27.03.2013 Views

International Handbook of Clinical Hypnosis - E-Lib FK UWKS

International Handbook of Clinical Hypnosis - E-Lib FK UWKS

International Handbook of Clinical Hypnosis - E-Lib FK UWKS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

18<br />

<strong>International</strong> <strong>Handbook</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Clinical</strong> <strong>Hypnosis</strong>. Edited by G. D. Burrows, R. O. Stanley, P. B. Bloom<br />

Copyright # 2001 John Wiley & Sons Ltd<br />

ISBNs: 0-471-97009-3 Hardback); 0-470-84640-2 Electronic)<br />

<strong>Hypnosis</strong> and Pain<br />

LEONARD ROSE<br />

Melbourne Pain Management Clinic, Australia<br />

Many factors in¯uence a patient's response to pain, and these are as important as<br />

the extent <strong>of</strong> the physical damage causing it. They include personality, cultural<br />

background, previous experience, the signi®cance <strong>of</strong> the organ involved, and<br />

®nancial implications. Thorough assessment by history and physical examination<br />

must be considered with an evaluation <strong>of</strong> the social issues. Treating the physical<br />

component <strong>of</strong> pain without considering the psychological and emotional consequences<br />

<strong>of</strong> pain will result in less than optimal pain relief.<br />

A problem when dealing with pain is its measurement, both for diagnosis and for<br />

assessing the success <strong>of</strong> treatment. The simplest measure is the Visual Analogue<br />

Scale or VAS, a horizontal or vertical line with the ends ®xed by the statement `no<br />

pain' or `the worst pain experienced'. The McGill Pain Questionnaire MPQ)<br />

Melzack, 1975) has been well studied and validated. The MPQ consists <strong>of</strong> groups<br />

<strong>of</strong> pain descriptors forming three main categories which can be compared to the<br />

three higher centres described originally by Melzack. These include the following<br />

categories: sensory throbbing, burning, cramping, etc.); affective sickening,<br />

terrifying and blinding, etc.); evaluative annoying, miserable and unbearable, etc.).<br />

Multiple studies have con®rmed that the words chosen by the pain patient to<br />

describe their pain are important as a measure <strong>of</strong> severity, affective words being<br />

among the more important.<br />

Thus cues to the appropriate utilization <strong>of</strong> hypnotic approaches to treat pain are<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten given in the very terminology patients use to describe their pain. Even the<br />

adjectives used to describe pain may have an important role in forming the<br />

diagnosis. Pain from nerve damage is <strong>of</strong>ten described as shooting, jabbing, or like<br />

lightning; such conditions as causalgia, re¯ex sympathetic dystrophy RSD), and<br />

post-herpetic neuralgia are described as `cold ®re', or `burning ice' Merskey &<br />

Bogduk, 1994). Conditions where the pain is described as having a burning quality<br />

may respond well to the use <strong>of</strong> hypnotic suggestions <strong>of</strong> a cooling nature. In glove<br />

anaesthesia suggestions are made with imagery <strong>of</strong> cooling the affected area with<br />

snow or a cool breeze. Painful areas associated with sensations <strong>of</strong> cold or in<br />

situations where vaso-constriction has actually occurred may respond to suggestion<br />

<strong>of</strong> warmth such as `imagine you are now holding the affected area) to the warmth<br />

<strong>International</strong> <strong>Handbook</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Clinical</strong> <strong>Hypnosis</strong>. Edited by G. D. Burrows, R. O. Stanley and P. B. Bloom<br />

# 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!