f Predictors: (Constant), Sense of coherence subscale_PICI, Family subscale_ social support questionnaire, country, Depersonalization_mbi, Emotional exhaustion_mbi, Friends subscale_ social support questionnaire Table 40: ANOVA(g) Model 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Regression 3008,075 1 3008,075 88,346 ,000(a) Residual 5992,605 176 34,049 Total 9000,680 177 Regression 4045,582 2 2022,791 71,439 ,000(b) Residual 4955,098 175 28,315 Total 9000,680 177 Regression 4843,034 3 1614,345 67,561 ,000(c) Residual 4157,645 174 23,895 Total 9000,680 177 Regression 4986,756 4 1246,689 53,732 ,000(d) Residual 4013,924 173 23,202 Total 9000,680 177 Regression 5111,160 5 1022,232 45,205 ,000(e) Residual 3889,520 172 22,613 Total 9000,680 177 Regression 5225,197 6 870,866 39,443 ,000(f) Residual 3775,483 171 22,079 Total 9000,680 177 a Predictors: (Constant), Sense of coherence subscale_PICI b Predictors: (Constant), Sense of coherence subscale_PICI, Family subscale_ social support questionnaire c Predictors: (Constant), Sense of coherence subscale_PICI, Family subscale_ social support questionnaire, country d Predictors: (Constant), Sense of coherence subscale_PICI, Family subscale_ social support questionnaire, country, Depersonalization_mbi e Predictors: (Constant), Sense of coherence subscale_PICI, Family subscale_ social support questionnaire, country, Depersonalization_mbi, Emotional exhaustion_mbi f Predictors: (Constant), Sense of coherence subscale_PICI, Family subscale_ social support questionnaire, country, Depersonalization_mbi, Emotional exhaustion_mbi, Friends subscale_ social support questionnaire g Dependent Variable: ls Table 41: Coefficients(a) Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig. Model B Std. Error Beta B Std. Error 1 2 3 4 (Constant) -,155 2,460 -,063 ,950 Sense of coherence subscale_PICI 1,455 ,155 ,578 9,399 ,000 (Constant) -8,019 2,593 -3,093 ,002 Sense of coherence subscale_PICI 1,105 ,153 ,439 7,242 ,000 Family subscale_ social support questionnaire 2,202 ,364 ,367 6,053 ,000 (Constant) -11,371 2,451 -4,639 ,000 Sense of coherence subscale_PICI ,917 ,144 ,364 6,377 ,000 Family subscale_ social support questionnaire 2,176 ,334 ,363 6,511 ,000 country 4,377 ,758 ,307 5,777 ,000 (Constant) Sense of coherence subscale_PICI Family subscale_ social support questionnaire -14,648 2,751 -5,325 ,000 1,006 ,146 ,400 6,884 ,000 2,196 ,329 ,366 6,664 ,000
5 6 country 4,870 ,772 ,342 6,305 ,000 Depersonalization_mbi ,206 ,083 ,138 2,489 ,014 (Constant) -11,271 3,074 -3,667 ,000 Sense of coherence subscale_PICI ,945 ,147 ,375 6,439 ,000 Family subscale_ social support questionnaire 2,160 ,326 ,360 6,635 ,000 Country 4,301 ,800 ,302 5,375 ,000 Depersonalization_mbi ,343 ,100 ,230 3,413 ,001 Emotional exhaustion_mbi -,117 ,050 -,170 -2,345 ,020 (Constant) -13,616 3,208 -4,245 ,000 Sense of coherence subscale_PICI ,891 ,147 ,354 6,067 ,000 Family subscale_ social support questionnaire 1,786 ,361 ,298 4,941 ,000 country 4,397 ,792 ,309 5,553 ,000 Depersonalization_mbi ,346 ,099 ,232 3,488 ,001 Emotional