Thesis

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Cases Reliability Scale: ALPHA Case Processing Summary N % Valid 186 99,5 Excluded( 1 ,5 a) Total 187 100,0 a Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items ,798 5 RELIABILITY /VARIABLES=pici5r pici21 pici37r pici53r pici69r /FORMAT=NOLABELS /SCALE(ALPHA)=ALL/MODEL=ALPHA. Cases Reliability Scale: ALPHA Case Processing Summary N % Valid 187 100,0 Excluded( 0 ,0 a) Total 187 100,0 a Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items ,574 5 RELIABILITY /VARIABLES=pici6r pici22 pici38 pici54 pici70 /FORMAT=NOLABELS /SCALE(ALPHA)=ALL/MODEL=ALPHA. Reliability Scale: ALPHA Case Processing Summary N % Cases Valid 187 100,0 Excluded( a) 0 ,0 Total 187 100,0 a Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items ,746 5
RELIABILITY /VARIABLES=pici7 pici23 pici39 pici55 pici71 /FORMAT=NOLABELS /SCALE(ALPHA)=ALL/MODEL=ALPHA. Cases Reliability Scale: ALPHA Case Processing Summary N % Valid 186 99,5 Excluded( a) 1 ,5 Total 187 100,0 a Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items ,780 5 RELIABILITY /VARIABLES=pici8 pici24 pici40 pici56 pici72 /FORMAT=NOLABELS /SCALE(ALPHA)=ALL/MODEL=ALPHA. Cases Reliability Scale: ALPHA Case Processing Summary N % Valid 186 99,5 Excluded( a) 1 ,5 Total 187 100,0 a Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items ,796 5 RELIABILITY /VARIABLES=pici9r pici25 pici41 pici57 pici73 /FORMAT=NOLABELS /SCALE(ALPHA)=ALL/MODEL=ALPHA. Cases Reliability Scale: ALPHA Case Processing Summary N % Valid 187 100,0 Excluded( a) 0 ,0 Total 187 100,0 a Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability Statistics
Page 1 and 2:
University of Eötvös Lorand Hunga
Page 3 and 4:
DEDICATION TO MY PARENTS; YOUR HARD
Page 5 and 6:
ABSTRACT A great deal of research h
Page 7 and 8:
3. METHOD……………………
Page 9 and 10:
1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. PURPOSE OF THE
Page 11 and 12:
1981). This questionnaire was and i
Page 13 and 14:
oncology wards (Sherman, 2004). Esc
Page 15 and 16:
(SWB). The meaning of SWB is how pe
Page 17 and 18:
extent demographic variables, work-
Page 19 and 20:
2. LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1. THE THEOR
Page 21 and 22:
different countries in Europe and t
Page 23 and 24:
Foxall, Zimmerman, Standley & Benee
Page 25 and 26:
nurse were both negatively connecte
Page 27 and 28:
elated to stress levels and job sat
Page 29 and 30:
Altun (2002) has pointed out that b
Page 31 and 32:
Demerouti et al. (2005) is also arg
Page 33 and 34:
Halbesleben & Buckley (2004) argued
Page 35 and 36:
Brewer & Shapard (2004) conducted a
Page 37 and 38:
the third dimension of the burnout
Page 39 and 40:
Table 1. Amount of nurses being bur
Page 41 and 42:
environmental variables at the hosp
Page 43 and 44:
and stress levels could be differen
Page 45 and 46:
about a patient’s treatment witho
Page 47 and 48:
Potter (2006) conducted a literatur
Page 49 and 50:
Lin, Hsu, Chao, Luh, Hung et al. (2
Page 51 and 52:
at work are underprivileged in comp
Page 53 and 54:
instructions from their supervisors
Page 55 and 56:
number of years worked as a nurse w
Page 57 and 58:
