05.04.2013 Views

U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC

U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC

U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Brown expressed concern about the rules of origin in the agreement and said that as they<br />

have a local content threshold that provides “an incentive for auto parts makers from<br />

elsewhere in the region to circumvent their duties and access the U.S. market, duty-free,<br />

through the FTA. Senator Brown added that the FTA does not guarantee that the market<br />

access provisions will be stringently enforced. He noted the <strong>Korea</strong>n government’s estimate<br />

that <strong>Korea</strong>n auto exports will increase by $1 billion. He also noted the lack of increased<br />

market access arising from the 1995 and 1998 MOUs, and that he believes that “objective<br />

and verifiable benchmarks,” which were proposed by U.S. industry and labor, are a better<br />

way to achieve broader market access in <strong>Korea</strong>. 503<br />

Hyundai Motor Co. expressed support for the FTA in a submission to the Commission,<br />

stating that it believes “the benefits of vehicle tariff reduction under the KORUS FTA will<br />

be mutual and fair.” Hyundai stated that, as a result of tariff and nontariff provisions of the<br />

FTA, U.S. automakers should be able to improve their price competitiveness and market<br />

share in <strong>Korea</strong>. Hyundai reported that establishing manufacturing operations in major<br />

markets, including the United States, is part of its overall strategy to become one of the<br />

world’s leading automakers, in recognition of “the value of investing where we sell our<br />

vehicles.” Hyundai pointed out that it is engaged in the entire vehicle design, engineering,<br />

manufacturing, and testing process in the United States. Hyundai added that the FTA will<br />

create further opportunities for Hyundai to expand its market presence in the United States,<br />

to the benefit of the U.S. economy and the U.S. consumer. Hyundai noted that it will benefit<br />

from the U.S. duty savings negotiated in the FTA, stating that tariff and other provisions in<br />

the FTA will “allow Hyundai and its dealers to provide U.S. consumers with more choice,<br />

more competitive products and better service.” Hyundai noted, however, that many of the<br />

vehicles its sells in the United States are made locally. 504<br />

At the Commission’s hearing, <strong>Korea</strong>n Ambassador to the United States Lee Tae-sik stated<br />

that the U.S. automobile sector will benefit immensely from the U.S.-<strong>Korea</strong> FTA.<br />

Ambassador Lee said that the FTA ensures that U.S. automobiles would have a fair<br />

opportunity to compete in the <strong>Korea</strong>n market through the elimination of <strong>Korea</strong>’s 8 percent<br />

tariff on most U.S. cars, reforms to its taxation system, revisions to nontariff barriers such<br />

as emission and safety standards, and strengthening of dispute-settlement mechanisms,<br />

including the creation of snapback provisions. He addressed what he described as three<br />

misconceptions concerning the <strong>Korea</strong>n automobile sector.<br />

First, he said that the <strong>Korea</strong>n market is open to foreign automobiles. Although he noted<br />

imported vehicles (by number of vehicles sold in 2006) accounted for 4.5 percent of the<br />

<strong>Korea</strong>n market and are sold at relatively high prices, he said that the foreign-vehicle market<br />

share based on value rose to 14 percent in 2006. He also said that foreign-owned car<br />

manufacturers and imported cars together account for 30 percent of the total domestic market<br />

in <strong>Korea</strong>, compared to OECD member countries’ average rates of 40 percent. Second, he<br />

said that <strong>Korea</strong> is not the principal source of the U.S. automobile deficit, as it represented<br />

only $8.5 billion of the deficit and ranked fourth behind the EU’s $22.9 billion, Canada’s<br />

$25.1 billion, and Japan’s $43.2 billion in 2006. Third, Ambassador Lee stated that<br />

allegations that the <strong>Korea</strong>n government fosters a campaign discouraging purchases of foreign<br />

automobiles are “groundless.” He noted that <strong>Korea</strong>n automakers Kia and Hyundai have<br />

invested billions in high-tech manufacturing plants in Georgia and Alabama, respectively,<br />

503 Senator Brown, “Re: U.S.-<strong>Korea</strong> <strong>Free</strong> <strong>Trade</strong> <strong>Agreement</strong>: <strong>Potential</strong> <strong>Economy</strong>-<strong>wide</strong> and Selected<br />

Sectoral Effects,” written submission to the <strong>USITC</strong>, June 20, 2007.<br />

504 Shin, “Statement of Hyundai Motor Company on the U.S.-Republic of <strong>Korea</strong> <strong>Free</strong> <strong>Trade</strong> <strong>Agreement</strong>,”<br />

written submission to the <strong>USITC</strong>, June 27, 2007.<br />

3-90

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!