Hinduism: What Really Happenned in India (PDF) - Oration
Hinduism: What Really Happenned in India (PDF) - Oration
Hinduism: What Really Happenned in India (PDF) - Oration
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>H<strong>in</strong>duism</strong>: <strong>What</strong> <strong>Really</strong> Happened <strong>in</strong> <strong>India</strong> – M. M. N<strong>in</strong>an<br />
219<br />
what is perceived by these senses. But their validity is constra<strong>in</strong>ed with<strong>in</strong><br />
the experience of the person. They therefore focused on the senses. Like<br />
the Greek and all other ancient scientists they def<strong>in</strong>ed the four traditional<br />
elements as earth, water, fire, and air. These are the only realities.<br />
Consciousness is only a modification of these elements <strong>in</strong> their<br />
relationships with each other and arises out of the motion of matter.<br />
There are no souls apart from the body. Soul, which experience pleasure<br />
and pa<strong>in</strong>, are simply the organized qualitative aspect of matter <strong>in</strong> its<br />
position and movement. Has anyone seen a soul apart from the body?<br />
No. It is because they are the property of the body <strong>in</strong> the particular<br />
organizational form.<br />
Compare these thoughts with the modern day Marxism.<br />
The pr<strong>in</strong>cipal features of the Marxist dialectical method are as follows:<br />
“a) Contrary to metaphysics, dialectics does not regard nature as an<br />
accidental agglomeration of th<strong>in</strong>gs, of phenomena, unconnected with,<br />
isolated from, and <strong>in</strong>dependent of, each other, but as a connected and<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegral whole, <strong>in</strong> which th<strong>in</strong>gs, phenomena are organically connected<br />
with, dependent on, and determ<strong>in</strong>ed by, each other.<br />
The dialectical method therefore holds that no phenomenon <strong>in</strong> nature can<br />
be understood if taken by itself, isolated from surround<strong>in</strong>g phenomena,<br />
<strong>in</strong>asmuch as any phenomenon <strong>in</strong> any realm of nature may become<br />
mean<strong>in</strong>gless to us if it is not considered <strong>in</strong> connection with the<br />
surround<strong>in</strong>g conditions, but divorced from them; and that, vice versa,<br />
any phenomenon can be understood and expla<strong>in</strong>ed if considered <strong>in</strong> its<br />
<strong>in</strong>separable connection with surround<strong>in</strong>g phenomena, as one conditioned<br />
by surround<strong>in</strong>g phenomena.<br />
b) Contrary to metaphysics, dialectics holds that nature is not a state of<br />
rest and immobility, stagnation and immutability, but a state of<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>uous movement and change, of cont<strong>in</strong>uous renewal and<br />
development, where someth<strong>in</strong>g is always aris<strong>in</strong>g and develop<strong>in</strong>g, and<br />
someth<strong>in</strong>g always dis<strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g and dy<strong>in</strong>g away.