psychosomatic health, after demogra
Page 59 and 60:
environment, and support from the s
Page 61 and 62:
urnout. The factor which has been h
Page 63 and 64:
Diener & Tov (2005, in Kitayama & C
Page 65 and 66:
form of for example life satisfacti
Page 67 and 68:
develop burnout (see for example La
Page 69 and 70:
Simoni & Paterson (1997) have also
Page 71 and 72:
the psychological immune system (Ol
Page 73 and 74:
positive effect of social support i
Page 75 and 76:
Several authors have shown the effe
Page 77 and 78:
support especially important in rel
Page 79 and 80:
(1999), Tummers et al. (2002), and
Page 81 and 82:
According to Maslach (1982), when i
Page 83 and 84:
2.11. HOW CAN WE PREVENT BURNOUT? 2
Page 85 and 86:
work-related safety in order to dec
Page 87 and 88:
in the organization are not easy to
Page 89 and 90:
at work, and on the nurses’ work-
Page 91 and 92:
3. METHOD 3.1 STUDY POPULATION The
Page 93 and 94:
the head nurse at the second meetin
Page 95 and 96:
• Satisfaction with Life scale (D
Page 97 and 98:
assess people’s satisfaction with
Page 99 and 100:
positive accomplishment in the nurs
Page 101 and 102:
Goal Orientation 0.63 0.52 Impulse
Page 103 and 104:
23,71% Number of children 0-1 2-3 4
Page 105 and 106:
It was shown that the Swedish nurse
Page 107 and 108:
APPENDIX 3); a robust Welch-test fo
Page 109 and 110:
Table 8: ANOVA results of work stre
Page 111 and 112:
In the second part of the second hy
Page 113 and 114:
would be found in the Swedish sampl
Page 115 and 116:
The Monitoring-Creating-Executing S
Page 117 and 118:
4.6.3. Findings for Burnout and Per
Page 119 and 120:
Table 17: Robust Test of Equality o
Page 121 and 122:
Approach-Belief System (r=0.260, p
Page 123 and 124:
p
Page 125 and 126:
Approach-Belief System (1.01) and t
Page 127 and 128:
Marital status Table 23: Burnout me
Page 129 and 130:
generalized to other hospitals in S
Page 131 and 132:
feeling inexperienced would result
Page 133 and 134:
sample. Another researcher who foun
Page 135 and 136:
5.3. BURNOUT AND LIFE SATISFACTION
Page 137 and 138:
the findings in connection to life
Page 139 and 140:
salaries of health care system pers
Page 141 and 142:
urnout simply shows that the area o
Page 143 and 144:
feel supported at home and feel the
Page 145 and 146:
and that lower personality scores g
Page 147 and 148:
connection between age and burnout.
Page 149 and 150:
connection to them was not thought
Page 151 and 152:
and young nurses working in the int
Page 153 and 154: extensively researched all around t
Page 155 and 156: what if the Hungarian nurses would
Page 157 and 158: immunity between different countrie
Page 159 and 160: care workers (usually nurses). In s
Page 161 and 162: more efficient if they would be dir
Page 163 and 164: Aries, M. & Ritter, I. Z. (1999). N
Page 165 and 166: Brooks I. & Swailes S. (2002). Anal
Page 167 and 168: Chang, E. M., Bidewell, J. W., Hunt
Page 169 and 170: Cronin-Stubbs, D. & Rooks, C. A. (1
Page 171 and 172: Diener, E., Suh, E., Lucas, R. E. &
Page 173 and 174: Ghorpade, J., Lackritz, J. & Singh,
Page 175 and 176: Hupcey, J. E. (1998). Clarifying th
Page 177 and 178: Lakin, B., Leon, S. C. & Miller, S.
