U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC
U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC
U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
and major supplier, and U.S. tariffs are high, such as man-made fibers, yarns, fabrics, and<br />
hosiery, and will likely displace domestic production of such goods and especially imports<br />
of such goods from other sources.<br />
The average U.S. tariff on imports from <strong>Korea</strong> is 11.0 percent for textiles and 16.5 percent<br />
for apparel, while the average <strong>Korea</strong>n tariff on imports from the United States is 8.3 percent<br />
for textiles and 12.4 percent for apparel. 290 The FTA would eliminate tariffs on textiles and<br />
apparel that meet the FTA rules of origin (“originating goods”) either immediately upon its<br />
implementation or within 10 years. 291 The FTA would eliminate U.S. tariffs immediately on<br />
52 percent of the <strong>Korea</strong>n goods (based on the level of U.S. imports of textiles and apparel<br />
from <strong>Korea</strong> in 2006) and phase out U.S. tariffs on the remainder over 5 years (21 percent of<br />
the total) or 10 years (27 percent). The FTA would remove <strong>Korea</strong>n tariffs immediately on<br />
77 percent of U.S. textile and apparel exports and phase out <strong>Korea</strong>n tariffs on the remainder<br />
over 3 years (13 percent) or 5 years (10 percent). 292<br />
The FTA would apply a yarn-forward rule of origin found in other recent U.S. FTAs to most<br />
textiles and apparel; 293 for a garment to qualify for FTA preferences, production of the yarn<br />
and fabric used in the garment, as well as cutting and sewing, must occur in the FTA<br />
region. 294 The FTA contains provisions similar to those found in CAFTA-DR. 295 Unlike<br />
CAFTA-DR, the U.S.-<strong>Korea</strong> FTA would permit the use of nonoriginating sewing thread,<br />
narrow fabrics, and pocketing fabrics in qualifying apparel, 296 and the U.S.-<strong>Korea</strong> FTA does<br />
not contain tariff preference levels (TPLs) that would grant tariff preferences to specified<br />
quantities of textiles and apparel made from nonoriginating materials or a “cumulation”<br />
290 The duties are based on trade in 2006.<br />
291 Data in the paragraph on the portion of trade that would be subject to immediate tariff elimination<br />
include goods subject to immediate tariff elimination (staging code “A”) and those already free of duty<br />
(staging code “K”).<br />
292 Data in the paragraph are in terms of goods covered by FTA chap. 4, which includes all textiles and<br />
apparel listed in the annex of the <strong>Agreement</strong> on Textiles and Clothing, which is contained in Annex 1A to the<br />
WTO <strong>Agreement</strong>. The products include, but are not limited to, textile and apparel articles in HS chapters<br />
50–63 except raw cotton, wool, and certain other textile fibers; textile travel goods (e.g., luggage) in HS<br />
heading 4202; glass fibers, yarns, and fabrics in HS heading 7019; and comforters in HS subheading<br />
9404.90. In 2006, U.S. imports from <strong>Korea</strong> totaled $2.0 billion and <strong>Korea</strong>n imports from the United States<br />
were an estimated $220–250 million. Official statistics of the U.S. Department of Commerce; and Global<br />
<strong>Trade</strong> Information Services, World <strong>Trade</strong> Atlas Database.<br />
293 FTA chap. 4 sets out the rules of origin and other provisions specifically applicable to textiles and<br />
apparel, a summary of which appears in app. D of this report.<br />
294 The yarn-forward rule of origin applies only to the component that determines the tariff classification<br />
of the garment (i.e., the component that gives the garment its “essential character”), rather than to all fabric<br />
components of the garment.<br />
295 The FTA would apply a more flexible single transformation, or “cut and sew,” rule of origin but to<br />
fewer goods, and would require certain visible linings used in qualifying suits, coats, jackets, and skirts to<br />
originate in the FTA region. The cut and sew rule would permit the use of nonoriginating fabrics in certain<br />
goods as long as the goods are cut and sewn in the FTA region, including textile luggage, silk and linen<br />
apparel, certain knit cotton pajamas and underwear, women’s knit man-made fiber blazers, and men’s woven<br />
shirts of fine-count cotton and man-made fiber fabrics.<br />
296 U.S. textile companies expressed concern that the FTA would permit the use of nonoriginating sewing<br />
thread, narrow fabrics, and pocketing fabrics in FTA-qualifying goods, because these inputs are in “plentiful<br />
supply” in the FTA region. ITAC (13) on Textiles and Clothing, Advisory Committee Report, April 27, 2007.<br />
According to the United States Association of Importers of Textiles and Apparel (USA-ITA), the key and<br />
most beneficial components of the textile and apparel provisions of the FTA include the use of these<br />
nonoriginating inputs. Jones, written submission to the <strong>USITC</strong>, June 27, 2007, 2–3.<br />
3-52