29.03.2013 Views

volume 2 - Robert Bedrosian's Armenian History Workshop

volume 2 - Robert Bedrosian's Armenian History Workshop

volume 2 - Robert Bedrosian's Armenian History Workshop

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

302 An Action for Slander.<br />

action, saying that " Mr. Budge must defend himself<br />

in the first instance. Upon the case being decided<br />

their Lordships will consider an application for reimbursement<br />

of the cost incurred, or of so much as<br />

the Solicitor to the Treasury advises to have been<br />

properly expended." The case was tried before<br />

Mr. Justice Cave in June and July, 1893, and the hearing<br />

occupied five days ; Mr. Rassam obtained a verdict<br />

in his favour with £$0 as damages. Obviously I am<br />

not the proper person to discuss the merits of the case.<br />

It was fully reported in the daily papers and was the<br />

subject of comment in some of them on the day after<br />

its conclusion. I may here quote some portions of the<br />

leading articles in The Times and Daily News.<br />

From The Times, July 4th, 1893, p. 10.<br />

" Mr. Budge, who is now the assistant-keeper of<br />

Assyrian antiquities in the Museum, was sent out to<br />

Bagdad some years after Mr. Rassam had completed<br />

his work, and he appears to have heard rumours there<br />

which he wrongly credited. At all events, in June, 1891,<br />

a conversation took place at the Museum in which the<br />

defendant used words which, in the opinion of the jury,<br />

implied that the plaintiff was a party to the theft of<br />

antiquities, the property of the Museum. Sir Henry<br />

Layard, who was himself the first great explorer of<br />

Assyria, was present at the time, and the defendant<br />

substantially repeated the charge in a second conversation<br />

at Sir Henry Layard's house. On the first<br />

occasion, although the slanderous words were uttered<br />

in a public part of the Museum, nobody but officials<br />

of the Museum and Sir Henry appears to have been<br />

present ; on the second, the conversation, we are told,<br />

took place ' in strict confidence.' The Judge, however,<br />

laid down that although Sir Henry Layard had voluntarily<br />

done much useful work for the Museum, there<br />

was nothing in his position to make the conversation<br />

' privileged.' The fact that the second conversation<br />

took place in confidence and that Mr. Budge had been

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!