U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC
U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC
U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Box 6.3 Labor market conditions in <strong>Korea</strong>—Continued<br />
At the same time, several sources reported a number of remaining problems with the observance of labor standards<br />
in <strong>Korea</strong>. <strong>Korea</strong> reportedly has placed limitations on workers’ ability to organize. For example, the implementation of<br />
legislation that would permit the establishment of more than one union at a single establishment has been delayed until<br />
2009, and employees in a broadly defined group of essential sectors are not permitted to strike. 11 Further, a<br />
representative of a U.S. workers’ union testified that efforts by <strong>Korea</strong>n auto workers’ to form unions and bargain<br />
collectively have faced significant obstacles and that more than 100 individuals are currently serving prison sentences<br />
in <strong>Korea</strong> due to their participation in labor union activities. 12 The large and growing share of temporary employees in<br />
the <strong>Korea</strong>n workforce is problematic, as such employees generally receive lower wages than regular workers and are<br />
ineligible for unemployment and health insurance. 13 Despite the recent introduction of the Employment Permit System<br />
for Migrant Workers (EPS), it has been reported that migrant workers continue to experience discrimination and the<br />
unfavorable effects of legislation that binds them to a certain employer. 14 Further, certain sources contend that the<br />
workers’ rights protections accorded to North <strong>Korea</strong>n employees in the Kaesong Industrial Complex—while superior<br />
to the measures applied elsewhere in North <strong>Korea</strong>—remain inadequate, and that such employees’ salaries are often<br />
paid to the government of North <strong>Korea</strong>. 15 Although goods produced by South <strong>Korea</strong>n firms in the Kaesong Industrial<br />
Complex would not benefit from the current provisions of the U.S.-<strong>Korea</strong> FTA, there are concerns that these provisions<br />
may change following further consultations between the United States and <strong>Korea</strong>. 16<br />
11 USDOS, “<strong>Korea</strong>, Republic of,” Country Reports of Human Rights Practices, March 6, 2007; and Kim, “The<br />
‘Second Opening’ of <strong>Korea</strong>: The U.S.-South <strong>Korea</strong> FTA,” Spring 2007.<br />
12 Meyer, testimony before the <strong>USITC</strong>, June 20, 2007, 221–222, 305.<br />
13 USDOS, “<strong>Korea</strong>, Republic of,” Country Reports of Human Rights Practices, March 6, 2007; and LAC for<br />
<strong>Trade</strong> Negotiations and <strong>Trade</strong> Policy, Report, April 27, 2007, 11-12.<br />
14 Agence France-Presse, “Amnesty urges South <strong>Korea</strong> to improve foreign workers’ rights,” April 30, 2007; and<br />
Read, “The Harsh Reality of Migrant Labor in South <strong>Korea</strong>,” May 19, 2007.<br />
15 CRS, “The Proposed South <strong>Korea</strong>-U.S. <strong>Free</strong> <strong>Trade</strong> <strong>Agreement</strong> (KORUS FTA),” April 23, 2007, 24; and<br />
Richardson, “Not a Sweatshop, but No Workers’ Heaven,” October 8, 2006.<br />
16 CRS, “The Proposed South <strong>Korea</strong>-U.S. <strong>Free</strong> <strong>Trade</strong> <strong>Agreement</strong> (KORUS FTA),” April 23, 2007, 7; and<br />
Brevetti, “Rep. Levin Expresses Concern with U.S.-<strong>Korea</strong> FTA’s Kaesong Provisions,” June 12, 2007.<br />
the labor provisions in many previous FTAs were subject to a separate dispute settlement<br />
mechanism, the provisions in chapter 19 of the FTA would be subject to the same dispute<br />
settlement procedures as the agreement’s other obligations.<br />
Each party would agree to provide access to domestic tribunal proceedings, allowing persons<br />
with a recognized interest under its law in a particular matter to seek enforcement of its labor<br />
laws. Such proceedings must be fair, equitable, and transparent; adhere to due process of the<br />
law; and provide an opportunity for persons involved in such proceedings to support or<br />
defend their positions. Each party also would agree to ensure independent review of tribunal<br />
actions, provide legal remedies to ensure enforcement, and promote public awareness of its<br />
labor laws. The FTA defines labor laws as statutes or regulations at the central level of<br />
government that directly relate to internationally recognized labor rights, including the right<br />
of association, the right to organize and bargain collectively, a ban on forced or compulsory<br />
labor, the protection of children and other young laborers, and standards on conditions of<br />
work, including minimum wages, hours of work, and occupational health and safety.<br />
As with previous U.S. FTAs, the U.S.-<strong>Korea</strong> FTA would establish a Labor Affairs Council<br />
that would oversee the implementation of chapter 19 provisions. Each party would be<br />
required to designate an office within its labor ministry to serve as a contact with the other<br />
6-32