International Handbook of Clinical Hypnosis - E-Lib FK UWKS
International Handbook of Clinical Hypnosis - E-Lib FK UWKS
International Handbook of Clinical Hypnosis - E-Lib FK UWKS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
66 INTERNATIONAL HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL HYPNOSIS<br />
blood ¯ow rCBF), positron emission tomography PET), single photon emission<br />
computer tomography SPECT) and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging<br />
fMRI).<br />
Consistently, regional cerebral metabolism studies [unlike EEG studies reviewed<br />
above] have reported no waking differences between low and highly hypnotizable<br />
persons.A robust ®nding has been that highs show increases in cerebral metabolism<br />
in certain brain regions during hypnosis for reviews, see Crawford, 1994a,b,<br />
1996; Crawford & Gruzelier, 1992).This has been found in normally healthy<br />
Crawford, Gur, Skolnick, Gur & Benson, 1993; De Benedittis & Longostreui,<br />
1988; Meyer, Diehl, Ulrich & Meinig, 1989) and psychiatric Walter, 1992;<br />
Halama, 1989, 1990) populations.Given that increased blood ¯ow and metabolism<br />
may be associated with increased mental effort Frith, 1991), these data suggest<br />
hypnosis may involve enhanced cognitive effort.<br />
Among healthy individuals, De Benedittis and Longostreui 1988) found highs<br />
but not lows showed increases in brain metabolism during hypnosis.Using the<br />
xenon inhalation method, Crawford, Gur et al.1993) found substantial increases in<br />
rCBF during hypnosis rest; ischemic pain with and without suggested analgesia)<br />
in highs but not lows.During rest while reviewing past memories <strong>of</strong> a trip taken,<br />
fCBF enhancements in the anterior, parietal, temporal and temporo-posterior<br />
regions ranged from 13 to 28%, with the largest being in the bilateral temporal area<br />
in highs unpublished data).Among hypnotically responsive individuals, Meyer et<br />
al.1989) found global increases <strong>of</strong> rCBF in both hemispheres during hypnotically<br />
suggested arm levitation.An additional activation <strong>of</strong> the temporal centers was<br />
observed during acoustic attention.Under hypnotically narrowed consciousness<br />
focus, there was `an unexplained deactivation <strong>of</strong> inferior temporal areas' p.48).<br />
Discussed in greater detail below, Crawford, Gur et al.1993) found further rCBF<br />
enhancements <strong>of</strong> orbito-frontal and somatosensory regions during hypnotic analgesia<br />
among highs only.<br />
Within a psychiatric population 16 neurotic, 1 epileptic) using SPECT, Halama<br />
1989) reported a global blood ¯ow increase during hypnosis, with those more<br />
deeply hypnotizable showing greater CBF increases than the less hypnotically<br />
responsive.During hypnosis `a cortical ``frontalization,'' takes place particularly in<br />
the right hemisphere and in higher areas 7 cm above the meato-orbito-level) more<br />
than in the deeper ones 4 cm above the meato-orbital-level)' p.19).Frontal<br />
region increases included the gyrus frontal, medial and inferior, as well as the<br />
superior and precentral gyrus regions.These are suggestive <strong>of</strong> greater involvement<br />
<strong>of</strong> the frontal attentional system during hypnosis.By contrast, there was a signi®cant<br />
decrease in brain metabolism in the left hemisphere in the gyrus temporalis<br />
and inferior region, as well as in Brodmann areas BA) 39 and 40.<br />
Hypnotic instructions i.e., inductions and suggestions) trigger a process that<br />
alters brain functional organization, a process that is moderated by hypnotic<br />
susceptibility level.No longer can we hypothesize hypnosis to be a righthemisphere<br />
task, a commonly espoused theory popular since the 1970s e.g.,