05.04.2013 Views

U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC

U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC

U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

oughly one-half from the Uruguay Round to the FTA. This decline in the TE represents<br />

both the lowering of barriers to entry and operation for U.S. firms in <strong>Korea</strong> as well as the<br />

lowering of the price of intermediation services (NIMs) facing <strong>Korea</strong>ns. 23 The drop in the<br />

TE from the GATS Uruguay Round commitments reflect decreased barriers to the<br />

acquisition of existing <strong>Korea</strong>n firms, reduced residency requirements for senior executives,<br />

and the elimination of minimum investment restrictions for FDI. Further reductions in the<br />

TE from the GATS Doha Round offers compared to the FTA reflect the reduction of<br />

restrictions in the cross-border supply of certain financial information services, the<br />

elimination of Mode 2 restrictions on the provision of a service in the country of the supplier<br />

to a consumer from another country, and the increased ability of foreign banks to offer a full<br />

range of financial products. The reduction of these barriers would decrease the costs of entry<br />

for U.S. banks wishing to establish a presence in <strong>Korea</strong> and enhance the operating<br />

environment for U.S. banks already located in the country. The lower NIMs that result from<br />

the increased level of liberalization under the FTA should promote more lending and<br />

economic growth in <strong>Korea</strong>, both of which should benefit U.S. banks in the country. Since<br />

the FTA is a bilateral as opposed to a multilateral agreement, the lower TE calculated for the<br />

FTA reflects a lower entry barrier for U.S.-based firms, but not necessarily for firms from<br />

other foreign countries. Banks from other countries would still face the higher TE when<br />

attempting to do business in <strong>Korea</strong>, unless they receive the same treatment as U.S. banks by<br />

making investments in <strong>Korea</strong> via U.S. affiliates. 24<br />

23 NIMs will vary across countries even for countries with identical TEs due to nontrade policy factors<br />

such as macroeconomic climate and country-level risk.<br />

24 If non-U.S. foreign banks are unable to enter the <strong>Korea</strong>n market via U.S. affiliates, the decline in NIMs<br />

may be smaller than otherwise.<br />

H-9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!