27.03.2013 Views

International Handbook of Clinical Hypnosis - E-Lib FK UWKS

International Handbook of Clinical Hypnosis - E-Lib FK UWKS

International Handbook of Clinical Hypnosis - E-Lib FK UWKS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HYPNOSIS AND DEPRESSION 131<br />

THE DEFINITION OF HYPNOSIS<br />

Yapko 1992) argues that the discrepancy in opinion about the value <strong>of</strong> hypnosis in<br />

the treatment <strong>of</strong> depression can, in part, be understood by variations in the model<br />

<strong>of</strong> hypnosis being utilized. He describes three general models: traditional, standardized,<br />

and utilization. Other workers distinguish between directive and nondirective<br />

or Ericksonian techniques. The opposition to the use <strong>of</strong> hypnosis in<br />

depression is primarily associated with the traditional, standardized or directive<br />

approaches and hence Yapko 1992) argues that the association is a function <strong>of</strong> the<br />

model <strong>of</strong> hypnosis used rather than <strong>of</strong> hypnosis per se. This point <strong>of</strong> view suggests<br />

the empirical question <strong>of</strong> whether one approach to working with depressed<br />

individuals is more useful than another.<br />

THE GOALS OF HYPNOTIC INTERVENTIONS<br />

Examination <strong>of</strong> published accounts suggests that, in addition to differences in<br />

hypnotic techniques, there is a great deal <strong>of</strong> variation in what therapists actually do<br />

with hypnosis in the management <strong>of</strong> depression. A review <strong>of</strong> the available<br />

documented case material indicates that there are a range <strong>of</strong> therapeutic goals<br />

either speci®cally stated or implied by the model <strong>of</strong> therapy associated with the use<br />

<strong>of</strong> hypnosis. <strong>Hypnosis</strong> is a tool, not a therapeutic model, and has been used to<br />

facilitate a range <strong>of</strong> different therapeutic approaches. The bulk <strong>of</strong> the published<br />

literature consists <strong>of</strong> case reports, <strong>of</strong>ten providing minimal detail <strong>of</strong> actual<br />

therapeutic practice and no objective documentation <strong>of</strong> outcome.<br />

THE SUGGESTION OF SYMPTOM REMOVAL<br />

Very few clinicians describe a direct, symptom removal approach to the management<br />

<strong>of</strong> depression. Crasilneck & Hall 1985) state that `we are careful to avoid a<br />

symptom removal approach' p. 323). Yapko 1992) considers that suggesting a<br />

symptom away is valid as it serves as `pattern interruption' but is inappropriate<br />

therapy unless it is also accompanied by `pattern building', the establishment <strong>of</strong><br />

new choices and behaviours p. 52).<br />

Milton Erickson's described by Alexander, 1982) approach to the management<br />

<strong>of</strong> suicidal depression in a young woman is an elegant, indirect approach allowing a<br />

suggestion about the relief <strong>of</strong> pain to generalize to `the much more pr<strong>of</strong>ound and<br />

deeply disturbing depression' p. 219).<br />

BEHAVIOR CHANGE OR SKILLS ENHANCEMENT<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the most comprehensively described treatment strategies which includes<br />

these aspects is Alladin's 1994) Cognitive Dissociative Model <strong>of</strong> non-endogenous

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!