Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply - Embrapa

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Consulted Literature ABOU NOHRA, J.; BARRINGTON, S.; FRIGON, J. C.; GUIOT,, S. R. In storage psychrophilic anaerobic digestion of swine slurry. Resources Conservation and Recycling, Amsterdam, n. 38, p. 23-37. 2003. ABREU, P. G.; ABREU, V. M. N. Conforto térmico para aves. Concórdia: Embrapa Suínos e Aves, 2004. 5 p.(Embrapa Suínos e Aves. Comunicado Técnico, 365) AL SEADI, T.; MOLLER, H. B. Separation of slurry: a potential option for the animal production sector. In: EUROPEAN BIOGAS WORKSHOP, 2003, Esbjerg, Denmark. [Proceedings…]. Esbjerg, Denmark: University of Southern Denmark, 2003. ASSAD, E. D.; PINTO, H. S.; ZULLO, J. J.; ÁVILA, A. M. H. Impacto das mudanças climáticas no zoneamento agro-climático do café no Brasil. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, DF, v. 39, n.11, p.1057- 1064, nov. 2004. AXAOPOULOS, P. E.; PANAGAKIS, P. Energy end economic analysis of biogas heated livestock buildings. Biomass and Bioenergy, [Amsterdam] v. 24, n. 3, p. 239-248, 2003. AXAOPOULOS, P.; PANAGAKIS, P.; TSAVDARIS, A.; GEORGAKAKIS, D. Simulation and experimental performance of a solar-heated anaerobic digester. Solar Energy, Oxford, v. 70, n. 2, p. 155-164, 2001. BAÊTA, F. C.; SOUZA, C. F. Ambiência em edificações rurais: conforto animal. Viçosa: Editora da Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 1997. 246 p. BATZIAS, F. A.; SIDIRAS, D. K.; SPYROU, E. K. Evaluating livestock manures for biogas production: a GIS based method. Renewable Energy, Oxford, v. 30, n. 8, p.1161-1176 , 2005. BENINCASA, M.; ORTOLANI, A. F.; LUCAS JUNIOR, J. Biodigestores convencionais? 2. ed. Jaboticabal: Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinária, UNESP,1991. 25 p. BRASIL. Ministério de Minas e Energia. Balanço energético nacional. Available: . Oct, 21, 2004. CENTRO PARA A CONSERVAÇÃO DE ENERGIA. Guia técnico de biogás. Amadora, Portugal: Agência para a Energia, 2000. 117 p. CHAVES, R.; CAVALCANTI, I. Atmospheric circulation features associated with rainfall variability over southern northeast Brazil. Monthly Weather Review, Boston, v. 129, n. 10, p. 2614-2620. 2001. CHERNICHARO, C. A. L. Princípios do tratamento biológico de águas residuárias: biodigestores anaeróbios. Belo Horizonte: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Departamento de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental , 1997. v. 5. 246 p. CRUZ, V. M. F.; SOUSA, P. Analysis of methodologies estimation of animal heat and moisture production. In: CONGRESSO LATINO-AMERICANO Y DEL CARIBE DE INGENIERIA AGRARIA, Costa Rica, 2004. Anais… Costa Rica, 2004. CURTIS, S. E. Environmental management in animal agriculture. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1983. DAUBDOUB, M. Redução de emissões tóxicas. Available: . Jun, 13, 2005. DEMIRCI, G. G.; DEMIRER, G. N. Effect of initial COD concentration, nutrient addition, temperature and microbial acclimation on anaerobic treatability of broiler and cattle manure. Bioresource Technology, Oxford, n. 93, p.109-117, 2004. 111
DOHANYOS, M.; KOSOVA, B.; ZABRANSKA, J.; GRAU, P. Production and utilization of VFA’s in various types of anaerobic reactors. Water Sciences Technology, n. 17, p.191- 205, 1985 ENERGIAHP. Biodigestores e o biogás. Available: Feb, 6, 2003. FIALHO, E. T. Influência da temperatura sobre a utilização de proteína e energia em suínos em crescimento e terminação. In: SIMPÓSIO LATINO AMERICANO DE NUTRIÇÃO DE SUÍNOS,1994, São Paulo. Anais... São Paulo, CBNA, 1994. p. 63-83. GALESNE, A.; FENSTERSEIFER, J.; LAMB, R. Decisões de investimento da empresa. São Paulo: Atlas, 1999. HOOGWIJK, M.; DEN BROEK, R.; BERNDES, G.; FAAIJ, A. A review of assessments on the future of global contribution of biomass energy. In: WORLD CONFERENCE. ON BIOMASS ENERGY AND INDUSTRY, 1., 2000, Sevilla.[Proceedings…]London: James & James, 2001. KASHYAP, D. R.; DADHICH, K. S.; SHARMA, S. K. Biomethanation under psychrophilic conditions: a review. Bioresource Technology, Oxford, n. 87, p.147-153, 2003. KELLERHER, B. P.; LEAHY, J. J.; HENIHAN, A M.; O’DWYER, T. F.; SUTTON, D.; LEAHY, M. J. Advances in poultry litter disposal technology: a review. Bioresource Technology, Oxford, n. 83, p. 27-36, 2002. KUNZ, A.; HIGARASHI, M. M.; OLIVEIRA, P. A. V. de; MATTEI, R. M.; MIGUEL, W. C. Utilização de biodigestor abastecido com dejetos de suínos em uma pequena propriedade rural. In: SIMPÓSIO GAÚCHO DE EDUCAÇÃO AMBIENTAL,3., 2004, Erechim. [Anais...] Erechim: Universidade Regional Integrada, 2004. 1 CD-ROM. KUNZ, A.; PERDOMO, C. C.; OLIVEIRA, P. A. V. de. Biodigestores: avanços e retrocessos. Suinocultura Industrial, São Paulo, v. 26, n. 4, p.14-16, 2004. LA FARGE, B. de. Le biogaz: procédés de fermentation méthanique. Paris: Masson, 1995. 