10.04.2013 Views

Geologic Studies in Alaska by the U.S. Geological Survey, 1992

Geologic Studies in Alaska by the U.S. Geological Survey, 1992

Geologic Studies in Alaska by the U.S. Geological Survey, 1992

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

168 GEOLOGIC STUDIES IN ALASKA BY THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY. <strong>1992</strong><br />

more easterly oceanic plate must have been succeeded <strong>by</strong><br />

subduction of a more westerly oceanic plate (fig. 3). This<br />

statement is deliberately vague because it is unclear<br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> Kula-Farallon ridge or a "West Kula-East<br />

Kula" ridge was subducted. The one ridge that can be<br />

elim<strong>in</strong>ated is <strong>the</strong> Kula-Pacific (compare Delong and oth-<br />

ers, 1978), because recently discovered magnetic anoma-<br />

lies <strong>in</strong>dicate that it ceased to spread at about 40-41 Ma,<br />

when it was thousands of kilometers offshore <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pa-<br />

cific, far from <strong>the</strong> North American or <strong>Alaska</strong>n marg<strong>in</strong><br />

where it could have been subducted (Lonsdale, 1988;<br />

Lonsdale's age picks have been modified accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong><br />

new magnetic time scale of Cande and Kent, <strong>1992</strong>).<br />

Simple plate circuitry among <strong>the</strong> North American, Pacific,<br />

Kula, and Farallon plates cannot fur<strong>the</strong>r resolve <strong>the</strong> iden-<br />

tity of <strong>the</strong> subducted ridge that we believe caused Sanak-<br />

Baranof magmatism, because so much ocean floor has<br />

been subducted s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> early Tertiary (Atwater, 1989).<br />

Various reconstructions do agree, however, on <strong>the</strong> approxi-<br />

mate offshore position of <strong>the</strong> Kula-Farailon-Pacific ridge-<br />

ridge-ridge triple junction at about 56 Ma (Engebretson<br />

and o<strong>the</strong>rs, 1985; Stock and Molnar, 1988; Lonsdale,<br />

1988; Atwater, 1989; Bol and o<strong>the</strong>rs, <strong>1992</strong>). These work-<br />

ers have <strong>in</strong>ferred that <strong>the</strong> Kula-Farallon ridge trended from<br />

this triple junction toward <strong>the</strong> present coastal position of<br />

Vancouver Island. However, it might have been offset to<br />

<strong>the</strong> north or south <strong>by</strong> transforms (Bol and o<strong>the</strong>rs,<br />

<strong>1992</strong>)(fig. 3). Ano<strong>the</strong>r possibility is that <strong>the</strong> Kula-Farallon<br />

ridge split <strong>in</strong>to ano<strong>the</strong>r ridge separat<strong>in</strong>g what could be<br />

called <strong>the</strong> "West Kula" and "East Kula" plates. Unfortu-<br />

nately, two postulated but poorly resolved onshore events<br />

complicate <strong>in</strong>terpretations even fur<strong>the</strong>r: (1) northward dis-<br />

placement of <strong>the</strong> Chugach-Pr<strong>in</strong>ce William terrane <strong>by</strong><br />

13*9", dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terval from about 57 to about 45 Ma<br />

(Coe and o<strong>the</strong>rs, 1985; Bol and o<strong>the</strong>rs, <strong>1992</strong>) and (2) for-<br />

mation of <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn <strong>Alaska</strong> orocl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>by</strong> 44k1 lo counter-<br />

clockwise rotation of southwestern <strong>Alaska</strong> some time<br />

between about 65 and about 35 Ma (Coe and o<strong>the</strong>rs,<br />

1989). If both events have been correctly <strong>in</strong>terpreted from<br />

<strong>the</strong> paleomagnetic record, all of <strong>the</strong> Sanak-Baranof belt<br />

was displaced northward relative to stable North America,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> part west of Pr<strong>in</strong>ce William Sound was orocl<strong>in</strong>ally<br />

rotated, possibly dur<strong>in</strong>g emplacement of <strong>the</strong> Sanak-<br />

Baranof plutons.<br />

Although a general west-to-east age progression is<br />

evident from figure 2, <strong>the</strong> available data do not allow reso-<br />

lution of a number of tectonically important details. The<br />

data do not even allow identification of <strong>the</strong> major plate<br />

Figure 3. Early Tertiary plate reconstruction of nor<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

Pacific, adapted from Bol and o<strong>the</strong>rs (<strong>1992</strong>) and Engebretson<br />

and o<strong>the</strong>rs (1985). Orocl<strong>in</strong>al bend has been straightened and<br />

Chugach-Pr<strong>in</strong>ce William terrane has been restored to a more<br />

sou<strong>the</strong>rly position, follow<strong>in</strong>g Bol and o<strong>the</strong>rs (<strong>1992</strong>). Solid<br />

ridge-transform system shows <strong>in</strong>ferred Kula-Farallon ridge<br />

configuration and position of triple junction at 57 Ma based on<br />

paleomagnetism (Bol and o<strong>the</strong>rs, <strong>1992</strong>). Relative positions of<br />

Kula-Farallon-North American triple junction at about 65 and<br />

about 50 Ma, based on <strong>the</strong> present study, are shown <strong>by</strong> numbers<br />

at ei<strong>the</strong>r end of <strong>the</strong> Chugach-Pr<strong>in</strong>ce William composite terrane<br />

<strong>in</strong> its restored position. Dashed ridge-transform systems are only<br />

two of an <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite number of possible alternative left-stepp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and right-stepp<strong>in</strong>g ridge geometries. Two alternatives shown<br />

would suggest more nor<strong>the</strong>rly or more sou<strong>the</strong>rly positions of<br />

Kula-Farallon-North American triple junction, respectively.<br />

Small transform offset could have caused major shift <strong>in</strong> position<br />

of triple junction. Formation of orocl<strong>in</strong>e may not have spanned<br />

entire 65- to 35-Ma age range permitted <strong>by</strong> paleomagnetic data.<br />

Complete lack of data on seafloor-spread<strong>in</strong>g history of nor<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

part of area shown as Kula plate allows for possibility that Kula<br />

plate was, <strong>in</strong> fact, two plates-"East Kula" and "West KulaW-<br />

separated <strong>by</strong> yet ano<strong>the</strong>r spread<strong>in</strong>g ridge that has been entirely<br />

subducted.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!