exhaustion_mbi -,112 ,049 -,163 -2,273 ,024 Friends subscale_ social support questionnaire a Dependent Variable: ls ,885 ,389 ,135 2,273 ,024 Table 42: Excluded Variables(g) Partial Collinearity Model Beta In t Sig. Correlation Statistics 1 age ,121(a) 1,984 ,049 ,148 ,997 Number of years at the current workplace ,180(a) 2,997 ,003 ,221 ,999 Years spent in education ,193(a) 3,097 ,002 ,228 ,927 Partner ,140(a) 2,271 ,024 ,169 ,973 More than 1 child -,012(a) -,195 ,846 -,015 ,997 Works at least 40 hours -,124(a) -2,009 ,046 -,150 ,978 More than 5 years worked as a nurse -,109(a) -1,783 ,076 -,134 1,000 Married ,135(a) 2,212 ,028 ,165 ,991 country ,312(a) 5,275 ,000 ,370 ,939 Family subscale_ social support questionnaire ,367(a) 6,053 ,000 ,416 ,856 Friends subscale_ social support questionnaire ,262(a) 4,184 ,000 ,302 ,880 Significant other subscale_ social support questionnaire Social support questionnaire ,256(a) 4,044 ,000 ,292 ,869 ,362(a) 5,814 ,000 ,402 ,822 Positive thinking subscale_PICI ,248(a) 3,448 ,001 ,252 ,689 Sense of control subscale_PICI ,012(a) ,187 ,852 ,014 ,941 Creative Self-Concept subscale_PICI ,182(a) 2,506 ,013 ,186 ,698 Sense of Self-Growth subscale_PICI ,140(a) 1,643 ,102 ,123 ,518 Change and Challenge orient. subscale_PICI ,129(a) 1,963 ,051 ,147 ,863
- Page 1 and 2:
University of Eötvös Lorand Hunga
- Page 3 and 4:
DEDICATION TO MY PARENTS; YOUR HARD
- Page 5 and 6:
ABSTRACT A great deal of research h
- Page 7 and 8:
3. METHOD……………………
- Page 9 and 10:
1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. PURPOSE OF THE
- Page 11 and 12:
1981). This questionnaire was and i
- Page 13 and 14:
oncology wards (Sherman, 2004). Esc
- Page 15 and 16:
(SWB). The meaning of SWB is how pe
- Page 17 and 18:
extent demographic variables, work-
- Page 19 and 20:
2. LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1. THE THEOR
- Page 21 and 22:
different countries in Europe and t
- Page 23 and 24:
Foxall, Zimmerman, Standley & Benee
- Page 25 and 26:
nurse were both negatively connecte
- Page 27 and 28:
elated to stress levels and job sat
- Page 29 and 30:
Altun (2002) has pointed out that b
- Page 31 and 32:
Demerouti et al. (2005) is also arg
- Page 33 and 34:
Halbesleben & Buckley (2004) argued
- Page 35 and 36:
Brewer & Shapard (2004) conducted a
- Page 37 and 38:
the third dimension of the burnout
- Page 39 and 40:
Table 1. Amount of nurses being bur
- Page 41 and 42:
environmental variables at the hosp
- Page 43 and 44:
and stress levels could be differen
- Page 45 and 46:
about a patient’s treatment witho
- Page 47 and 48:
Potter (2006) conducted a literatur
- Page 49 and 50:
Lin, Hsu, Chao, Luh, Hung et al. (2
- Page 51 and 52:
at work are underprivileged in comp
- Page 53 and 54:
instructions from their supervisors
- Page 55 and 56:
number of years worked as a nurse w
- Page 57 and 58:
psychosomatic health, after demogra
- Page 59 and 60:
environment, and support from the s
- Page 61 and 62:
urnout. The factor which has been h
- Page 63 and 64:
Diener & Tov (2005, in Kitayama & C
- Page 65 and 66:
