Hinduism: What Really Happenned in India (PDF) - Oration
Hinduism: What Really Happenned in India (PDF) - Oration
Hinduism: What Really Happenned in India (PDF) - Oration
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>H<strong>in</strong>duism</strong>: <strong>What</strong> <strong>Really</strong> Happened <strong>in</strong> <strong>India</strong> – M. M. N<strong>in</strong>an<br />
100 AD at liberal estimate. They must have been written down much<br />
later <strong>in</strong> actual fact. A more realistic estimate will be around 6 th Centaury<br />
AD.<br />
Thus for <strong>in</strong>stance the vast amalgamation of Puranic tradition<br />
known as the Skandapurana, as far as we can speak of it as a s<strong>in</strong>gle work<br />
at all, cannot be older than the 16th century, as has been shown <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Gron<strong>in</strong>gen Skandapurana project (see Adriaensen et al 1994). Many<br />
scientific manuals and commentaries were composed dur<strong>in</strong>g the 17th and<br />
18th centuries, and a 19th century compilation, the Sukraniti, passed for<br />
a long time as a genu<strong>in</strong>e ancient work. And of course, <strong>India</strong>n scholars of<br />
traditional learn<strong>in</strong>g are all the time produc<strong>in</strong>g new Sanskrit literature.<br />
Klaus Karttunen http://folklore.ee/folklore/vol8/veda.htm<br />
It should be noted here that the names of the gods and the Rishis<br />
with which each Sukta beg<strong>in</strong>s were selected long after the collection of<br />
the VEDAS. These were determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the Index known as the<br />
Anukramanee. Katyayana composed the Anukramanee, which has been<br />
followed <strong>in</strong> the Rik-Sanhita <strong>in</strong> adopt<strong>in</strong>g the names of the gods and the<br />
rishis. Katyayana came after Yáska and it is therefore evident that the<br />
names were <strong>in</strong>vented many centuries afterwards without hav<strong>in</strong>g any<br />
historic truth <strong>in</strong> them. There is noth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the Suktas themselves, which<br />
can throw any light <strong>in</strong> elucidat<strong>in</strong>g these words. Rajeswar Gupta<br />
http://phoenicia.org/rigveda.html<br />
“The great epic called the Mahabaharatha (between 300 BC and<br />
AD 300) is by far the most important representative of the purana. Of<br />
somewhat similar free style are the 18 Puranas of a much later date. The<br />
beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>gs of the artistic style are seen <strong>in</strong> the Ramayana (begun 3rd<br />
century BC). The f<strong>in</strong>ished epic kavya form, however, was not evolved<br />
until the time of Kalidasa, about the 5th century AD. This poet and<br />
dramatist is the author of the two best-known Sanskrit artistic epics, the<br />
Kumarasambhava and the Raghuvamsa”. http://www.connect.net/ron/<br />
sanskritliterature.html<br />
80