05.04.2013 Views

U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC

U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC

U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

would grant immediate and reciprocal duty-free market access for tariff lines covering all<br />

leather goods, except for 17 U.S. tariff lines covering “sensitive” rubber footwear from<br />

<strong>Korea</strong>. 339 U.S. tariffs on the sensitive footwear, which range from 20 percent to 64 percent<br />

AVE (based on 2006 trade), would receive a nonlinear phaseout over 12 years. 340<br />

The FTA rule of origin for the sensitive rubber footwear would, as in other U.S. FTAs, be<br />

similar to that under NAFTA, requiring a good to have a regional value content of not less<br />

than 55 percent of the appraised value of the article, which would effectively limit the use<br />

of nonoriginating uppers because of the high labor content associated with stitching. All<br />

other footwear would receive a more flexible rule of origin based on assembly also found<br />

in other recent U.S. FTAs, in which qualifying footwear could contain nonoriginating uppers<br />

and other materials as long as it is assembled in the FTA parties. A flexible process-based<br />

origin rule would apply to textile and nontextile travel goods, 341 requiring that the goods be<br />

cut or knit to shape, or both, and sewn or otherwise assembled in the FTA parties. 342 A trade<br />

report notes that more than 80 percent of all travel goods sold in the United States in 2006<br />

were textile travel goods. 343<br />

The Commission’s economy-<strong>wide</strong> analysis of the long-term effects of tariff and TRQ<br />

liberalization estimates that the FTA would likely result in an increase of $81–104 million<br />

(104–133 percent) for U.S. imports of leather goods from <strong>Korea</strong> and approximately<br />

$60–71 million (53–63 percent) for U.S. exports of leather goods to <strong>Korea</strong>. 344 The results<br />

largely reflect <strong>Korea</strong>’s small and greatly diminished share of U.S. imports of leather goods,<br />

as well as the high import share in key domestic markets for leather goods. 345 Once a major<br />

world exporter of leather goods, <strong>Korea</strong> supplied just 0.2 percent ($54 million) of total U.S.<br />

imports of leather goods in 2006. 346 U.S. imports of leather goods come mostly from China,<br />

which supplied 71 percent ($19 billion) of the total in 2006. Imports now supply 98 percent<br />

339 The 17 tariff lines (20 lines in the 2007 HTS) cover rubber or plastic protective footwear and certain<br />

athletic and other footwear with rubber or plastic soles and fabric uppers (HTS subheadings 6401.10.00,<br />

6401.91.00, 6401.92.90, 6401.99.30, 6401.99.60, 6401.99.90, 6402.30.50, 6402.30.70, 6402.30.80,<br />

6402.91.50, 6402.91.80, 6402.91.90, 6402.99.20, 6402.99.80, 6402.99.90, 6404.11.90, and 6404.19.20).<br />

340 The tariffs would remain unchanged during years one through eight, and then be reduced in four equal<br />

annual stages, becoming free at the beginning of year 12. U.S. imports from <strong>Korea</strong> of rubber footwear<br />

covered by the 17 U.S. rate lines fell by 98 percent from $145.8 million in 1996 to $2.8 million in 2006.<br />

Official statistics of the U.S. Department of Commerce.<br />

341 Textile travel goods are covered in FTA chap. 4, which contains the rules of origin and other<br />

provisions specifically applicable to textiles and apparel. A summary of these provisions appears in app. D of<br />

this report.<br />

342 Many recent U.S. FTAs apply a more restrictive “fabric-forward” rule of origin to textile travel goods,<br />

whereby imports of such goods from the FTA party must be made from inputs produced in the FTA region<br />

from the fabric stage forward to qualify for tariff preferences. For a textile travel good to qualify for FTA<br />

preferences under a fabric-forward rule, the production of the fabric used in the travel good, as well as<br />

cutting and sewing, must occur in the FTA parties. A representative of the U.S. travel goods industry<br />

contends that a fabric-forward rule “essentially renders the agreement useless for U.S. travel goods firms.”<br />

Pittenger, written submission to the Commission.<br />

343 Pittenger, written submission to the <strong>USITC</strong>, June 27, 2007.<br />

344 Impact relative to an estimated 2008 base. See chap. 2 of this report for additional information<br />

regarding the economy-<strong>wide</strong> analysis.<br />

345 U.S. imports of leather goods from the world in 2006 totaled $27.1 billion, of which $19.0 billion<br />

(70 percent of the total) consisted of footwear and $6.8 billion (25 percent) consisted of travel goods. Official<br />

statistics of the U.S. Department of Commerce.<br />

346 U.S. leather goods imports from <strong>Korea</strong> declined by 90 percent from $546 million in 1996 to<br />

$54 million in 2006.<br />

3-61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!