form of for example life satisfacti
- Page 67 and 68:
develop burnout (see for example La
- Page 69 and 70:
Simoni & Paterson (1997) have also
- Page 71 and 72:
the psychological immune system (Ol
- Page 73 and 74:
positive effect of social support i
- Page 75 and 76:
Several authors have shown the effe
- Page 77 and 78:
support especially important in rel
- Page 79 and 80:
(1999), Tummers et al. (2002), and
- Page 81 and 82:
According to Maslach (1982), when i
- Page 83 and 84:
2.11. HOW CAN WE PREVENT BURNOUT? 2
- Page 85 and 86:
work-related safety in order to dec
- Page 87 and 88:
in the organization are not easy to
- Page 89 and 90:
at work, and on the nurses’ work-
- Page 91 and 92:
3. METHOD 3.1 STUDY POPULATION The
- Page 93 and 94:
the head nurse at the second meetin
- Page 95 and 96:
• Satisfaction with Life scale (D
- Page 97 and 98:
assess people’s satisfaction with
- Page 99 and 100:
positive accomplishment in the nurs
- Page 101 and 102:
Goal Orientation 0.63 0.52 Impulse
- Page 103 and 104:
23,71% Number of children 0-1 2-3 4
- Page 105 and 106:
It was shown that the Swedish nurse
- Page 107 and 108:
APPENDIX 3); a robust Welch-test fo
- Page 109 and 110:
Table 8: ANOVA results of work stre
- Page 111 and 112:
In the second part of the second hy
- Page 113 and 114:
would be found in the Swedish sampl
- Page 115 and 116:
The Monitoring-Creating-Executing S
- Page 117 and 118:
4.6.3. Findings for Burnout and Per
- Page 119 and 120:
Table 17: Robust Test of Equality o
- Page 121 and 122:
Approach-Belief System (r=0.260, p
- Page 123 and 124:
p
- Page 125 and 126:
Approach-Belief System (1.01) and t
- Page 127 and 128:
Marital status Table 23: Burnout me
- Page 129 and 130:
generalized to other hospitals in S
- Page 131 and 132:
feeling inexperienced would result
- Page 133 and 134:
sample. Another researcher who foun
- Page 135 and 136:
5.3. BURNOUT AND LIFE SATISFACTION
- Page 137 and 138:
the findings in connection to life
- Page 139 and 140:
salaries of health care system pers
- Page 141 and 142:
urnout simply shows that the area o
- Page 143 and 144:
feel supported at home and feel the
- Page 145 and 146:
and that lower personality scores g
- Page 147 and 148:
connection between age and burnout.
- Page 149 and 150:
connection to them was not thought
- Page 151 and 152:
and young nurses working in the int
- Page 153 and 154:
extensively researched all around t
- Page 155 and 156:
what if the Hungarian nurses would
- Page 157 and 158:
immunity between different countrie
- Page 159 and 160:
care workers (usually nurses). In s
- Page 161 and 162:
more efficient if they would be dir
- Page 163 and 164:
Aries, M. & Ritter, I. Z. (1999). N
- Page 165 and 166:
Brooks I. & Swailes S. (2002). Anal
- Page 167 and 168:
Chang, E. M., Bidewell, J. W., Hunt
- Page 169 and 170:
Cronin-Stubbs, D. & Rooks, C. A. (1
- Page 171 and 172:
Diener, E., Suh, E., Lucas, R. E. &
- Page 173 and 174:
Ghorpade, J., Lackritz, J. & Singh,
- Page 175 and 176: Hupcey, J. E. (1998). Clarifying th
- Page 177 and 178: Lakin, B., Leon, S. C. & Miller, S.
