01.05.2013 Views

Khawaja Zaheer Ahmed - PDMA

Khawaja Zaheer Ahmed - PDMA

Khawaja Zaheer Ahmed - PDMA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

practices, were as relevant, as was the fact that, with a critical but<br />

controversial change in design, the LMB had been armoured by<br />

‘stone-pitching’ under multi-billion rupee WB project executed in<br />

2004-06 and 2008-09, disregarding professional reservations about<br />

structural innovations thus enforced at a cost to public and the<br />

nation. Additionally, construction of a weir had also reportedly<br />

contributed to intensified pressure on the LMB, though overall flood<br />

flows were otherwise still much below the revised peak capacity of<br />

the renovated barrage. True that the breach had cascading effect<br />

on secondary Bunds that extensively devastated Kot Addu and<br />

Muzaffargarh but then many people did not believe that to happen,<br />

despite advance warnings by local officials. It is a pointer to the<br />

need to revisit the role of the WB team that designed and<br />

supervised Taunsa rehabilitation project during 2004-09. The<br />

Commission took note of the exhaustive evidence produced before<br />

the Punjab Judicial Commission that pointed out gross negligence<br />

in delayed filling of pond area, failure in timely activation of the<br />

gates of the Jinnah & Taunsa Barrages that may have relieved the<br />

pressure on the two LGB and LMB breached by the force of rising<br />

waters, before approaching dangerous levels, not to speak of<br />

accusations of attempted pilferage of tens of millions of rupees<br />

under the cover of bogus repair to flood damages by daring<br />

officials, identified during preliminary departmental inquiries, as well<br />

lower staff will need attention. It may not be advisable for this<br />

Commission to dilate further on the outcomes and consequences of<br />

the evidence led before the Punjab Commission in view of section 6<br />

of Ordinance II of 1969, but it has no hesitation in flagging that the<br />

World Bank must be sensitized to bear its part of the responsibility<br />

for what was done by its experts for which eventually residents of<br />

Kot Addu and Muzaffargarh were required to pay. It is also a lesson<br />

that professional credentials and advices by DFI experts must be<br />

Page 132 of 211

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!