

inside provided the spiritual<br />

mood. Interpreted in the light of<br />

our own experiences, this philosophy<br />

still prevails:"<br />

A New Way of Seeing...<br />

New Ways of Showing<br />

The tremendous impact of<br />

Bradbury Thompsons typographics<br />

developed through the<br />

pages of Westvaco Inspirations,<br />

a four-color magazine demonstrating<br />

the capabilities qfprinting<br />

papers. Thompson combined<br />

a hands-on knowledge of typography<br />

and printing with an

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!