Khawaja Zaheer Ahmed - PDMA
Khawaja Zaheer Ahmed - PDMA
Khawaja Zaheer Ahmed - PDMA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
practices, were as relevant, as was the fact that, with a critical but<br />
controversial change in design, the LMB had been armoured by<br />
‘stone-pitching’ under multi-billion rupee WB project executed in<br />
2004-06 and 2008-09, disregarding professional reservations about<br />
structural innovations thus enforced at a cost to public and the<br />
nation. Additionally, construction of a weir had also reportedly<br />
contributed to intensified pressure on the LMB, though overall flood<br />
flows were otherwise still much below the revised peak capacity of<br />
the renovated barrage. True that the breach had cascading effect<br />
on secondary Bunds that extensively devastated Kot Addu and<br />
Muzaffargarh but then many people did not believe that to happen,<br />
despite advance warnings by local officials. It is a pointer to the<br />
need to revisit the role of the WB team that designed and<br />
supervised Taunsa rehabilitation project during 2004-09. The<br />
Commission took note of the exhaustive evidence produced before<br />
the Punjab Judicial Commission that pointed out gross negligence<br />
in delayed filling of pond area, failure in timely activation of the<br />
gates of the Jinnah & Taunsa Barrages that may have relieved the<br />
pressure on the two LGB and LMB breached by the force of rising<br />
waters, before approaching dangerous levels, not to speak of<br />
accusations of attempted pilferage of tens of millions of rupees<br />
under the cover of bogus repair to flood damages by daring<br />
officials, identified during preliminary departmental inquiries, as well<br />
lower staff will need attention. It may not be advisable for this<br />
Commission to dilate further on the outcomes and consequences of<br />
the evidence led before the Punjab Commission in view of section 6<br />
of Ordinance II of 1969, but it has no hesitation in flagging that the<br />
World Bank must be sensitized to bear its part of the responsibility<br />
for what was done by its experts for which eventually residents of<br />
Kot Addu and Muzaffargarh were required to pay. It is also a lesson<br />
that professional credentials and advices by DFI experts must be<br />
Page 132 of 211