122 Zohar Atkins vilest person contains a divine spark, 3 and therefore a self, but his evil deeds result from an ignorance of God and a denial of the self. In the same way that Augustine prays to know God, the sinner sins because he knows not God. Thus, Augustine beseeches God not only to reveal His face so that he may know Him better, but so he can keep far from sin. Augustine struggles to conquer his concupiscent urges by channeling them towards his ultimate desire, to be as one not with a strumpet, but rather with God Himself. In Augustine’s biographical narrative, focusing not on his physical aging and his worldly accomplishments, but on his spiritual journey, we glimpse the magnificence of his individual soul, even if it is simply a function of God’s identity. Augustine surely recognizes the strong assertion of selfhood required to write, and acknowledges that no other self could produce a replica of his written works, his life, and his soul. In Book VI, upon witnessing Ambrose pouring silently over a Scriptural text, he stands mesmerized by the power of the written word, the fixity of the otherwise open, seeing Scripture as an embodiment of the Divine, in the same way that he calls Christ “the voice of your [God’s] truth” (Conf. 6.10). In Book XII, he offers an exegetical interpretation of the creation story, justifying his elucidation with one of the most poignant verifications of the self within a divine framework: If we both see that what you say is true and also that what I say is true, what enables us to recognize this truth? I do not see it in you, nor do you see it in me, but we both see it in the immutable Truth which is above our minds. Therefore, since there is no dispute between us about the light which shines from the Lord our God, why do we argue about the thoughts of a fellow man, which we cannot see as clearly as we see the immutable Truth? Even if Moses were to appear to us and say ‘This is what I meant,” we should not see his thoughts but would simply believe his word. (Conf. 12.25) Augustine sees the corpus of God as necessary, because it allows people to grab hold of the immaterial, but he also enunciates the importance of remembering that behind each personal connection and construal remains a singular objective, Truth. Augustine mentions God significantly more than he pays pen service to Jesus, because he has, in a certain sense, replaced Jesus, and his Confessions have, to an extent, supplanted the Bible. Though Augustine still adamantly vouches for the Son of God and the Biblical brainchild of God, he places profound importance on the internal revelation of the self, the individual’s mechanism for bonding with the divine. Augustine’s self has room to coexist with God, to nourish itself with its mother’s milk of God’s love. Augustine privileges the plurality of paths, joyfully promulgating the singular ends betokened them if they embrace God—namely, eternal salvation. Building upon the Socratic command of “know thyself,” Augustine sees self-knowledge and 3 Book 7.12, pp. 148. Augustine writes, “But if they are deprived of all good, they will not exist at all.”
Augustine’s Imitatio Dei—A Rejection of Self Sacrifice 123 God-knowledge as one and the same. The universality of God, of the self, of the soul, still preserves individuality, because it tenders a model of existence that is simultaneously external and internal, innately given and difficultly attained, unified and differentiated. Augustine’s self becomes the highest rung of existence, and the foundation for all substance. References Saint Augustine. <strong>19</strong>61. Confessions. Enbland: Penguin Books. The Holy Bible. 2006. New York: American Bible Society.
