05.04.2013 Views

U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC

U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC

U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Potential Economy-wide ... - USITC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

deterring illegal transshipments. It expressed concern, however, over whether Customs’<br />

management has the willingness and determination to properly enforce textile agreements.<br />

NCTO noted that, while the U.S. government did not allow goods from the industrial zones<br />

in Kaesong, North <strong>Korea</strong> to gain U.S. market access under the FTA, the agreement would<br />

allow for consultations with <strong>Korea</strong> on future access. NCTO noted that textile production is<br />

a major component of these industrial zones, where, according to <strong>Korea</strong>n projections, more<br />

than 300,000 people will work within 5 years of FTA passage. NCTO remarked that, even<br />

if these zones were never granted FTA status, the likelihood exists of significant<br />

transshipments from the zones to the United States.<br />

National Electrical Manufacturers Association 48<br />

Tthe National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) stated in a written submission<br />

to the Commission that it represents 430 companies that manufacture products used in<br />

generation, transmission, distribution, control, and use of electricity. NEMA stated that it<br />

supports the U.S.-<strong>Korea</strong> FTA and asks for legislators to ratify it as soon as possible. NEMA<br />

reported that <strong>Korea</strong> is one of the U.S. electrical equipment industry’s top ten export markets<br />

and that the United States currently runs a trade surplus with <strong>Korea</strong> in electrical equipment<br />

despite current <strong>Korea</strong>n tariffs in the 5–8 percent range. Despite concerns regarding nontariff<br />

barriers and intellectual property protection in <strong>Korea</strong>, they believe that the overall FTA<br />

would improve access to the <strong>Korea</strong> market, particularly the elimination (mostly immediate)<br />

of tariffs on products covered by their association’s scope. NEMA estimates that over<br />

$30 million of imports of U.S. products in <strong>Korea</strong> within their scope would be eliminated<br />

upon implementation of the <strong>Agreement</strong>.<br />

The National Pork Producers Council 49<br />

In written and hearing testimony, the National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) stated that<br />

it is a national association representing 44 affiliated state members that conducts public<br />

policy outreach to enhance opportunities for U.S. pork producers and other industry<br />

stakeholders. The NPPC reported that it works to pass and implement laws and regulations<br />

that are conducive to the production and sale of pork in both domestic and international<br />

markets, as well as to establish the U.S. pork industry as a consistent and responsible<br />

supplier of high-quality pork to the domestic and world market.<br />

The NPPC stated that it strongly supports the U.S.-<strong>Korea</strong> FTA. The NPPC noted that most<br />

tariffs on frozen pork are to be phased out by 2014, while those for chilled pork will be<br />

phased out in 10 years with a quantity-based safeguard that is acceptable. It added that the<br />

FTA is expected to add nearly $825 million dollars in additional pork exports and represents<br />

the most economically important FTA for the U.S. pork industry since NAFTA. It expects<br />

the FTA, when fully implemented, will cause live U.S. hog prices to be $10 higher than<br />

would otherwise have been the case and that <strong>Korea</strong> will absorb 5 percent of total U.S. pork<br />

production. The NPPC commented that <strong>Korea</strong> also provides an important market for many<br />

48 National Electrical Manufacturers Association, written submission, June 18, 2007.<br />

49 Brian Buhr, economist, University of Minnesota, on behalf of the National Pork Producers Council,<br />

testimony before the U.S. International <strong>Trade</strong> Commission, June 20, 2007; written submission,<br />

June 20, 2007; and posthearing submission, June 27, 2007.<br />

7-25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!