U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC
U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC
U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
would grant immediate and reciprocal duty-free market access for tariff lines covering all<br />
leather goods, except for 17 U.S. tariff lines covering “sensitive” rubber footwear from<br />
<strong>Korea</strong>. 339 U.S. tariffs on the sensitive footwear, which range from 20 percent to 64 percent<br />
AVE (based on 2006 trade), would receive a nonlinear phaseout over 12 years. 340<br />
The FTA rule of origin for the sensitive rubber footwear would, as in other U.S. FTAs, be<br />
similar to that under NAFTA, requiring a good to have a regional value content of not less<br />
than 55 percent of the appraised value of the article, which would effectively limit the use<br />
of nonoriginating uppers because of the high labor content associated with stitching. All<br />
other footwear would receive a more flexible rule of origin based on assembly also found<br />
in other recent U.S. FTAs, in which qualifying footwear could contain nonoriginating uppers<br />
and other materials as long as it is assembled in the FTA parties. A flexible process-based<br />
origin rule would apply to textile and nontextile travel goods, 341 requiring that the goods be<br />
cut or knit to shape, or both, and sewn or otherwise assembled in the FTA parties. 342 A trade<br />
report notes that more than 80 percent of all travel goods sold in the United States in 2006<br />
were textile travel goods. 343<br />
The Commission’s economy-<strong>wide</strong> analysis of the long-term effects of tariff and TRQ<br />
liberalization estimates that the FTA would likely result in an increase of $81–104 million<br />
(104–133 percent) for U.S. imports of leather goods from <strong>Korea</strong> and approximately<br />
$60–71 million (53–63 percent) for U.S. exports of leather goods to <strong>Korea</strong>. 344 The results<br />
largely reflect <strong>Korea</strong>’s small and greatly diminished share of U.S. imports of leather goods,<br />
as well as the high import share in key domestic markets for leather goods. 345 Once a major<br />
world exporter of leather goods, <strong>Korea</strong> supplied just 0.2 percent ($54 million) of total U.S.<br />
imports of leather goods in 2006. 346 U.S. imports of leather goods come mostly from China,<br />
which supplied 71 percent ($19 billion) of the total in 2006. Imports now supply 98 percent<br />
339 The 17 tariff lines (20 lines in the 2007 HTS) cover rubber or plastic protective footwear and certain<br />
athletic and other footwear with rubber or plastic soles and fabric uppers (HTS subheadings 6401.10.00,<br />
6401.91.00, 6401.92.90, 6401.99.30, 6401.99.60, 6401.99.90, 6402.30.50, 6402.30.70, 6402.30.80,<br />
6402.91.50, 6402.91.80, 6402.91.90, 6402.99.20, 6402.99.80, 6402.99.90, 6404.11.90, and 6404.19.20).<br />
340 The tariffs would remain unchanged during years one through eight, and then be reduced in four equal<br />
annual stages, becoming free at the beginning of year 12. U.S. imports from <strong>Korea</strong> of rubber footwear<br />
covered by the 17 U.S. rate lines fell by 98 percent from $145.8 million in 1996 to $2.8 million in 2006.<br />
Official statistics of the U.S. Department of Commerce.<br />
341 Textile travel goods are covered in FTA chap. 4, which contains the rules of origin and other<br />
provisions specifically applicable to textiles and apparel. A summary of these provisions appears in app. D of<br />
this report.<br />
342 Many recent U.S. FTAs apply a more restrictive “fabric-forward” rule of origin to textile travel goods,<br />
whereby imports of such goods from the FTA party must be made from inputs produced in the FTA region<br />
from the fabric stage forward to qualify for tariff preferences. For a textile travel good to qualify for FTA<br />
preferences under a fabric-forward rule, the production of the fabric used in the travel good, as well as<br />
cutting and sewing, must occur in the FTA parties. A representative of the U.S. travel goods industry<br />
contends that a fabric-forward rule “essentially renders the agreement useless for U.S. travel goods firms.”<br />
Pittenger, written submission to the Commission.<br />
343 Pittenger, written submission to the <strong>USITC</strong>, June 27, 2007.<br />
344 Impact relative to an estimated 2008 base. See chap. 2 of this report for additional information<br />
regarding the economy-<strong>wide</strong> analysis.<br />
345 U.S. imports of leather goods from the world in 2006 totaled $27.1 billion, of which $19.0 billion<br />
(70 percent of the total) consisted of footwear and $6.8 billion (25 percent) consisted of travel goods. Official<br />
statistics of the U.S. Department of Commerce.<br />
346 U.S. leather goods imports from <strong>Korea</strong> declined by 90 percent from $546 million in 1996 to<br />
$54 million in 2006.<br />
3-61