05.04.2013 Views

U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC

U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC

U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

government to take appropriate measures—such as the training of personnel, public<br />

education campaigns, and increased enforcement—to control infringement of books on or<br />

near school campuses. The third letter would confirm the commitment of the parties to shut<br />

down Internet sites that permit the unauthorized downloading and distribution of copyrighted<br />

works. <strong>Korea</strong> would further agree, within 6 months of entry in force of the <strong>Agreement</strong>, to<br />

issue a policy directive establishing clear jurisdiction for effective enforcement against<br />

online piracy. In the fourth side letter the parties would agree not to invoke the disputesettlement<br />

provisions of the FTA during the first 18 months after the FTA enters into force<br />

if a problem arises in the implementation of the patent linkage provision.<br />

Although the first side letter is similar to side letters contained in other FTAs, the other side<br />

letters are unique to the U.S.-<strong>Korea</strong> FTA. The side letter on copyright infringement near<br />

university campuses and the letter on online infringement would address particular IPR<br />

protection and enforcement challenges noted in the USTR’s Special 301 review of <strong>Korea</strong>.<br />

The fourth side letter was added to the FTA as a result of the Bipartisan <strong>Trade</strong> Deal.<br />

FTA Chapter 19—Labor<br />

As with the labor chapters of several previous FTAs, chapter 19 of the U.S.-<strong>Korea</strong> FTA<br />

would commit each party to effectively enforce its respective labor laws while providing for<br />

the reasonable exercise of discretion regarding such enforcement. In addition, the parties<br />

would reaffirm their obligations as members of the International Labour Organization (ILO).<br />

Much like the labor chapter of the U.S.-Panama TPA, however, chapter 19 of the U.S.-<strong>Korea</strong><br />

FTA would also commit the parties to maintain the rights specified in the ILO Declaration<br />

in their regulations and statutes. Further, whereas the labor provisions in many previous<br />

FTAs were subject to a separate dispute settlement mechanism, the provisions in chapter 19<br />

of the FTA would be subject to the same dispute settlement procedures as the agreement’s<br />

other obligations.<br />

Each party would agree to provide access to domestic tribunal proceedings, allowing persons<br />

with a recognized interest under its law in a particular matter to seek enforcement of its labor<br />

laws. Such proceedings must be fair, equitable, and transparent; adhere to due process of the<br />

law; and provide an opportunity for persons involved in such proceedings to support or<br />

defend their positions. Each party also would agree to ensure independent review of tribunal<br />

actions, provide legal remedies to ensure enforcement, and promote public awareness of its<br />

labor laws. The FTA defines labor laws as statutes or regulations at the central level of<br />

government that directly relate to internationally recognized labor rights, including the right<br />

of association, the right to organize and bargain collectively, a ban on forced or compulsory<br />

labor, the protection of children and other young laborers, and standards on conditions of<br />

work, including minimum wages, hours of work, and occupational health and safety.<br />

As with previous U.S. FTAs, the U.S.-<strong>Korea</strong> FTA would establish a Labor Affairs Council<br />

that would oversee the implementation of chapter 19 provisions. Each party would be<br />

required to designate an office within its labor ministry to serve as a contact with the other<br />

party and the public and to be responsible for, inter alia, the review of communications from<br />

persons of a party. A side letter clarifies that the parties would not be required to establish<br />

discrete procedures for the review of such communications if there are existing procedures<br />

for other communications relating to chapter 19, and that parties could consider whether a<br />

particular communication has merit, substantively resembles another communication, or is<br />

being addressed in another domestic or international forum. The FTA would allow each<br />

D-28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!