05.04.2013 Views

U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC

U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC

U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

other barriers. 5 As tabulated, they consist of tariffs and price premiums due to TRQs,<br />

measured in the GTAP database as AVEs. 6 The sectors listed in table F.2, and their<br />

corresponding import tariff equivalent measures, are highly aggregated. For example, the<br />

“other crops” category includes commodities such as coffee, tea, cut flowers, cotton, spices,<br />

and tobacco. As a result, the listed import tariff equivalent measures are trade-weighted<br />

averages of the measures faced by the individual commodities composing the aggregates.<br />

The tariff equivalents listed here include the effects of TRQs imposed on certain agricultural<br />

products. As shown in table F.2, the tariffs on <strong>Korea</strong>’s imports from the United States (i.e.,<br />

U.S. exports) are higher than the tariffs on U.S. imports from <strong>Korea</strong>. Services are restricted<br />

by nontariff barriers but these barriers are not measured in the GTAP data, precluding a<br />

quantitative assessment of the services sector liberalization under the FTA on these sectors.<br />

In addition, the Commission did not explicitly model the impact of rules of origin, but the<br />

simulation performed is consistent with the existence of such rules. In the simulation, it is<br />

assumed that traded commodities are differentiated by country of origin, which implies a<br />

limit to the substitutability of imports sourced from a third country.<br />

Solution Technique<br />

Full FTA Implementation<br />

The analysis employs a comparative static framework in which a benchmark equilibrium<br />

depiction of the U.S. economy, as of January 1, 2008, is derived through a set of balanced<br />

accounts of trade, production, consumption, and taxes. Once this benchmark has been<br />

created, policy shocks are imposed on the balanced model. A policy shock simply means a<br />

change in policy imposed on the model to measure its effect. In this analysis, the policy<br />

shocks consist of the reduction or elimination of tariffs and measurable TRQs agreed to in<br />

the FTA shown in table F.2.<br />

To estimate the marginal effect of the FTA, the trade policies (tariffs and TRQs) shown in<br />

table F.2 are replaced with new levels (generally zero) to represent the new, post-FTA<br />

economic state. The model is rebalanced, and new values for trade flows, outputs,<br />

employment, welfare, and GDP are generated. The difference between the benchmark values<br />

of these variables and their new values is the estimated marginal effect of the removal of<br />

tariffs and measurable TRQs under the FTA. It is expected that sectors facing relatively high<br />

trade barriers will show relatively larger effects as a result of the implementation of the FTA.<br />

5 A price gap summarizes the price impact of several border measures: ad valorem duties and specific<br />

duties that insulate domestic prices from short-term fluctuations in world markets. These price gaps are<br />

modeled as constant ad valorem gaps between domestic and world prices.<br />

6 Global <strong>Trade</strong>, Assistance, and Production: The GTAP 6 Data Base.<br />

F-7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!