13.06.2013 Views

Volume 19, 2007 - Brown University

Volume 19, 2007 - Brown University

Volume 19, 2007 - Brown University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

66 Stephanie Bernhard<br />

expression or a jest, informs us better of their characters and inclinations . . .”<br />

(Alexander, 1). This passage reveals a pettiness in Cicero that would elude a<br />

reader of his political resume.<br />

Thus Plutarch often praises Cicero’s morally upright nature, but he also<br />

concedes Cicero’s vices of arrogance and self-love. He stresses, however, that<br />

Cicero’s shortcomings do not take away from his status as a great and admirable<br />

man because they are not moral failures. In his introduction to “Cimon,” Plutarch<br />

writes that “[w]e must not dwell on [errors] too emphatically in our<br />

history, but should rather show indulgence to human nature for its inability to<br />

produce a character which is absolutely good and uncompromisingly dedicated<br />

to virtue” (Cimon, 2). Fittingly, Plutarch chooses to portray all significant<br />

aspects of his subject’s character and explains that Cicero was pompous and<br />

often abrasive. But he also qualifies these faults: “He made himself obnoxious to<br />

a number of people, not because of anything which he did wrong but because<br />

people grew tired of hearing him continually praising himself and magnifying<br />

his achievements” (Cicero, 24). According to Plutarch, then, the qualities of<br />

humility and especially likeability are less important than right acts; for he does<br />

not deny Cicero’s greatness.<br />

Plutarch uses his biography of Cicero to illustrate the danger of bending to<br />

public opinion to gain popularity and the importance of heeding one’s personal<br />

instincts when making decisions. Though many of Plutarch’s reflections on<br />

Cicero’s character remain ambiguous, as he describes both his successes and<br />

shortcomings, they form an overall picture of Cicero as a principled man who<br />

stood up for his beliefs and convinced others to follow causes he believed would<br />

benefit the Republic. Plutarch writes that “[m]y method is, by the study of<br />

history, and by the familiarity acquired in writing, to habituate my memory to<br />

receive and retain images of the best and worthiest characters” (Timoleon, 1).<br />

The text of “Cicero” shows that Plutarch considers the great orator, though<br />

flawed, to possess a moral character worth remembering.<br />

References<br />

Plutarch. 2001a. Plutarch’s Lives, Vol. 1. Trans. John Dryden. New York: Random<br />

House.<br />

———. 2001b. Plutarch’s Lives, Vol. 2. Trans. John Dryden. New York: Random<br />

House.<br />

Ward, Allen, Heichelheim, Fritz, and Yeo, Cedric. 2003. A History of the Roman People,<br />

4 th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!