05.04.2013 Views

U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC

U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC

U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 2<br />

Impact of Tariff- and Tariff-rate Quotarelated<br />

Provisions on the U.S. <strong>Economy</strong><br />

This chapter provides an estimate of the quantifiable impact of the fully-implemented<br />

U.S.-<strong>Korea</strong> FTA on the U.S. economy, exports, imports, and aggregate agriculture and<br />

manufacturing sectors. 1 To illustrate the likely impact of the U.S.-<strong>Korea</strong> FTA on the United<br />

States, an analysis was performed implementing the agreement’s tariff and tariff-rate quota<br />

(TRQ) reductions in a computational simulation of the U.S. economy. To assess the relative<br />

importance of those products subject to immediate liberalization under the FTA, a separate<br />

analysis was performed for those products that are liberalized fully and immediately upon<br />

implementation of the FTA.<br />

Analytical Framework<br />

The Commission’s analysis of the possible economy-<strong>wide</strong> effects of the removal of tariffs<br />

and TRQs under the FTA includes a number of measures of U.S. economic activity,<br />

including the possible impact on U.S. exports, imports, production, and employment. The<br />

lack of necessary data precludes the quantification of the impact of the FTA provisions<br />

relating to services, investment, labor, and environment. A qualitative assessment of the<br />

impact of these provisions is provided in chapters 4 to 6 of this report. The method chosen<br />

for the quantitative analysis is a computable general equilibrium (CGE) simulation. The<br />

specific CGE model used for this analysis is the Global <strong>Trade</strong> Analysis Project (GTAP)<br />

model, described more fully in appendix F. 2 The model includes domestic economic activity<br />

and trade patterns for the United States and <strong>Korea</strong>, as well as for multiple regions 3 of the<br />

world economy and for multiple products produced in those regional economies. The model<br />

describes production and trade in 54 aggregate industry sectors, including 40 merchandise<br />

sectors and 14 service sectors. 4<br />

The use of a CGE model permits the Commission to measure the possible incremental effect<br />

of the negotiated U.S.-<strong>Korea</strong> FTA tariff and quota reductions on exports and imports,<br />

aggregate economic sectors, and labor markets. The model estimates the effects of tariff- and<br />

TRQ-related provisions of the agreement on an economy that resembles the U.S. economy<br />

in 2008, when the agreement is anticipated to enter into effect. The standard GTAP model<br />

begins with data reflecting conditions in 2001; for the present analysis the standard model<br />

has been updated in two steps to reflect the 2008 economy. The model was first updated to<br />

reflect the state of the economy in 2005 (e.g., reflecting U.S. trade with major partners and<br />

1 The analysis in this chapter is primarily based on chapters 2–5 of the U.S.-<strong>Korea</strong> FTA.<br />

2 The model variant employed in this report is similar to that used by other researchers who also use the<br />

GTAP model to assess the impact of the U.S.-<strong>Korea</strong> FTA on the U.S. economy. There are important<br />

differences in simulation structure between studies, however. This report analyzes the negotiated FTA, in<br />

contrast to other studies, which analyze a proposed or hypothetical FTA. The baseline data used in the<br />

Commission’s model also more accurately reflect current data. See chap. 7 for a review of the literature.<br />

3 GTAP regions were aggregated to include, in addition to the United States and <strong>Korea</strong>, Canada, Chile,<br />

China, the EU, Japan, the Rest of Asia, Mexico, and the Rest of World.<br />

4 Chap. 3 provides an assessment of the effects at a more disaggregated level for selected sectors/products.<br />

2-1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!