05.04.2013 Views

U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC

U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC

U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Key Assumptions<br />

Agency. 4 The price changes generated in the model in response to these production levels<br />

are in broad agreement with observed price changes. The nominal price of oil increased by<br />

120 percent over the period in question, while the price in the simulation rose from 2001–05<br />

by 118 percent.<br />

Gross output for select sectors is also targeted for the textiles and wearing apparel sectors<br />

in the United States. This adjustment is necessary because the two sectors experienced<br />

substantial contraction over the period, while in the absence of targeting the model<br />

anticipates only stagnation of growth.<br />

Once the database is updated to align with key observable 2005 data, the 2005 database is<br />

then projected forward to 2008. This is accomplished by incorporating real GDP and<br />

population growth projections from the sources listed above. Anticipated continued<br />

contraction in the textiles and wearing apparel sectors are also incorporated into the<br />

projection, as is removal of the remaining TRQs on wearing apparel imports from China,<br />

which are scheduled to expire in 2008. Certain key trade flows are also benchmarked to<br />

expected growth rates, including exports of vegetables, fruits, and nuts; and dairy products.<br />

The Commission’s simulation liberalizes trade completely in all goods subject to<br />

liberalization under the U.S.-<strong>Korea</strong> FTA, except for the vegetables, fruits, and nuts sector,<br />

which is subject to partial liberalization as a result of permanent, though increasing, TRQs.<br />

An additional policy change that is modeled is the reduction in the excise tax on the sale in<br />

<strong>Korea</strong> of all passenger vehicles with an engine displacement in excess of 2 liters. In order<br />

to reflect the effects of tariff elimination on U.S. beef exports, the 2008 U.S. export<br />

benchmark value assumes full resumption of U.S. beef exports to <strong>Korea</strong>, based on 2003 (pre-<br />

BSE) values, which are then projected forward to establish the 2008 baseline. To reflect the<br />

unchanging treatment for rice and rice products under the FTA and the limited trade<br />

expansion potential for products in the raw milk and sugar sectors, bilateral traded quantities<br />

are held level for products in the following model sectors: paddy and processed rice, raw<br />

milk, sugarcane and sugar beet, and manufactured sugar. In order to take into account the<br />

differential treatment of food-grade soybeans under the agreement, several changes to the<br />

standard liberalization scenario have been made. First, <strong>Korea</strong>n consumer demand is held<br />

constant in quantity terms to reflect the limits placed on U.S. exports of food-grade<br />

soybeans. Second, demand for oilseeds by food manufacturers in <strong>Korea</strong> (specifically, the<br />

sugar manufacturing, food products n.e.c., beverages and tobacco, and wholesale trade) are<br />

also held constant. There is no implicit or explicit time elapsing in the model, and no<br />

adjustment costs are considered. This assumption means, first, that all provisions of the FTA<br />

are assumed to be fully phased in immediately on January 1, 2008, rather than staged in over<br />

many years per the FTA. The assumption also means that the modeled results are long-run<br />

effects of a fully implemented FTA in an economy otherwise identical to the benchmark<br />

2008 economy—i.e., an economy with the same resources, population, and other<br />

characteristics as the 2008 economy.<br />

A full list of the initial measured trade barriers in the model is shown in table F.2. These<br />

barriers essentially constitute price gaps, or wedges, between world prices and domestic<br />

prices in the importing country. The differences are accounted for principally by tariffs and<br />

4 USDOE, EIA, “World Crude Oil Production,” May 25, 2007.<br />

F-6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!