U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC
U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC
U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Table 3.16 <strong>Korea</strong>n passenger vehicle market by engine size, 2005<br />
Engine category Domestic Import<br />
Percent No. of vehicles Percent No. of vehicles<br />
1,000 cc and under 5 45,678 0 0<br />
1,001 cc–1,600 cc 17 155,303 2 618<br />
1,601 cc–2,000 cc 54 493,317 21 6,489<br />
Over 2,000 cc 24 219,252 77 23,794<br />
Total 100 913,550 100 30,901<br />
Source: Commission staff calculations based on <strong>Korea</strong>n Automobile Manufacturers Association and Automotive<br />
<strong>Trade</strong> Policy Council, as reported in Ford Motor Company posthearing statement.<br />
Note: Data for engine categories 1,001–1,600 cc and 1,601–2,000 cc estimated by Automotive <strong>Trade</strong> Policy<br />
Council based on data for 1,001–1,500 cc and 1,501–2,000 cc.<br />
A broad spectrum of taxes are assessed on all passenger vehicles, imports and domestically<br />
produced vehicles alike, and are assessed in a cascading manner, beginning with the import<br />
tariff (in the case of imports). Purchase taxes are applied next, and include the special<br />
consumption tax based on engine size, the educational tax that is a percentage of the special<br />
excise tax, value-added tax (VAT), registration tax, acquisition tax, and the subway bond;<br />
the bond is also based on engine size. Ownership taxes include an annual vehicle tax that is<br />
based on engine size and an annual educational tax that is based on the annual vehicle tax.<br />
Aside from assessing certain taxes based on engine size—a disadvantage for U.S. exporters<br />
whose strength is in larger engine cars—the cascading method of application magnifies the<br />
effect for imports and for cars with larger engines. For example, a comparison of a <strong>Korea</strong>nbuilt<br />
and an imported vehicle, both with engines over 2,000 cc and a price of $30,000, 441<br />
results in a total tax amount paid by the purchaser/consumer for the imported vehicle that is<br />
20–25 percent higher than for the <strong>Korea</strong>n-built vehicle. 442<br />
The extent to which safety and environmental standards affect market access is harder to<br />
assess in a quantifiable way. U.S. industry sources report that <strong>Korea</strong>n standards “are unique<br />
to any other standards in the world,” 443 and characterize them as elaborately layered, everchanging,<br />
444 and “often nontransparent and out of sync with international standards.” 445<br />
Although these standards apply to all vehicles sold in the <strong>Korea</strong>n market, <strong>Korea</strong>n automakers<br />
are able to amortize the cost of meeting such standards over a much broader sales base. 446<br />
Moreover, standards are subject to revisions as new models are introduced. 447<br />
The effect of these NTMs may be to restrict the quantity of imports or raise the price of<br />
imports for passenger cars (box 3.3). According to Jeffrey Schott of the Peterson Institute<br />
for International Economics, “A large segment of the <strong>Korea</strong>n market is taken by small engine<br />
vehicles, not the mainstay of major US producers...[t]hat said, the low import penetration of<br />
441 Ex factory + insurance and freight.<br />
442 Import, purchase, and first-year ownership, less insurance, freight, and dealer markup. Based on<br />
calculations of the U.S. Department of Commerce.<br />
443 Biegun, testimony before the <strong>USITC</strong>, June 20, 2007, 240.<br />
444 Ibid.<br />
445 Ibid.<br />
446 Ibid., 210–11.<br />
447 Meyer, testimony before the <strong>USITC</strong>, June 20, 2007, 238.<br />
3-76