05.04.2013 Views

U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC

U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC

U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

chapter 21 (miscellaneous food) have MFN tariffs ranging from 5 to 754 270 percent (mostly<br />

8 or 18 percent). These tariffs would be eliminated in 5 or 10 years under the FTA, and none<br />

is subject to TRQs or safeguards. 271 Consequently, the tariff eliminations of the FTA should<br />

improve the competitive position of the United States against China, the EU, and Japan once<br />

they are fully implemented. In addition, implementation of the FTA should support the U.S.<br />

processed food industry’s ability to continue to capture some of the growing demand in<br />

<strong>Korea</strong>.<br />

As shown in the Views of Interested Parties below, industry representatives have expressed<br />

concerns regarding the adverse effect of NTMs on U.S. exports to <strong>Korea</strong>. An analysis of<br />

international price and quantity data comparing <strong>Korea</strong>n imports to comparable countries<br />

indicates that the potential effect of NTMs on <strong>Korea</strong>n imports may be to restrict the quantity<br />

of imports or raise the price of imports for a variety of processed foods (box 3.2).<br />

Implementation of the TBT provisions of the FTA will likely be critical to fully realizing<br />

these gains in market access.<br />

Views of Interested Parties<br />

In its report on the agreement, the ATAC for <strong>Trade</strong> in Processed Foods stated that it supports<br />

the FTA. It noted that more than one-half of the current U.S. food and agriculture exports<br />

to <strong>Korea</strong> will become immediately free of duty, including a <strong>wide</strong> variety of processed<br />

products, while many others are subject to a relatively short 5-year tariff phaseout period.<br />

The report notes that U.S. exporters of many processed food products could see the benefits<br />

of tariff removal under the FTA negated by continued TBTs not addressed in the<br />

negotiations. Specifically, the report mentioned that <strong>Korea</strong> does not allow the use of several<br />

food additives that are approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and are<br />

commonly used in U.S. processed foods. Consequently, food products containing such<br />

additives would continue to be denied access to <strong>Korea</strong>, despite having their tariffs<br />

eliminated. 272<br />

A spokesperson for the Grocery Manufacturers Association and the Food Products<br />

Association (GMA-FPA), a trade association representing firms in the food, beverage, and<br />

consumer packaged goods industry, stated that the association is generally supportive of the<br />

FTA, as <strong>Korea</strong> is an important market for many of the producers it represents. 273 For tariffs,<br />

she noted that certain products of member companies will benefit greatly from <strong>Korea</strong>’s rapid<br />

duty elimination in such products as frozen french fries, grape juice, and orange juice, while<br />

other products such as tomato ketchup, peanut butter, popcorn, and dairy products will<br />

benefit relatively less because of duty eliminations lasting several years. Prior to the<br />

negotiations, she stated that the association noted several NTMs for processed foods as<br />

hindering. 274 The association added that it is pleased that the U.S. emphasized the importance<br />

270 Food preparations n.e.c. (red ginseng tea, HTS 2106.90.3021) has an MFN rate of 754 percent.<br />

271 USTR, “Final - United States - <strong>Korea</strong> FTA Texts,” 2007.<br />

272 ATAC for <strong>Trade</strong> in Processed Foods, Advisory Committee Report, April 27, 2007.<br />

273 Peggy S. Rochette, senior director of International Policy, GMA-FPA, interview by Commission staff,<br />

Washington, DC, June 27, 2007.<br />

274 Rochette, “Public Comments Regarding Proposed <strong>Free</strong> <strong>Trade</strong> <strong>Agreement</strong> with the Republic of <strong>Korea</strong>,”<br />

written submission to the <strong>Trade</strong> Policy Staff Committee, Office of the USTR, March 23, 2006.<br />

3-47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!