Hinduism: What Really Happenned in India (PDF) - Oration
Hinduism: What Really Happenned in India (PDF) - Oration
Hinduism: What Really Happenned in India (PDF) - Oration
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>H<strong>in</strong>duism</strong>: <strong>What</strong> <strong>Really</strong> Happened <strong>in</strong> <strong>India</strong> – M. M. N<strong>in</strong>an<br />
225<br />
themselves K<strong>in</strong>gs over them. As the K<strong>in</strong>gs and Priests wielded their<br />
power, Jesus came down strongly aga<strong>in</strong>st them and presented to them a<br />
God of love. They crucified him. The followers of Jesus even<br />
experimented with a sort of communal liv<strong>in</strong>g where "each accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
their ability and to each accord<strong>in</strong>g to their need" was the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple. It<br />
failed miserably because men and women were still An<strong>in</strong>ias and<br />
Saphiras. Hence the need for a redemption.<br />
Perception and Inference <strong>in</strong> Carvaka Philosophy<br />
The essence of epistemological approach is summarized by Purandara a<br />
follower of Carvaka (7th Century) thus.<br />
“The usefulness of <strong>in</strong>ference <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the nature of all worldly<br />
th<strong>in</strong>gs where perceptual experience is available is not questionable.<br />
However, such <strong>in</strong>ference cannot be employed for establish<strong>in</strong>g any dogma<br />
regard<strong>in</strong>g the transcendental world, or life after death or the laws of<br />
Karma for which ord<strong>in</strong>arily there is no perceptual experience. The ma<strong>in</strong><br />
reason for uphold<strong>in</strong>g such a dist<strong>in</strong>ction between the validity of <strong>in</strong>ference<br />
<strong>in</strong> our practical life of ord<strong>in</strong>ary experience, and <strong>in</strong> ascerta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
transcend<strong>in</strong>g truths beyond experience is this: Any conclusion based on<br />
Inductive generalization by observ<strong>in</strong>g a large number of cases of<br />
agreement together with total absence of disagreement is true.<br />
But <strong>in</strong> the case of transcendent sphere, such agreement cannot exist<br />
because; they cannot be perceived by the senses“ (Purandara <strong>in</strong><br />
Kamalasila's Panjika)<br />
In the Christian reason<strong>in</strong>g too, the above argument is sound. We cannot<br />
make arbitrary assumptions based on possible <strong>in</strong>ferences. This is<br />
especially true on matters that are of eternal consequence. How can we<br />
know the reality of God and his purposes. Can these be perceived by our<br />
senses? The historical verification of matters of faith had been very<br />
important to Judeo-Christian tradition. Prophets and seers were respected<br />
and accepted not because of their logic, of their declaration power, or<br />
because of signs and wonders they performed. They were accepted based<br />
on whether their declaration tallied with verifiable historical facts. There