The Alchemy Key.pdf - Veritas File System

Factor analysis of the data from Nei and Roychourdhury shows
that ninety six percent of the variance is explained by just three distinct
factors. From an inspection of the data, we can call them geographically
an Asian Factor, Caucasian Factor and African Factor. It is interesting to
note in the three-dimensional plot above just how distinctly separated the
African group is from the Asians and Caucasians.
The three factors directly relate to the main regional population
groups we noted earlier in the cluster analysis. The main factor, which
explains sixty five percent of the variance in the data, is the Asian Factor.
This factor is closely associated with the populations of Tibet, Mongolia,
South China and Thailand through to Polynesia and Papua. It correlates
inversely to the African Pygmies, Nigerians and Bantus.
The second factor is Caucasoid, with population groups that span
from North India and Iran through Germany and Italy to Finland and
England. The third factor turns out to be composed solely of the African
population groups, the Pygmies, Nigerians and Bantus. The North and
South Amerindians show a strong inverse correlation to the Africans,
which may imply a closer relation to Caucasians and Asians than to
Africans.
Comparison with a Chimpanzee only highlights the major
differences between groups further. The clear genetic distinctions
between the three geographical population groups bring us to the main
opposing hypothesis to the out-of-Africa theory.
This second hypothesis is the multiregional theory. It is a linear
theory for pluralists. The theory suggests that over the last one million
years Homo Sapiens evolved from Homo Erectus more or less
simultaneously in Europe, East Asia, Australia and Africa. 138 There were
many migrations into and out of Africa. While this theory has greater
consistency with our modern understanding of the linguistic roots of
population groups, it leaves many traditional genetic evolutionists quite
incredulous.
The main elements of DNA and linguistics analysis necessitate a
new bridging theory of population crucibles. The elements of this theory
have been in existence since George Todaro and his team at the US
National Cancer Institute began investigating Type C virus antibodies
twenty years ago. Nowadays, evidence is rapidly accumulating to support
his surprising conclusions.
49