237 p. LAPP, H. M.; SCHULTE, D. D.; STEVENS, M. A. Biogas production from animal manure. Winnipeng, Manitoba: Biomass Energy Institute, 1978. 21 p. LE DIVIDICH, J.; NOBLET, J.; HERPIN, P.;VAN MILGEN, J.; QUINIOU, N. Thermoregulation. In: WISEMAN, J.; VARLEY, M. A; CHADWICK, J. P. (Ed.) Progress in pig science. Thrumpton, Nottingham: Nottingham University Press, 1998. p. 229 - 263. LUCAS JUNIOR, J. Estudo comparativo de biodigestores modelo indiano e chinês. 1987. 114f. Tese (Doutorado em Energia na Agricultura) - Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu. MACEDO, I. C. Estado da arte e tendências tecnológicas para energia. Brasília, DF: Centro de Gestão e Estudos Estratégicos, 2002. 90 p. Relatório. MAGBANUA JUNIOR, B. S.; ADAMS, T.T.; JOHNSTON, P. Anaerobic codigestion of hog and poultry waste. Bioresource Technology, Oxford, n. 76, p.165-168, 2001. MARTINEZ, J.; GUIZIOU, F.; PEU, P.; GUEUTIER, V. Influence of treatment techniques for pig slurry on methane emissions during subsequent storage. Biosystems Engineering, San Diego, v. 85, n. 3, p. 347- 354, 2003. MASSÉ D. I.; MASSE, L. The effect of temperature on slaughterhouse wastewater treatment in anaerobic sequencing batch reactors. Bioresource Technology, Oxford, n. 76, p. 91-98, 2001. MASSÉ, D. I.; MASSE, L.; CROTEAU, F. The effect of temperature fluctuations on psychrophilic anaerobic sequencing batch reactors treating swine manure. Bioresource Technology, Oxford, n. 89, p. 57-62, 2003. MÜLLER, H. B.; SOMMER, S. G.; AHRING, B. K. Methane productivity of manure, straw and solid fractions of manure. Biomass and Bioenergy, [Amsterdam], n. 26, p. 485-495, 2004. MURPHY, J. D.; MCKEOGH, E. The benefits of integrated treatment of wastes for the production of energy. Energy, Oxford, n. 31, p. 294-310, 2006. 112
Page 1 and 2:
Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock
Page 3 and 4:
Translated from the 2nd revised edi
Page 6:
Contents Executive Summary ........
Page 9 and 10:
the possibility of earmarking new l
Page 11 and 12:
systems and the quality of life. Th
Page 13 and 14:
solar radiation and plentiful manpo
Page 15 and 16:
Figure 2. Agroenergy production cha
Page 17 and 18:
a) Achieving sustainability of the
Page 19 and 20:
• Funding sources. The RD&I activ
Page 21 and 22:
Cross sectional actions There are d
Page 23 and 24:
• Developing technologies to add
Page 25 and 26:
of the systems and replacing fossil
Page 27 and 28:
• Improving the biodiesel quality
Page 29 and 30:
Biogas • Developing and evaluatin
Page 31 and 32:
Institutional Partnerships in Agroe
Page 33 and 34:
Creation of Embrapa Agroenergy The
Page 35 and 36:
International Biofuel Market Ethano
Page 37 and 38:
The purpose of these actions is to
Page 39 and 40:
Supplying lines of credit adequate
Page 42 and 43:
Annex 1 Current Energy Scenario and
Page 44 and 45:
Figure1. International price of the
Page 46 and 47:
Furthermore, the actual possibiliti
Page 48 and 49:
This scenario of increasing scarcit
Page 50 and 51:
produce approximately 4,500 EJ2 of
Page 52 and 53:
Figure. 4. Area of expansion of ene
Page 54 and 55:
The considerable variations in CO c
Page 56 and 57:
• The growing energy demand and t
Page 58 and 59:
Energy supply and demand scenarios
Page 60 and 61:
The most promising of all fossil so
Page 62: Table 9. Evolution of biomass costs
Page 65 and 66: Agroenergy Production Chains The ag
Page 67 and 68: Alcohol is used mixed with gasoline
Page 69 and 70: Consequently, alcohol fueled more t
Page 71 and 72: in the sugar & alcohol production c
Page 73 and 74: uncertainties still remain: the cor
Page 75 and 76: medium-size farmers by favoring sug
Page 77 and 78: possibility of increasing their ove
Page 79 and 80: in Brazil's share of the internatio
Page 81 and 82: it would be necessary to set up at
Page 83 and 84: those biodiesel plants has been app
Page 85 and 86: Table 11. Characteristics of oleagi
Page 87 and 88: until the 17th year, in a productiv
Page 89 and 90: Using agricultural zoning Embrapa h
Page 91 and 92: A useful reference is an Abiove stu
Page 93 and 94: Production and productivity indicat
Page 95 and 96: the charcoal for the steel industry
Page 97 and 98: The anaerobic digestion process (bi
Page 99 and 100: The average electric power consumpt
Page 101 and 102: sizable proportion of the residue i
Page 103 and 104: Figure 14. Atmospheric carbon dioxi
Page 105 and 106: carbon from a CDM project varies fr
Page 107 and 108: Emission Reduction), a differentiat
Page 109 and 110: • Direct substitution of fossil f
Page 111: SCHERER, E. E.; AITA, C.; BALDISSER
Page 115 and 116: ROBIN, P.; SOULOUMIAC, D.; OLIVEIRA
Page 117 and 118: Printing and finishing Embrapa Publ
show all

Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply - Embrapa

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?