Page 179 and 180: Leiter, M. P. (1993). In Halbeslebe
Page 181 and 182: Maslach, C. (1982). Burnout: a soci
Page 183 and 184: Murrells, T., Robinson, S. & Griffi
Page 185 and 186: Piko, B. F. (1999). Work-related st
Page 187 and 188: Sherman, D. W. (2004). Nurses’ St
Page 189 and 190: Taris, T. W., Schreurs, P. J. G. &
Page 191 and 192: Wright, T. A. & Cropanzano, R. (199
Page 193 and 194: a. Age…………..years old b. Wh
Page 195 and 196: 6.I do not particularly like differ
Page 197 and 198: 4) I am interested in how you feel
Page 199 and 200: APPENDIX C ORIGINAL SPSS OUTPUTS Se
Page 201 and 202: Cases Reliability Scale: ALPHA Case
Page 203: Cases Case Processing Summary N % V
Page 207 and 208: Cases Case Processing Summary N % V
Page 209 and 210: Reliability Statistics Cronbach's A
Page 211 and 212: Section 6: Correlations of the test
Page 213 and 214: Emotional exhaustion_ mbi Depersona
Page 215 and 216: Table 11: Robust Tests of Equality
Page 217 and 218: ience d Worklo ad Stress related to
Page 219 and 220: Table 17: Coefficients(a) Unstandar
Page 221 and 222: Table 23: Excluded Variables(b) Par
Page 223 and 224: Table 30: Test of Homogeneity of Va
Page 225 and 226: a Predictors in the Model: (Constan
Page 227 and 228: 5 6 country 4,870 ,772 ,342 6,305 ,
Page 229 and 230: Social support questionnaire ,145(b
Page 231 and 232: Being unprepaired and feeling inexp
Page 233 and 234: Social mobilizing capac. subscale_P
Page 235 and 236: Section 16: Correlations of the PIC
Page 237 and 238: Table 48: Correlations: (Group numb
Page 239 and 240: Positive thinking subscale_PIC I Se
Page 241 and 242: Positive thinking subscale_PICI Sen
Page 243 and 244: Approach-Belief System Monitoring-C
Page 245 and 246: Approach-Belief System Monitoring-
Page 247 and 248: Model 1 Variables Entered Work stre
Page 249 and 250: Change and Challenge orient. subsca
Page 251 and 252: Married -,160(c) -2,798 ,006 -,208
Page 253 and 254: Relationship with the patient’s r
Page 255 and 256:
More than 5 years worked as a nurse
Page 257 and 258:
Work and private life ,006(b) ,079
Page 259 and 260:
Social creation capac. subscale_PIC
Page 261 and 262:
6 7 Residual 6334,172 172 36,827 To
Page 263 and 264:
Self-Efficacy subscale_PICI ,109(a)
Page 265 and 266:
Significant other subscale_ social
Page 267 and 268:
Stress related to tasks -,109(d) -1
Page 269 and 270:
7 Age Relationship with patients Wo
Page 271 and 272:
Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label Burnout
Page 273 and 274:
country ss ws ls PIC Burnout PIC ,0
Page 275 and 276:
Table 106: ECVI Model ECVI LO 90 HI
Page 277 and 278:
coun try 2,41 8 dp -,723 ss ls PICI
Page 279 and 280:
Table 120: tandardized Indirect Eff
Page 281 and 282:
ment_mbi Emotional exhaustion_mbi D
Page 283 and 284:
Personal accomplishment _mbi single
Page 285 and 286:
2 Model 1 2 Married . a Dependent V
Page 287 and 288:
Number of years at the current work
Page 289 and 290:
edu Total How many years have you w
Page 291 and 292:
Table 160: Chi-Square Tests Value d
Page 293 and 294:
Death, dying Conflic ts with doctor
Page 295 and 296:
Death, dying Conflic ts with doctor
Page 297 and 298:
** Correlation is significant at th
Page 299 and 300:
Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label e12 2,40
Page 301 and 302:
APPMONSYS CREEXSYS SELFREGSYS Goal
Page 303 and 304:
Table 184: RMSEA Model RMSEA LO 90
Page 305 and 306:
Table 192: Correlations: (Group num
Page 307 and 308:
APPMONSYS CREEXSYS SELFREGSYS Self-
Page 309:
Table 204: NCP Model NCP LO 90 HI 9
show all

Thesis

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?