- Page 2 and 3:
Faculty Editor Joseph Pucci Managin
- Page 4 and 5:
Law Codes of Gortyn, Crete, Greece,
- Page 6 and 7:
Tholos Temple, Sanctuary of Athena
- Page 8 and 9:
Livy’s Exemplary History 71 Amy H
- Page 10 and 11:
Tomb of M. Vergilius Eurysaces the
- Page 12 and 13:
2 Sarah Grover strates the secondar
- Page 14 and 15:
4 Sarah Grover The focalization at
- Page 16 and 17:
6 Sarah Grover is limited to the ch
- Page 18 and 19:
8 Ephesus. Original photograph by J
- Page 20 and 21:
10 Laura Brown-Lavoie What to call
- Page 22 and 23:
12 Excavation of the Fortress of Ma
- Page 24 and 25:
14 Lindsey Brett Meyers Hephaestus
- Page 26 and 27:
16 Lindsey Brett Meyers metheus tha
- Page 28 and 29:
18 Lindsey Brett Meyers sublimate h
- Page 30 and 31:
20 Treasury of the Athenians, Delph
- Page 32 and 33:
22 Mark Morales bombards the audien
- Page 34 and 35:
24 Sketch of Nike relief from the b
- Page 36 and 37:
26 Hillary Dixler imagination, is t
- Page 38 and 39:
28 Hillary Dixler assigns to the ep
- Page 40 and 41:
30 Hillary Dixler Through the struc
- Page 42 and 43:
32 Eleanor Thomas only one of them
- Page 44 and 45:
34 Eleanor Thomas On the other hand
- Page 46 and 47:
36 Eleanor Thomas In Hippocratic me
- Page 48 and 49:
38 Eleanor Thomas his idea of the p
- Page 50 and 51:
40 Maia Peck pottery excavated at A
- Page 52 and 53:
42 Maia Peck fruits, and sometimes
- Page 54 and 55:
44 Maia Peck suggests that the anci
- Page 56 and 57:
46 Column at Ephesus. Original phot
- Page 58 and 59:
48 Matthew Nicholson This assumptio
- Page 60 and 61:
50 Matthew Nicholson do battle. Enc
- Page 62 and 63:
52 Matthew Nicholson Alcibiades, in
- Page 64 and 65:
54 Tomb of Iltutmis, 1235, Qutub Mi
- Page 66 and 67:
56 Amanda Earl likened to heroes. A
- Page 68 and 69:
58 Amanda Earl contrasting Sparta w
- Page 70 and 71:
60 Amanda Earl naively believe in t
- Page 72 and 73:
62 Amanda Earl
- Page 74 and 75:
64 Stephanie Bernhard Plutarch port
- Page 76 and 77:
66 Stephanie Bernhard expression or
- Page 78 and 79:
68 Martha Gimbel Aeneas should peri
- Page 80 and 81:
70 Martha Gimbel She cries, “I am
- Page 82 and 83: 72 Amy Hall Goins Once again, the p
- Page 84 and 85: 74 Amy Hall Goins Though Livy certa
- Page 86 and 87: 76 Pyrrhus. Sketch by Nicholas Kay.
- Page 88 and 89: 78 Ariayné Hilliard then will I re
- Page 90 and 91: 80 Ariayné Hilliard honor, bringer
- Page 92 and 93: 82 Scott Nelson weeds, which he ass
- Page 94 and 95: 84 Scott Nelson natus’ love and d
- Page 96 and 97: 86 Curtis Steyers the expenses of c
- Page 98 and 99: 88 Curtis Steyers Few historians of
- Page 100 and 101: 90 Curtis Steyers Now the last age
- Page 102 and 103: 92 Grainne O’Hara Belluomo the na
- Page 104 and 105: 94 Grainne O’Hara Belluomo also m
- Page 106 and 107: 96 Grainne O’Hara Belluomo of sub
- Page 108 and 109: 98 Peter Catsimpiris Immediately af
- Page 110 and 111: 100 Peter Catsimpiris counter to th
- Page 112 and 113: 102 Megan Cohen is forced to either
- Page 114 and 115: 104 Megan Cohen becomes a driving f
- Page 116 and 117: 106 David Guttmann ings. Each chara
- Page 118 and 119: 108 David Guttmann external object,
- Page 120 and 121: 110 Elizabeth Broadwin heading to h
- Page 122 and 123: 112 Elizabeth Broadwin Lucian’s c
- Page 124 and 125: 114 Elizabeth Broadwin This passage
- Page 126 and 127: 116 Elizabeth Broadwin philosophy w
- Page 128 and 129: 118 Laocoon. Vatican, Italy, ca. fi
- Page 130 and 131: 120 Zohar Atkins Him. He shows how
- Page 134 and 135: 124 The Charioteer of Delphi. Delph
- Page 136 and 137: 126 Francesco Pucci By the end of t
- Page 138 and 139: 128 Francesco Pucci aural imagery u
- Page 140 and 141: 130 Francesco Pucci Mustard, Wilfre
- Page 142 and 143: 132 Morgan Palmer addition, both th
- Page 144 and 145: 134 Morgan Palmer the translator’
- Page 146 and 147: 136 Morgan Palmer in a different la
- Page 148: 2 David Fusaro Morgan Palmer, class