You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The Hippocratic View of Epilepsy<br />
and Brain Function<br />
Eleanor Thomas<br />
The Sacred Disease by Hippocrates is a fifth century treatise which attempts to<br />
explain the symptoms, causes, and prognosis of a person suffering from epilepsy.<br />
It also seeks to debunk claims by magicians and other sources considered<br />
disreputable that epilepsy is a “sacred disease,” ordained by the gods and<br />
curable through religious and magical expiation. In proposing a model of brain<br />
function, it asserts that epilepsy is a legitimate physical disease, like any other,<br />
and that it originates in the brain, when specific pathophysiological processes<br />
disrupt normal functioning.<br />
One can learn much about the cultural environment and prevailing attitudes<br />
towards illness from The Sacred Disease. Prognosis, and not treatment, is the<br />
primary focus of the text. Hippocrates makes powerful arguments about the usefulness<br />
of accurate prognosis to a physician, as it gives him credibility. However<br />
in the modern sense the utility of The Sacred Disease is very limited, since treatment<br />
is neglected in favor of prognosis. Though the author at times appears<br />
overly preoccupied with arguments against superstitious explanations for epilepsy,<br />
Hippocrates’ treatise on epilepsy is notable as an ancient model for how<br />
the brain works and consequences of disruption of function; he provides a logical<br />
and consistent system of cognition.<br />
Since Hippocrates argues so vehemently against the sacred origin of epilepsy,<br />
the meaning he ascribes to the term the “sacred disease” is a logical starting<br />
point in an analysis of this treatise. Is in fact epilepsy what ancient authors<br />
have in mind when they describe the “sacred disease?” There is much evidence<br />
that most did, and Hippocrates’ description of the disease is certainly very consistent<br />
with the modern conception of epilepsy. When Herodotus describes<br />
Cambyses, a Persian monarch, he states that “from his birth he was afflicted<br />
with a dreadful disease. . . which some call the sacred sickness” and also<br />
comments that “it would be by no means strange, therefore, if his mind were<br />
affected in some degree, seeing that his body labored under so sore a malady”<br />
(Rawlinson, <strong>19</strong>42: 227). Herodotus’ use of the term “sacred sickness” does not<br />
conclusively refer to epilepsy, as it merely identifies the “sacred sickness” as an<br />
illness seated in the brain, not definitely distinguishing it from other mental<br />
illnesses, such as mania.<br />
One of Hippocrates’ most convincing arguments for a biological origin of<br />
epilepsy is that although a number of different diseases can cause mental illness,<br />
31