27.03.2013 Views

Vietnam Primate Conservation Status Review 2002 - Hoang Lien ...

Vietnam Primate Conservation Status Review 2002 - Hoang Lien ...

Vietnam Primate Conservation Status Review 2002 - Hoang Lien ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7. <strong>Conservation</strong> policy<br />

7.1 Hunting and wildlife trade<br />

7 CONSERVATION POLICY<br />

Hunting, primarily for commercial purposes, is the principal threat to wild fauna in <strong>Vietnam</strong>. <strong>Primate</strong><br />

species particularly suffer from this activity due to their high value in wildlife markets. Urgent policy<br />

measures must be undertaken to control hunting and wildlife trade and to effectively apply the<br />

current laws.<br />

✱ Controlling gun possession. Officially a licence is required to keep and use a gun in <strong>Vietnam</strong>.<br />

However, possession of firearms is widespread in the countryside and guns are used without<br />

any licence. Several decades of war considerably increased the availability of weapons<br />

(Timmins et al. ,1998; Nadler, pers. comm.). Some minorities, such as H’mong people in<br />

northern <strong>Vietnam</strong>, also have shotguns, which they traditionally make themselves. In response<br />

to the dramatic increase in hunting, gun confiscations have been undertaken in some<br />

areas such as Phong Nha-Ke Bang (Le Xuan Canh et al., 1997b; Timmins et al., 1998;<br />

Pham Nhat & Nguyen Xuan Dang, 1999) by provincial government authorities. This policy<br />

resulted in at least a partial decrease of this form of hunting. Gun confiscation must be<br />

continued and generalised, as well as the control of firearm production. However, this<br />

activity will be useless and will probably cause more damage to wildlife unless a strict<br />

prohibition of snaring and other non-selective trapping is simultaneously undertaken.<br />

✱ Control of hunting for non-threatened animals. Hunting should not be strictly prohibited<br />

but controlled and restricted to certain species of non-threatened animal populations. For<br />

this reason, and as stipulated above, only selective hunting must be authorised. If after<br />

many years of human exploitation the balance of the ecosystem is disturbed, hunting may<br />

be necessary in the future to control the populations which could cause damage to the<br />

forest environment. For example, if the ungulate population increases too much due to the<br />

extinction of large predators.<br />

✱ Prohibition of threatened species hunting. According to <strong>Vietnam</strong>ese law (Decree No. 18/<br />

HDBT of January 17, 1992; Decree No. 48/<strong>2002</strong>/ND-CP of April 22, <strong>2002</strong> and correction<br />

3399/VPCP-NN of June 21,<strong>2002</strong>) every species of leaf monkey, gibbon and loris is considered<br />

under the highest level of protection: group IB. The law (Decree 17/<strong>2002</strong>/ND-CP of February<br />

8, <strong>2002</strong>) strictly prohibits hunting, catching, killing, purchasing, selling, storing, keeping<br />

in cages, transporting or using wild animals, including products thereof. For each violation<br />

<strong>Vietnam</strong>ese laws (Decree No. 77/CP of November 29, 1996: Decree No. 26-CP of May 7,<br />

1996 and Decree 17/<strong>2002</strong>/ND-CP of February 8, <strong>2002</strong>) enact a fine of 1 to 50 Million VND<br />

(=US$ 65-3,250) or criminal procedure. However, it does not seem that the law is effectively<br />

applied. For instance, FFI survey teams recorded that at least 13 Tonkin snub-nosed<br />

monkeys, 11 Western black-crested gibbons, 3 Eastern black-crested gibbons and 10<br />

Francois’ langurs were killed during the last five years. FZS survey teams investigated<br />

about 230 Delacour’s langurs, about 150 Cat Ba langurs and dozens of douc langurs<br />

which were killed since the law was enacted. However, no judicial procedures were enacted<br />

against the hunters responsible. Furthermore, most discoveries of animal remains were<br />

made with a representative of the local Forest Protection Department, who never appeared<br />

concerned by such evidence of illegal activity. Laws must be enforced and corresponding<br />

punishments must be effectively applied. Control of any illegal activities must occur and<br />

information on the penalties incurred for any law violation must be widely publicised.<br />

173

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!