- Page 179 and 180: Leiter, M. P. (1993). In Halbeslebe
- Page 181 and 182: Maslach, C. (1982). Burnout: a soci
- Page 183 and 184: Murrells, T., Robinson, S. & Griffi
- Page 185 and 186: Piko, B. F. (1999). Work-related st
- Page 187 and 188: Sherman, D. W. (2004). Nurses’ St
- Page 189 and 190: Taris, T. W., Schreurs, P. J. G. &
- Page 191 and 192: Wright, T. A. & Cropanzano, R. (199
- Page 193 and 194: a. Age…………..years old b. Wh
- Page 195 and 196: 6.I do not particularly like differ
- Page 197 and 198: 4) I am interested in how you feel
- Page 199 and 200: APPENDIX C ORIGINAL SPSS OUTPUTS Se
- Page 201 and 202: Cases Reliability Scale: ALPHA Case
- Page 203 and 204: Cases Case Processing Summary N % V
- Page 205 and 206: RELIABILITY /VARIABLES=pici7 pici23
- Page 207 and 208: Cases Case Processing Summary N % V
- Page 209 and 210: Reliability Statistics Cronbach's A
- Page 211 and 212: Section 6: Correlations of the test
- Page 213 and 214: Emotional exhaustion_ mbi Depersona
- Page 215 and 216: Table 11: Robust Tests of Equality
- Page 217 and 218: ience d Worklo ad Stress related to
- Page 219 and 220: Table 17: Coefficients(a) Unstandar
- Page 221 and 222: Table 23: Excluded Variables(b) Par
- Page 223 and 224: Table 30: Test of Homogeneity of Va
- Page 225: a Predictors in the Model: (Constan
- Page 229 and 230: Social support questionnaire ,145(b
- Page 231 and 232: Being unprepaired and feeling inexp
- Page 233 and 234: Social mobilizing capac. subscale_P
- Page 235 and 236: Section 16: Correlations of the PIC
- Page 237 and 238: Table 48: Correlations: (Group numb
- Page 239 and 240: Positive thinking subscale_PIC I Se
- Page 241 and 242: Positive thinking subscale_PICI Sen
- Page 243 and 244: Approach-Belief System Monitoring-C
- Page 245 and 246: Approach-Belief System Monitoring-
- Page 247 and 248: Model 1 Variables Entered Work stre
- Page 249 and 250: Change and Challenge orient. subsca
- Page 251 and 252: Married -,160(c) -2,798 ,006 -,208
- Page 253 and 254: Relationship with the patient’s r
- Page 255 and 256: More than 5 years worked as a nurse
- Page 257 and 258: Work and private life ,006(b) ,079
- Page 259 and 260: Social creation capac. subscale_PIC
- Page 261 and 262: 6 7 Residual 6334,172 172 36,827 To
- Page 263 and 264: Self-Efficacy subscale_PICI ,109(a)
- Page 265 and 266: Significant other subscale_ social
- Page 267 and 268: Stress related to tasks -,109(d) -1
- Page 269 and 270: 7 Age Relationship with patients Wo
- Page 271 and 272: Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label Burnout
- Page 273 and 274: country ss ws ls PIC Burnout PIC ,0
- Page 275 and 276: Table 106: ECVI Model ECVI LO 90 HI
- Page 277 and 278:
coun try 2,41 8 dp -,723 ss ls PICI
- Page 279 and 280:
Table 120: tandardized Indirect Eff
- Page 281 and 282:
ment_mbi Emotional exhaustion_mbi D
- Page 283 and 284:
Personal accomplishment _mbi single
- Page 285 and 286:
2 Model 1 2 Married . a Dependent V
- Page 287 and 288:
Number of years at the current work
- Page 289 and 290:
edu Total How many years have you w
- Page 291 and 292:
Table 160: Chi-Square Tests Value d
- Page 293 and 294:
Death, dying Conflic ts with doctor
- Page 295 and 296:
Death, dying Conflic ts with doctor
- Page 297 and 298:
** Correlation is significant at th
- Page 299 and 300:
Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label e12 2,40
- Page 301 and 302:
APPMONSYS CREEXSYS SELFREGSYS Goal
- Page 303 and 304:
Table 184: RMSEA Model RMSEA LO 90
- Page 305 and 306:
Table 192: Correlations: (Group num
- Page 307 and 308:
APPMONSYS CREEXSYS SELFREGSYS Self-
- Page 309:
Table 204: NCP Model NCP LO 90 HI 9