02.05.2013 Views

The Alchemy Key.pdf - Veritas File System

The Alchemy Key.pdf - Veritas File System

The Alchemy Key.pdf - Veritas File System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

are incomplete as regards the tally for Jerusalem, the total tribute is clear.<br />

After eliminating the tribute from identified cities, there is little remaining<br />

tribute to associate with Jerusalem. If there was a glorious wealth of gold<br />

shields and other tribute from Solomon’s city, Shoshenq I certainly did<br />

not triumphantly record it.<br />

Using accepted Biblical chronology the fifth year of Rehoboam<br />

would be about 917BCE, about five hundred and sixty years after<br />

Thutmose III's conquest. <strong>The</strong> Atbash Cipher solution decodes Shishak to<br />

Babel, meaning Babylon (see Appendix 10). 54 <strong>The</strong> Babylon connection<br />

means the fifth year of Rehoboam could well be another three hundred<br />

and twenty years later, in 597BCE. In this year King Nebuchadnezzar of<br />

Babylon invaded Israel, destroyed the Temple and carried the people into<br />

Exile.<br />

We therefore have a dazzling array of dates some eight hundred<br />

and eighty years apart, from the conquest of Tuthmose III to the time of<br />

King Nebuchadnezzar. <strong>The</strong>re must be another explanation.<br />

While retaining the identity of Shishak, we need to dispose of the<br />

derived Atbash Cipher solution as a date for the destruction of the<br />

Temple. <strong>The</strong>re were two traditional oppressors of the Israelites: Egypt<br />

and Babylon. <strong>The</strong> archetypal Egyptian King Shishak represented the<br />

kings of both lands. <strong>The</strong> biblical stories neatly combine the Israelites’<br />

two aggressors Shoshenq I and Nebuchadnezzar into a single archetype<br />

(later Rome was rolled in as well). <strong>The</strong> similarity of Pharaoh Shoshenq<br />

I’s name to Shishak is a fortuitous device that greatly enhances the power<br />

of the archetype because of its apparent internal consistency.<br />

King Shoshenq I’s Palestine campaign also conveniently aligns<br />

with the break-up of David’s empire. However, the lost empire was not<br />

Israel. It was the Delta of Egypt and all the lands in Tuthmose I’s<br />

kingdom that stretched to the Euphrates. <strong>The</strong> forlorn Israelites were<br />

anxious to regain their domain:<br />

And there shall come forth a rod out of the stem of Jesse, and a<br />

Branch shall grow out of his roots … And it shall come to pass in that<br />

day, that the Lord shall set his hand again the second time to recover the<br />

remnant of his people, which shall be left, from Assyria, and from Egypt,<br />

and from Pathros, and from Cush, and from Elam, and from Shinar, and<br />

from Hamath, and from the islands of the sea. 55<br />

For thus saith the Lord God of Israel unto me; Take the wine cup<br />

of this fury at my hand, and cause all the nations, to whom I send thee, to<br />

drink it. And they shall drink, and be moved, and be mad, because of the<br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!